Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2024; 12(34): 6687-6695
Published online Dec 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i34.6687
Table 1 Demographic data of the patients analyzed in the study
Characteristics
n
Sex
Total, n = 391
Females247 (63.2)
Males144 (36.8)
Age
Mean45.26
Standard deviation16.72
Minimum18
Maximum96
Age groups
18 and 1918
20-2963
30-3972
40-4977
50-5971
60-6960
70-7921
80-898
90-991
Table 2 Results of the intraclass correlation coefficient analyses
Parameter
Subparameter
95 %CI
Intraclass correlation coefficient
Lower bound
Upper bound
Reviewer 1SBA0.9980.9990.998
mSBA0.9990.9990.999
Reviewer 2SBA0.9970.9980.997
mSBA0.9990.9990.999
R1 vs R2 for M1SBA0.9970.9980.998
mSBA0.9980.9990.998
R1 vs R2 for M2SBA0.9960.9970.996
mSBA0.9990.9990.999
Table 3 Comparison of the measured skull base angles between females and males
Interpretations by the reviewers
Female
Male
P value
SBA
R1132.19 ± 4.88130.92 ± 4.520.011
R2132.22 ± 4.88130.96 ± 4.490.012
mSBA
R1118.23 ± 3.72116.20 ± 3.66< 0.001
R2118.19 ± 3.70116.20 ± 3.63< 0.001
Table 4 Correlation between skull base angle measurements and age
Measurement and reviewer
Correlation coefficient
P value
SBA measurement by R10.0140.788
SBA measurement by R20.0210.685
mSBA measurement by R1-0.235< 0.001
mSBA measurement by R2-0.233< 0.001