Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2024; 12(22): 4992-4998
Published online Aug 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i22.4992
Table 1 Comparative analysis of baseline data
Factors
Control group (n = 59)
Observation group (n = 60)
χ2/t
P value
Age (years)46.29 ± 6.4745.97 ± 5.330.2950.769
Disease course (months)5.98 ± 0.946.17 ± 1.450.8470.399
Body mass (kg)60.83 ± 7.0560.05 ± 7.710.5760.566
Kupperman index (points)28.51 ± 10.3730.25 ± 11.890.8500.397
Family medical history1.2450.265
With, n (%)9 (15.25)14 (23.33)
Without, n (%)50 (84.75)46 (76.67)
Table 2 Comparative analysis of clinical effectiveness, n (%)
Efficacy assessment
Control group (n = 59)
Observation group (n = 60)
χ2
P value
Markedly effective18 (30.51)35 (58.33)
Effective24 (40.68)21 (35.00)
Ineffective17 (28.81)4 (6.67)
Total effective rate42 (71.19)56 (93.33)10.0400.002
Table 3 Comparative analysis of safety, n (%)
Adverse reactions
Control group (n = 59)
Observation group (n = 60)
χ2
P value
Dizziness and headache2 (3.39)0 (0.00)
Nausea and vomiting3 (5.08)0 (0.00)
Breast tenderness4 (6.78)2 (3.33)
Total9 (15.25)2 (3.33)5.0390.025