Effect of intraoperative injection of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation after cesarean section

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 12, Issue 28

This Article

Academic Content and Language Evaluation of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Number of Hits and Downloads for This Article

Total Article Views (1916)

All Articles published online

The chart showing PDF series, HTML series, Tables (1-7) series.

Item

Count

PDF

37

HTML

1446

Tables (1-7)

131

Sum=1614

Hide

Publishing Process of This Article

The chart showing Browse series, Download series.

Item

Count

Browse

36

Download

206

Sum=242

Hide

Oct 6, 2024 (publication date) through Feb 11, 2025

Times Cited of This Article

Times Cited (1)

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Clinical Cases

ISSN

2307-8960

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Clinical Trials Study

Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

World J Clin Cases. Oct 6, 2024; 12(28): 6195-6203
Published online Oct 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i28.6195

Table 1 Comparison of general and surgical characteristics among the three groups of pregnant women

Indicator	Low-dose group (n = 97)	How-dose group (n = 97)	Control group (n = 98)	F/χ²	P value
Age (years, mean ± SD)	32 ± 4	33 ± 8	33 ± 4	0.988	0.374
BMI (kg/m², mean ± SD)	28.8 ± 3.3	28.9 ± 2.9	29.0 ± 2.8	0.159	0.853
Preoperative Hb (g/L, mean ± SD)	115 ± 8	115 ± 8	114 ± 7	0.055	0.946
Parity, n (%)				1.317	0.859
Primipara	25 (25.8)	29 (29.9)	28 (28.6)
Multipara	62 (63.9)	61 (62.9)	59 (60.2)
Grand multipara	10 (10.3)	7 (7.2)	11 (11.2)
Education level, n (%)				1.712	0.789
Below college	21 (21.6)	21 (21.6)	24 (24.5)
College and undergraduate	64 (66.0)	67 (69.1)	67 (68.4)
Master and above	12 (12.4)	9 (9.3)	7 (7.1)
Blood loss (mL, mean ± SD)	372 ± 59	373 ± 59	361 ± 58	1.234	0.293
Operative time (min, mean ± SD)	37 ± 8	37 ± 8	36 ± 8	0.222	0.801

Hb: Haemoglobin.

Table 2 Comparison of Visual Analog Scale scores at different time points post-cesarean section among the three groups of pregnant women (scores, mean ± SD)

Time point	Low-dose group (n = 97)	How-dose group (n = 97)	Control group (n = 98)	F/χ²	P value
Postoperative 6 hours	1.8 ± 0.4^a	1.9 ± 0.8^a	2.3 ± 0.6^b	22.358	< 0.001
Postoperative 12 hours	2.7 ± 0.7^a	2.6 ± 0.7^a	3.3 ± 1.2^b	15.599	< 0.001
Postoperative 24 hours	3.1 ± 1.0^a	2.7 ± 0.8^a^,^b	3.5 ± 1.2^b	17.220	< 0.001
Postoperative 48 hours	2.1 ± 0.6	2.1 ± 0.7^a	2.4 ± 1.1	4.498	0.012
Rescue rate, n (%)	15 (15.5)	14 (14.4)	27 (27.6)	6.705	0.035

^aP < 0.05 compared with control group.

^bP < 0.05 compared with low-dose group.

Table 3 Comparison of Edinburgh Postnatal Depression scale scores at different time points among the three groups of pregnant women (scores, mean ± SD)

Time point	Low-dose group (n = 97)	How-dose group (n = 97)	Control group (n = 98)	F value	P value
Prenatal 1 day	7.5 ± 2.2	7.2 ± 2.3	7.3 ± 2.3	0.245	0.783
Postoperative 2 day	7.2 ± 2.2^a	7.5 ± 2.6^a	8.8 ± 3.4^b	8.331	< 0.001
Postoperative 7 day	7.3 ± 3.1^a	7.0 ± 2.9^a	9.1 ± 3.3^b	13.639	< 0.001
Postoperative 42 day	8.3 ± 3.1	8.1 ± 3.0	8.8 ± 3.6	1.158	0.316

^aP < 0.05 compared with control group.

^bP < 0.05 compared with low-dose group.

Table 4 Comparison of postpartum depression incidence at different time points among the three groups of pregnant women, n (%)

Time point	Low-dose group (n = 97)	How-dose group (n = 97)	Control group (n = 98)	χ² value	P value
Postoperative 2 day	5 (5.1)^a	6 (6.2)^a	14 (14.3)^b	6.218	0.045
Postoperative 7 day	8 (8.2)^a	5 (5.1)^a	16 (16.3)^b	7.238	0.027
Postoperative 42 day	11 (11.3)	10 (10.3)	17 (17.3)	2.484	0.289

^aP < 0.05 compared with control group.

^bP < 0.05 compared with low-dose group.

Table 5 Comparison of Ramsay scores after intravenous injection of esketamine among the three groups of pregnant women (scores, mean ± SD)

Time point	Low-dose group (n = 97)	How-dose group (n = 97)	Control group (n = 98)	F value	P value
Mediate injection	1.92 ± 0.28	1.89 ± 0.33	1.83 ± 0.37	1.47	0.23
5 minutes post-injection	3.4 ± 0.6^a	4.8 ± 0.4^a^,^b	1.8 ± 0.4^b	949.15	< 0.01
15 minutes post-injection	2.2 ± 0.5^a	3.6 ± 0.6^a^,^b	1.9 ± 0.3^b	355.18	< 0.01
Immediate postoperative	2.04 ± 0.20^a	2.08 ± 0.28^a	1.85 ± 0.39	17.25	< 0.01

^aP < 0.05 compared with control group.

^bP < 0.05 compared with low-dose group.

Table 6 Comparison of post-cesarean section recovery indicators among the three groups of pregnant women (hours, mean ± SD)

Time point	Low-dose group (n = 97)	How-dose group (n = 97)	Control group (n = 98)	F value	P value
Time to first flatus	29 ± 6	28 ± 5	30 ± 5	1.950	0.144
Time to first bowel movement	66 ± 11	65 ± 11	66 ± 10	0.238	0.788
Time to ambulation	23.9 ± 3.1^a	23.8 ± 2.5^a	25.3 ± 3.0^b	8.088	< 0.001

^aP < 0.05 compared with control group.

^bP < 0.05 compared with low-dose group.

Table 7 Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions after intravenous injection of ketamine in three groups, n (%)

Adverse reaction	Administration time	Low-dose group (n = 97)	How-dose group (n = 97)	Control group (n = 98)	χ² value	P value
Nausea & vomiting	0-2 h	2 (2.1)	2 (2.1)	3 (3.1)	0.278	0.870
Headache	0-2 h	0 (0)	2 (2.1)	0 (0)	4.048	0.132
Hallucination	0-2 h	2 (7.2)^a	9 (9.3)^a^,^b	0 (0)	8.949	0.011
Dizziness	0-2 h	7 (7.2)	7 (7.2)	2 (2.0)	3.368	0.186
Drowsiness	0-2 h	6 (10.3)^a	17 (17.5)^a^,^b	0 (0)	18.039	< 0.001
Diplopia	0-2 h	2 (8)^a	9 (9.3)^a^,^b	0 (0)	9.213	0.010
Shivering	0-2 h	5 (5.2)	3 (3.1)	6 (6.1)	1.022	0.600
Itching	0-2 h	0 (0)	3 (3.1)	2 (2.0)	2.851	0.240
Reaction delay	0-2 h	3 (3.1)	3 (3.1)	0 (0)	3.095	0.213

^aP < 0.05 compared with control group.

^bP < 0.05 compared with low-dose group.

Citation: Chen HZ, Gao Y, Li KK, An L, Yan J, Li H, Zhang J. Effect of intraoperative injection of esketamine on postoperative analgesia and postoperative rehabilitation after cesarean section. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(28): 6195-6203
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i28/6195.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i28.6195

Write to the Help Desk

© 2004-2025 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

California Corporate Number: 3537345