Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2024; 12(5): 931-941
Published online Feb 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i5.931
Published online Feb 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i5.931
Table 1 Correlation between glucose transport protein 1 expression and clinicopathological parameters
GLUT-1 (center) | P value | GLUT-1 (periphery) | P value | |||
(-) (n = 83) | (+) (n = 86) | (-) (n = 78) | (+) (n = 91) | |||
Age (yr ± SD) | 64.0 ± 11.4 | 64.7 ± 12.6 | 0.740 | 64.0 ± 11.6 | 64.7 ± 12.4 | 0.718 |
Sex | ||||||
Male | 52 | 54 | 0.985 | 51 | 55 | 0.507 |
Female | 31 | 32 | 27 | 36 | ||
Tumor size (mean ± SD) | 4.9 ± 1.8 | 5.2 ± 2.0 | 0.277 | 5.1 ± 1.7 | 5.1 ± 2.1 | 0.932 |
T stage | ||||||
T1, 2 | 16 | 7 | 0.035 | 11 | 12 | 0.836 |
T3, 4 | 67 | 79 | 67 | 79 | ||
N stage | ||||||
N0 | 51 | 48 | 0.457 | 48 | 51 | 0.47 |
N1-2 | 32 | 38 | 30 | 40 | ||
AJCC stage | ||||||
I, II | 49 | 48 | 0.672 | 47 | 50 | 0.486 |
III, IV | 34 | 38 | 31 | 41 | ||
Lymphatic invasion | ||||||
Negative | 70 | 72 | 0.913 | 64 | 78 | 0.517 |
Positive | 13 | 14 | 14 | 13 | ||
Perineural invasion | ||||||
Negative | 66 | 73 | 0.361 | 68 | 71 | 0.12 |
Positive | 17 | 13 | 10 | 20 | ||
Blood glucose level (mean ± SD) | 110.5 ± 36.2 | 111.6 ± 25.8 | 0.818 | 112.4 ± 38.8 | 109.9 ± 23.2 | 0.612 |
SUVmax of primary tumor (mean ± SD) | 12.3 ± 5.9 | 16.1 ± 7.4 | <0.001 | 13.0 ± 6.4 | 15.3 ± 7.3 | 0.030 |
SUVmax of lymph node (mean ± SD) | 1.04 ± 2.6 | 2.15 ± 3.1 | 0.012 | 0.99 ± 2.6 | 2.13 ± 3.0 | 0.010 |
Table 2 Predictive value of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography based on glucose transport protein 1 expression
Pathology | PET/CT diagnosis | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | |||
PET LN (+) | PET LN (-) | (%) | (%) | |||||
All patients (n = 169) | LN (+) | 35 | 35 | 50 | 81.8 | 66.03 | 69.82 | |
LN (-) | 18 | 81 | ||||||
Tumor center | GLUT-1 negative (n = 83) | LN (+) | 12 | 20 | 37.5 | 88.2 | 66.6 | 69.2 |
LN (-) | 6 | 45 | ||||||
GLUT-1 positive (n = 86) | LN (+) | 23 | 15 | 60.5 | 75 | 65.7 | 70.6 | |
LN (-) | 12 | 36 | ||||||
Tumor periphery | GLUT-1 negative (n = 78) | LN (+) | 9 | 21 | 29 | 87.5 | 60 | 66.6 |
LN (-) | 6 | 42 | ||||||
GLUT-1 positive (n = 91) | LN (+) | 26 | 14 | 65 | 76.5 | 68.4 | 73.6 | |
LN (-) | 12 | 39 |
Table 3 The correlation between glucose transport protein 3 expression and clinicopathologic parameters
GLUT-3 (center) | P value | GLUT-3 (periphery) | P value | |||
(-) (n = 153) | (+) (n = 12) | (-) (n = 78) | (+) (n = 91) | |||
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 64.5 ± 11.8 | 63.0 ± 14.6 | 0.729 | 64.1 ± 11.9 | 67.8 ± 13.0 | 0.194 |
Sex | ||||||
Male | 98 | 5 | 0.135 | 93 | 7 | 0.013 |
Female | 55 | 7 | 49 | 13 | ||
Tumor size (mean ± SD) | 5.07 ± 2.0 | 5.02 ± 2.0 | 0.931 | 5.05 ± 2.0 | 5.20 ± 1.6 | 0.743 |
T stage | ||||||
T1, 2 | 20 | 2 | 0.663 | 20 | 1 | 0.475 |
T3, 4 | 133 | 10 | 122 | 19 | ||
N stage | ||||||
N0 | 93 | 4 | 0.074 | 89 | 6 | 0.007 |
N1-2 | 60 | 8 | 53 | 14 | ||
AJCC stage | ||||||
I, II | 91 | 4 | 0.127 | 87 | 6 | 0.014 |
III, IV | 62 | 8 | 53 | 14 | ||
Lymphatic invasion | ||||||
Negative | 128 | 11 | 0.693 | 120 | 17 | 1.000 |
Positive | 25 | 1 | 22 | 33 | ||
Perineural invasion | ||||||
Negative | 127 | 8 | 0.234 | 117 | 17 | 1.000 |
Positive | 26 | 4 | 25 | 3 | ||
Blood sugar level (mean ± SD) | 111.3 ± 32.0 | 109.2 ± 26.9 | 0.803 | 112.7 ± 33.0 | 101.8 ± 20.3 | 0.150 |
SUV max of primary tumor (mean ± SD) | 14.1 ± 7.5 | 13.5 ± 4.7 | 0.678 | 14.3 ± 7.6 | 12.9 ± 4.8 | 0.433 |
SUV max of lymph node (mean ± SD) | 1.6 ± 2.8 | 2.8 ± 4.0 | 0.328 | 1.4 ± 2.7 | 3.8 ± 4.0 | 0.013 |
Table 4 The correlation between hexokinase-II expression and clinicopathologic parameters
Hexokinase-II (center) | P value | Hexokinase-II (periphery) | P value | |||
(-) (n = 94) | (+) (n = 70) | (-) (n = 114) | (+) (n = 48) | |||
Age (yr ± SD) | 65.1 ± 12.3 | 63.5 ± 11.6 | 0.403 | 64.3 ± 12.3 | 64.8 ± 11.5 | 0.806 |
Sex | ||||||
Male | 61 | 41 | 0.409 | 73 | 27 | 0.352 |
Female | 33 | 29 | 41 | 21 | ||
Tumor size (mean ± SD) | 5.1 ± 1.8 | 5.1 ± 2.2 | 0.976 | 5.1 ± 2.0 | 5.1 ± 1.9 | 0.977 |
T stage | ||||||
T1, 2 | 15 | 7 | 0.268 | 16 | 5 | 0.531 |
T3, 4 | 79 | 63 | 98 | 43 | ||
N stage | ||||||
N0 | 54 | 42 | 0.743 | 68 | 28 | 0.876 |
N1-2 | 40 | 28 | 46 | 20 | ||
AJCC stage | ||||||
I, II | 53 | 41 | 0.779 | 67 | 27 | 0.766 |
III, IV | 41 | 29 | 47 | 21 | ||
Lymphatic invasion | ||||||
Negative | 77 | 61 | 0.365 | 97 | 40 | 0.778 |
Positive | 17 | 9 | 17 | 8 | ||
Perineural invasion | ||||||
Negative | 75 | 60 | 0.325 | 95 | 38 | 0.528 |
Positive | 19 | 10 | 19 | 10 | ||
Blood glucose level (mean ± SD) | 105.2 ± 22.8 | 116.8 ± 35.1 | 0.017 | 110.2 ± 32.0 | 113.9 ± 31.3 | 0.493 |
SUVmax of primary tumor (mean ± SD) | 14.0 ± 7.1 | 14.2 ± 7.7 | 0.874 | 14.3 ± 7.2 | 13.9 ± 7.7 | 0.786 |
SUVmax of lymph node (mean ± SD) | 1.6 ± 2.8 | 1.8 ± 3.2 | 0.712 | 1.5 ± 2.6 | 2.0 ± 3.7 | 0.450 |
Table 5 The correlation between hypoxia-induced factor-1 expression and clinicopathologic parameters
HIF-1 (center) | P value | HIF-1 (periphery) | P value | |||
(-) (n = 94) | (+) (n = 72) | (-) (n = 89) | (+) (n = 75) | |||
Age (yr), mean ± SD | 64.0 ± 12.4 | 65.1 ± 11.5 | 0.576 | 63.5 ± 12.6 | 65.6 ± 11.3 | 0.246 |
Sex | ||||||
Male | 59 | 45 | 0.972 | 58 | 45 | 0.495 |
Female | 35 | 27 | 31 | 30 | ||
Tumor size (mean ± SD) | 4.7 ± 1.7 | 5.5 ± 2.2 | 0.014 | 4.8 ± 1.7 | 5.3 ± 2.2 | 0.082 |
T stage | ||||||
T1, 2 | 17 | 6 | 0.071 | 16 | 7 | 0.112 |
T3, 4 | 77 | 66 | 73 | 68 | ||
N stage | ||||||
N0 | 59 | 38 | 0.196 | 57 | 40 | 0.164 |
N1-2 | 35 | 34 | 32 | 35 | ||
AJCC stage | ||||||
I, II | 57 | 38 | 0.310 | 55 | 40 | 0.274 |
III, IV | 37 | 34 | 34 | 35 | ||
Lymphatic invasion | ||||||
Negative | 80 | 60 | 0.755 | 76 | 62 | 0.634 |
Positive | 14 | 12 | 13 | 13 | ||
Perineural invasion | ||||||
Negative | 77 | 59 | 0.996 | 73 | 61 | 0.909 |
Positive | 17 | 13 | 16 | 14 | ||
Blood glucose level (mean ± SD) | 109.91 ± 30.8 | 112.29 ± 32.6 | 0.632 | 108.97 ± 32.2 | 113.69 ± 31.1 | 0.342 |
SUVmax of primary tumor (mean ± SD) | 14.0 ± 7.1 | 14.0 ± 7.6 | 0.979 | 14.2 ± 7.0 | 13.8 ± 7.9 | 0.754 |
SUVmax of lymph node (mean ± SD) | 1.4 ± 2.9 | 2.0 ± 2.9 | 0.229 | 1.6 ± 2.9 | 1.8 ± 2.9 | 0.713 |
- Citation: Kim H, Choi SY, Heo TY, Kim KR, Lee J, Yoo MY, Lee TG, Han JH. Value of glucose transport protein 1 expression in detecting lymph node metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(5): 931-941
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i5/931.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i5.931