BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2025; 13(31): 110123
Published online Nov 6, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i31.110123
Table 1 Summary of Colchicine trial outcomes in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease
Trial number
Trial name/year
Official title
Details
Outcome
Notes
ACTRN 12610000293066LoDoCo/2013 Low-Dose Colchicine for Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseasen = 532; Patients diagnosed with stable, angiographically confirmed CAD who have maintained clinical stability for a minimum of six months were randomly assigned to receive either standard treatment in conjunction with 0.5 mg of daily colchicine or standard treatment aloneColchicine had a lower composite outcome of OHCA, ACS, or non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke vs control (5.3% vs 16%; HR, 0.33; 95%CI: 0.18-0.59; P < 0.001) The most common side effect was GI disturbance
NCT02551094COLCOT/2019 Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine after Myocardial Infarctionn = 4745; Patients within 30 days post MI were randomized to either standard therapy plus placebo or standard therapy plus 0.5 mg daily colchicineLower incidence of MACE in the colchicine group (5.5% vs 7.1%; HR, 0.77; 95%CI: 0.61-0.96; P = 0.02)The most common side effect was GI disturbance
ACTRN12615000861550COPS/2020Colchicine in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Australian COPS Randomized Clinical Trialn = 795; Patients presenting with ACS with evidence of CAD (angiographically managed with PCI or medical therapy) were randomized to receive either standard therapy plus colchicine (0.5 mg BID for the first month post ACS, then 0.5 mg daily for 11 months) or placebo plus standard therapyThere was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (HR, 0.65; 95%CI: 0.38-1.09; P = 0.1) in the primary outcome (i.e., a composite of all-cause mortality, ACS [STEMI/NSTEMI/UA], ischemia-driven urgent revascularization, and noncardioembolic ischemic stroke). However, the colchicine arm showed lower incidence of the primary outcome when all-cause mortality was replaced with CV mortality (5% vs 9.5%; HR, 0.51; 95%CI: 0.29-0.89; P = 0.019)The most common side effect was GI disturbance
ACTRN12614000093684LoDoCo2/2020Colchicine in Patients with Chronic Coronary Diseasen = 5552; Patients with stable CAD (angiographically or CAC score ≥ 400 AU) who were clinically stable for ≥ 6 months were randomized to either standard therapy plus 0.5 mg daily colchicine or to standard therapy plus placebo. A total of 3,179 patients had ACS for a duration of 24 months or more prior to randomizationColchicine demonstrated a reduced occurrence of cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or ischemia-driven coronary revascularization compared to placebo (6.8% vs 9.6%; HR, 0.69; 95%CI: 0.57-0.83; P < 0.001)The colchicine group experienced a higher occurrence of non-cardiovascular deaths, although this was not statistically significant (incidence, 0.7 compared to 0.5 events per 100 person-years; HR, 1.51; 95%CI: 0.99-2.31)
NCT03048825CLEAR SYNERGY/2024Colchicine in Acute Myocardial Infarctionn = 7062; Patients within 72 hours post MI were randomized to either standard therapy plus 0.5 mg daily colchicine or to standard therapy plus placeboThere was no significant difference in MACE outcomes observed between the two groups (9.1% compared to 9.3%; HR, 0.99; 95%CI: 0.85-1.16; P = 0.93). Additionally, there was no notable difference in all-cause mortality (4.6% compared to 5.1%; HR, 0.90; 95%CI: 0.73-1.12)A higher incidence of diarrhea was reported in the colchicine group (6.6% vs 10.2%; P < 0.001)