Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4265-4271
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4265
Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4265
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups
Group | n | Age in yr | Height in cm | Weight in kg | Operation time in min | Anesthesia time in min | Intraoperative blood loss in mL | Intraoperative fluid volume in mL |
Control group | 50 | 45.56 ± 6.71 | 160.56 ± 5.26 | 58.23 ± 5.79 | 123.36 ± 14.85 | 125.87 ± 15.66 | 134.12 ± 15.22 | 1345.26 ± 74.25 |
Observation group | 50 | 46.02 ± 6.34 | 161.04 ± 5.11 | 57.69 ± 6.21 | 121.26 ± 15.07 | 124.78 ± 14.98 | 130.25 ± 16.89 | 1331.56 ± 81.02 |
t | 0.352 | 0.463 | 0.450 | 0.702 | 0.356 | 1.204 | 0.881 | |
P value | 0.725 | 1.984 | 0.654 | 1.984 | 0.723 | 0.232 | 0.380 |
Table 2 Comparison of visual simulation rating scores between the two groups
Group | n | 4 h after surgery | 6 h after surgery | 12 h after surgery | 24 h after surgery | 36 h after surgery | 48 h after surgery |
Control group | 50 | 2.72 ± 0.56 | 3.21 ± 0.47 | 3.07 ± 0.41 | 3.19 ± 0.37 | 2.89 ± 0.41 | 2.54 ± 0.36 |
Observation group | 50 | 2.16 ± 0.41 | 2.34 ± 0.38 | 2.22 ± 0.39 | 2.14 ± 0.34 | 2.06 ± 0.32 | 1.78 ± 0.31 |
t | 5.705 | 10.178 | 10.622 | 14.776 | 11.284 | 11.312 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison of sedation scores between the two groups
Group | n | 4 h after surgery | 6 h after surgery | 12 h after surgery | 24 h after surgery | 36 h after surgery | 48 h after surgery |
Control group | 50 | 2.73 ± 0.37 | 2.39 ± 0.41 | 2.01 ± 0.32 | 2.05 ± 0.36 | 1.97 ± 0.32 | 1.35 ± 0.26 |
Observation group | 50 | 2.74 ± 0.35 | 2.32 ± 0.39 | 1.96 ± 0.29 | 2.02 ± 0.32 | 1.92 ± 0.25 | 1.33 ± 0.24 |
t | 0.139 | 0.875 | 0.819 | 0.440 | 0.871 | 0.400 | |
P value | 0.900 | 0.384 | 0.415 | 0.661 | 0.386 | 0.690 |
Table 4 Comparison of postoperative recovery indexes between the two groups
Group | n | Get out of bed time in h | Bowel sounds recovery time in h | Anal exhaust in h | Postoperative hospital stay in d |
Control group | 50 | 13.58 ± 3.14 | 16.98 ± 3.82 | 22.36 ± 2.13 | 3.89 ± 1.02 |
Observation group | 50 | 10.41 ± 2.56 | 13.84 ± 2.59 | 18.74 ± 2.25 | 3.81 ± 1.14 |
t | 5.533 | 4.811 | 8.262 | 0.370 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.712 |
Table 5 Comparison of stress-related indicators between the two groups
Group | n | Cor in nmol/L | Blood sugar in mmol/L | ||||||
1 d before surgery | 6 h after surgery | 12 h after surgery | 24 h after surgery | 1 d before surgery | 6 h after surgery | 12 h after surgery | 24 h after surgery | ||
Control group | 50 | 285.63 ± 37.14 | 378.59 ± 48.77a | 492.05 ± 74.63a | 472.23 ± 67.85a | 5.12 ± 0.36 | 6.15 ± 0.41a | 7.14 ± 0.45a | 6.97 ± 0.42a |
Observation group | 50 | 279.93 ± 41.78 | 368.74 ± 45.45a | 441.74 ± 64.27a | 389.62 ± 61.04a | 5.15 ± 0.34 | 6.08 ± 0.39a | 6.61 ± 0.42a | 6.15 ± 0.35a |
t | 0.721 | 1.045 | 3.612 | 6.400 | 0.428 | 0.875 | 6.088 | 10.606 | |
P value | 0.473 | 0.299 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.669 | 0.384 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 6 Comparison of polysomnography parameters between the two groups
Group | n | 1 d before surgery | 1 d after surgery | 2 d after surgery | 1 d before surgery | 1 d after surgery | 2 d after surgery |
TST in min | SE, % | ||||||
Control group | 50 | 465.25 ± 47.85 | 358.12 ± 31.05a | 382.02 ± 38.96a | 96.58 ± 5.02 | 72.26 ± 4.22a | 82.69 ± 4.91a |
Observation group | 50 | 471.56 ± 42.93 | 389.96 ± 35.22a | 418.96 ± 42.56a | 95.23 ± 5.27 | 79.56 ± 4.41a | 87.16 ± 5.11a |
t | 0.694 | 4.795 | 4.527 | 1.312 | 4.981 | 4.460 | |
P value | 0.489 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 1.984 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
REMS, % | AI, n/h | ||||||
Control group | 50 | 20.85 ± 3.12 | 14.02 ± 2.16a | 15.89 ± 2.11a | 1.54 ± 0.48 | 4.25 ± 0.63a | 4.09 ± 0.45a |
Observation group | 50 | 20.79 ± 3.25 | 17.85 ± 2.48a | 19.08 ± 2.37a | 1.57 ± 0.45 | 3.17 ± 0.55a | 2.61 ± 0.37a |
t | 0.094 | 8.235 | 7.109 | 0.322 | 9.132 | 17.963 | |
P value | 0.925 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.748 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 7 Comparison of patient-controlled epidural analgesia compressions between the two groups
Group | n | Average number of compressions | Average number of effective compressions |
Control group | 50 | 2.02 ± 0.47 | 1.88 ± 0.44 |
Observation group | 50 | 1.83 ± 0.41 | 1.75 ± 0.38 |
t | 8.956 | 1.581 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.117 |
- Citation: Ning FF, Yao TT, Wang XX. Application of dezocine patient-controlled epidural analgesia in postoperative analgesia in patients with total myomectomy. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4265-4271
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i20/4265.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4265