Wang L, Lu JY, Ma XX, Ma LO. Study of the intensive care unit activity scale in the early rehabilitation of patients after direct cardiac surgery. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(26): 5930-5936 [PMID: 39286377 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i26.5930]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Li Wang, MNurs, Nurse, Intensive Care Unit, Dongyang People’s Hospital, No. 60 Wuning West Road, Dongyang City, Jinhua 322100, Zhejiang Province, China. dyyykhjjjj@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Nursing
Article-Type of This Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2024; 12(26): 5930-5936 Published online Sep 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i26.5930
Table 1 Intensive care unit mobility scale rating scale
IMS
Activity content
Grade 0
Perform the first step, physical activity (goal; twice daily), including PROM at least 10 times daily, and train and encourage family members to perform PROM on the patient for 15–30 min, if the patient can tolerate it
Grade 1
Perform step 2 and step 3. If not tolerated, perform step 3 first and step 2 again. Step 2, elevate the head of the bed > 45° for > 1 h (goal: Twice daily). Step 3, adjust the bed to a chair position, elevate the head of the bed > 60° for > 1 h, and repeat every 2 h if tolerated by the patient
Grade 2
Perform step 4, adjusting the bed into a heart failure chair position for > 1 h, and if the patient tolerates it, repeat the above every 2 h for > 4 h at a time. Steps 2 to 4 require checking the patient’s tolerance level at least twice every 30 min
Grade 3
Perform step 5, sit at the edge of the bed (target; 20 min) or help the patient to sit at the edge of the bed with minimal assistance, this step requires at least one staff member to help the patient sit and assist the patient to move their lower limbs
Grade 4
Perform step 6, stand at the edge of the bed for > 2 min (goal; twice daily). If possible, try to walk at the edge of the bed for 10 s
Grades 5–6
Perform step 7, move the patient to sit on a chair for > 60 min (goal; 2–3 times daily) and adjust the patient’s sitting position every 1 h, if the patient is unstable during this process, support the patient to the chair with assistance and do not continue to step 8
Grades 7–10
Perform step 8, walking tolerance training (goal; 2-3 times daily), recording the distance the patient walks and assistive devices used
Table 2 Comparison of general demographic and clinical data of post cardiac surgery patients in the two groups
Factors
Observation, n = 60
Control, n = 60
χ2
P value
Sex
Men
40
31
2.794
0.095
Women
20
29
Age
18–30
0
1
2.588
0.662
31–50
11
11
51–60
23
17
61–70
16
21
70 above
10
10
Occupation
Farmer
54
54
1.612
0.816
Laborer
1
3
Retired
2
1
Other
3
2
APACHE-II
1–10
16
19
3.088
0.244
11–20
37
39
21–30
7
2
Diagnosis
Heart valve disease
34
34
0
1
Coronary heart disease
18
18
Aortic dissection
8
8
Surgical procedure
Heart valve replacement + plasty
21
26
2.037
0.361
Coronary bypass
18
20
Aortic replacement + plasty
21
14
Table 3 Comparison of the revised pelme critical patient activity score between the two groups of postoperative cardiac patients
Group
Cases
PermeScore
Of them
Activity upon request
Impaired mobility
Bed mobility
Underbed mobility
Observation
60
25.98 ± 0.97
7
1.1
5.8
12.1
Control
60
22.63 ± 1.08
7
1
5.35
9.2
t
-17.83
P value
P < 0.005
Table 4 Comparison of rehabilitation indexes between two groups of postoperative cardiac patients (mean ± SD)
Group
Cases
Duration of mechanical ventilation (h)
Length of ICU stay (d)
Observation
60
18.30 ± 3.28
4.04 ± 0.83
Control
60
21.59 ± 7.93
4.66 ± 2.19
t
2.97
2.038
P value
P < 0.05
P < 0.05
Table 5 Comparison of the incidence of complications or adverse events between the two groups of postoperative cardiac patients (cases), n (%)
Group
Cases
Number of cases
pulmonary atelectasis
arrhythmia
Poor incision healing
Pipe Slip
Total
Observation
60
2
1
1
0
0
4 (6.7)
Control
60
9
4
3
1
1
18 (30.0)
χ2
4.904
P value
P < 0.05
Citation: Wang L, Lu JY, Ma XX, Ma LO. Study of the intensive care unit activity scale in the early rehabilitation of patients after direct cardiac surgery. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(26): 5930-5936