Bao DY, Wu LY, Cheng QY. Effect of a comprehensive geriatric assessment nursing intervention model on older patients with diabetes and hypertension. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4065-4073 [PMID: 39015917 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4065]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Qi-Yan Cheng, BSc, Nurse, Department of Endocrinology, Jiangyin Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 130 Renmin Middle Road, Jiangyin 214400, Jiangsu Province, China. cqy17768@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Nursing
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Cohort Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jul 16, 2024; 12(20): 4065-4073 Published online Jul 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i20.4065
Table 1 Scales
Scales
Objects
Criteria
MBI
Physical function
The total score was 100 points, with classifications as follows: 75–95 (mild dependence), 50–70 (moderate dependence), 25–45 (severe dependence), and 0–20 points (full dependence)[9,10]
GDS
Depression level
The total score was 30 points, indicating depressive symptoms if > 11 points were scored[11]
HAMA
Anxiety levels
The total score was 50 points, with classifications as follows: ≥ 29 (severe anxiety), 21–28 (marked anxiety), 14–20 (moderate anxiety), and 7–13 points (mild anxiety)[12]
MNA
Nutritional status
The total score was 30 points, with classifications as follows: > 24 (good), 17–24 (possible malnutrition), and < 17 points (malnutrition)[13]
MoCA
Cognitive function
The total score was 30 points, wherein < 26 points indicate cognitive impairment[14]
PSQI
Sleep quality
The total score was 21 points, with classifications as follows: 0–5 (good quality), 6–10 (general), 11–15 (poor), and 16–21 points (fairly poor)[15]
Table 2 Blood glucose control target in older patients with diabetes
Blood glucose test indicators
No hypoglycemic risk drugs
Use of hypoglycemic risk drugs
Good
Medium
Poor
Good
Medium
Poor
HbA1c (mmol/L)
< 7.5
< 8.0
< 8.5
7.0–7.5
7.5–8.0
8.0–8.5
FBG (mmol/L)
5.0–7.2
5.0–8.3
5.6–10.0
5.0–8.3
5.6–8.3
5.6–10.0
2hPBG (mmol/L)
5.0–8.3
5.6–10.0
6.1–11.1
5.6–10.0
8.3–10.0
8.3–13.9
Table 3 General data between the two groups of patients
Study group (n = 40)
Control group (n = 40)
t/χ2 value
P value
Male/female
19/21
22/18
0.450
0.502
Age (yr)
70.35 ± 4.26
71.20 ± 4.18
0.901
0.370
Diabetes course (yr)
9.13 ± 2.26
8.80 ± 2.24
0.646
0.520
Hypertension course (yr)
5.30 ± 1.09
5.28 ± 0.72
0.121
0.904
Table 4 Changes in blood glucose indicators before and after intervention in the two groups (n = 40)
Citation: Bao DY, Wu LY, Cheng QY. Effect of a comprehensive geriatric assessment nursing intervention model on older patients with diabetes and hypertension. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(20): 4065-4073