Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2024; 12(26): 5885-5892
Published online Sep 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i26.5885
Published online Sep 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i26.5885
Table 1 Patient demographic data, mean ± SD
Nonretrograde group | Retrograde group | t value | P value | |
Age (year) | 51.7 ± 10.6 | 52.4 ± 11.3 | 0.258 | 0.797 |
Sex (male/female) | 18/54 | 4/15 | 0.128 | 0.721 |
Operation time (minute) | 257.3 ± 46.9 | 264.7 ± 43.8 | 0.619 | 0.540 |
Blood loss (mL) | 219.6 ± 49.3 | 207.7± 56.5 | 0.907 | 0.367 |
Follow-up time (month) | 27.4 ± 6.3 | 26.9 ± 7.0 | ||
Fixed segment | 2.4 ±0.69 | 2.5 ± 0.74 | 0.554 | 0.581 |
Fusion segment | ||||
1 | 59 | 14 | 0.646 | 0.421 |
2 | 13 | 5 | ||
Fixation of S1 | ||||
Yes | 12 | 5 | 0.921 | 0.337 |
No | 60 | 14 |
Table 2 Radiography parameters of the two groups, mean ± SD
Nonretrograde group | Retrograde group | t value | P value | |
PI (°) | ||||
Preoperative | 47.9 ± 9.2 | 57.8 ± 10.6 | 4.041 | < 0.001 |
Postoperative | 49.2 ± 9.6 | 58.1 ± 11.4 | 3.454 | 0.008 |
Final follow-up | 49.6 ± 10.3 | 57.2 ± 11.9 | 2.768 | < 0.001 |
PT (°) | ||||
Preoperative | 20.5 ± 6.2 | 21.5 ± 6.4 | 0.621 | 0.536 |
Postoperative | 15.6 ± 4.4 | 14.8 ± 5.6 | 0.665 | 0.508 |
Final follow-up | 14.9 ± 3.9 | 15.3 ± 5.0 | 0.374 | 0.709 |
SS (°) | ||||
Preoperative | 27.9 ± 8.3 | 35.1 ± 8.2 | 3.371 | < 0.001 |
Postoperative | 35.8 ± 7.9 | 42.7 ± 10.8 | 3.123 | 0.002 |
Final follow-up | 37.1 ± 9.4 | 41.9 ± 7.7 | 2.049 | 0.043 |
LL (°) | ||||
Preoperative | 34.1 ± 10.2 | 38.9 ± 14.8 | 1.649 | 0.103 |
Postoperative | 48.7 ± 12.6 | 57.1 ± 10.6 | 2.664 | 0.009 |
Final follow-up | 48.9 ± 9.7 | 56.3 ± 9.2 | 2.988 | 0.003 |
lLL (°) | ||||
Preoperative | 24.9 ± 4.8 | 27.0 ± 6.8 | 1.546 | 0.126 |
Postoperative | 38.1 ± 8.9 | 38.7 ± 9.9 | 0.255 | 0.799 |
Final follow-up | 37.4 ± 9.6 | 38.9 ± 8.5 | 0.619 | 0.537 |
uLL (°) | ||||
Preoperative | 8.1 ± 3.4 | 10.9 ± 4.7 | 2.934 | 0.004 |
Postoperative | 12.5 ± 4.3 | 18.2 ± 6.4 | 4.605 | < 0.001 |
Final follow-up | 12.7 ± 5.6 | 17.6 ± 5.4 | 3.417 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Lumbar sagittal images of the patients in the two groups, mean ± SD
Nonretrograde group | Retrograde group | t value | P value | |
|PI-LL| (°) | ||||
Preoperative | 13.9 ± 5.2 | 15.3 ± 5.8 | 1.019 | 0.311 |
Postoperative | 1.9 ± 4.3 | 1.4 ± 3.6 | 0.465 | 0.643 |
Final follow-up | 0.9 ± 2.1 | 1.2 ± 3.0 | 0.671 | 0.504 |
PI-LL matching | ||||
Yes | 63 | 16 | 0.142 | 0.706 |
No | 9 | 3 | ||
LDI (%) | ||||
Preoperative | 75.9 ± 14.9 | 71.1 ± 16.7 | 1.217 | 0.226 |
Postoperative | 75.7 ± 10.4 | 68.1 ± 11.5 | 2.772 | 0.006 |
Final follow-up | 74.3 ± 9.4 | 67.2 ± 11.9 | 2.764 | 0.006 |
Distribution of LL | ||||
LDI < 50% | 6 | 7 | 49.937 | < 0.001 |
50% ≤ LDI < 80% | 64 | 12 | ||
80 ≤ LDI | 2 | 0 |
Table 4 Quality of life of the patients in the two groups, mean ± SD
Nonretrograde group | Retrograde group | t value | P value | |
ODI score | ||||
Preoperative | 41.4 ± 11.9 | 40.8 ± 10.3 | 0.201 | 0.841 |
Postoperative | 21.1 ± 7.2 | 26.1 ± 7.4 | 2.677 | < 0.001 |
Final follow-up | 18.0 ± 6.3 | 24.2 ± 4.6 | 4.009 | < 0.001 |
VAS score | ||||
Preoperative | 7.0 ± 2.2 | 7.4 ± 2.5 | 0.685 | 0.495 |
Postoperative | 2.2 ± 1.2 | 3.1 ± 1.6 | 2.703 | 0.008 |
Final follow-up | 1.8 ± 1.1 | 2.9 ± 1.4 | 3.654 | < 0.001 |
- Citation: Zhu JJ, Wang Y, Zheng J, Du SY, Cao L, Yang YM, Zhang QX, Xie DD. Risk factors and clinical significance of posterior slip of the proximal vertebral body after lower lumbar fusion. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(26): 5885-5892
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i26/5885.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i26.5885