Randomized Controlled Trial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2024; 12(26): 5930-5936
Published online Sep 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i26.5930
Table 1 Intensive care unit mobility scale rating scale
IMS
Activity content
Grade 0Perform the first step, physical activity (goal; twice daily), including PROM at least 10 times daily, and train and encourage family members to perform PROM on the patient for 15–30 min, if the patient can tolerate it
Grade 1Perform step 2 and step 3. If not tolerated, perform step 3 first and step 2 again. Step 2, elevate the head of the bed > 45° for > 1 h (goal: Twice daily). Step 3, adjust the bed to a chair position, elevate the head of the bed > 60° for > 1 h, and repeat every 2 h if tolerated by the patient
Grade 2Perform step 4, adjusting the bed into a heart failure chair position for > 1 h, and if the patient tolerates it, repeat the above every 2 h for > 4 h at a time. Steps 2 to 4 require checking the patient’s tolerance level at least twice every 30 min
Grade 3Perform step 5, sit at the edge of the bed (target; 20 min) or help the patient to sit at the edge of the bed with minimal assistance, this step requires at least one staff member to help the patient sit and assist the patient to move their lower limbs
Grade 4Perform step 6, stand at the edge of the bed for > 2 min (goal; twice daily). If possible, try to walk at the edge of the bed for 10 s
Grades 5–6Perform step 7, move the patient to sit on a chair for > 60 min (goal; 2–3 times daily) and adjust the patient’s sitting position every 1 h, if the patient is unstable during this process, support the patient to the chair with assistance and do not continue to step 8
Grades 7–10Perform step 8, walking tolerance training (goal; 2-3 times daily), recording the distance the patient walks and assistive devices used
Table 2 Comparison of general demographic and clinical data of post cardiac surgery patients in the two groups
Factors
Observation, n = 60
Control, n = 60
χ2
P value
Sex
Men 40312.7940.095
Women 2029
Age
18–30012.5880.662
31–501111
51–602317
61–701621
70 above1010
Occupation
Farmer54541.6120.816
Laborer13
Retired21
Other32
APACHE-II
1–1016193.0880.244
11–203739
21–3072
Diagnosis
Heart valve disease343401
Coronary heart disease1818
Aortic dissection 88
Surgical procedure
Heart valve replacement + plasty21262.0370.361
Coronary bypass1820
Aortic replacement + plasty2114
Table 3 Comparison of the revised pelme critical patient activity score between the two groups of postoperative cardiac patients
Group
Cases
PermeScore
Of them
Activity upon requestImpaired mobilityBed mobilityUnderbed mobility
Observation6025.98 ± 0.9771.15.812.1
Control6022.63 ± 1.08715.359.2
t-17.83
P valueP < 0.005
Table 4 Comparison of rehabilitation indexes between two groups of postoperative cardiac patients (mean ± SD)
Group
Cases
Duration of mechanical ventilation (h)
Length of ICU stay (d)
Observation6018.30 ± 3.284.04 ± 0.83
Control6021.59 ± 7.934.66 ± 2.19
t2.972.038
P valueP < 0.05P < 0.05
Table 5 Comparison of the incidence of complications or adverse events between the two groups of postoperative cardiac patients (cases), n (%)
Group
Cases
Number of cases
pulmonary atelectasis
arrhythmia
Poor incision healing
Pipe Slip
Total
Observation60211004 (6.7)
Control609431118 (30.0)
χ24.904
P valueP < 0.05