Zhang ZH, Chang FJ, Chen Y. Clinical efficacy of magnetic vibration magnetoelectric therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitischronic pelvic pain syndrome. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(19): 3837-3844 [PMID: 38994312 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3837]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Yun Chen, MD, Chief Physician, Professor, Department of Men, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, No. 155 Hanzhong Road, Qinhuai District, Nanjing 210029, Jiangsu Province, China. szyycy2024@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Andrology
Article-Type of This Article
Observational Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Jul 6, 2024; 12(19): 3837-3844 Published online Jul 6, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i19.3837
Table 1 Treatment efficiency
Cure
Excellence
Effective
Ineffective
Total effectiveness
N
0
3
35
27
38
Percentage
0
4.6
53.8
41.5
58.5
Table 2 Comparison of patients' national institutes of health-chronic prostatitis symptom index scores before and after treatment
Parameter
Pre-treatment (n = 65)
Post-treatment (n = 65)
P value
NIH-CPSI, (mean ± SD)
Total score
23.29 ± 7.89
15.23 ± 5.67
P < 0.001
Pain subscales
11.38 ± 4.61
7.45 ± 3.93
P < 0.001
Q1-3
7 ± 2.67
4.74 ± 2.59
P < 0.001
Q4
4.38 ± 2.51
2.71 ± 1.79
P < 0.001
Urinary subscales
4.26 ± 2.35
2.43 ± 1.32
P < 0.001
Q5
2.22 ± 1.49
1.25 ± 0.9
P < 0.001
Q6
2.05 ± 1.3
1.18 ± 0.73
P < 0.001
QoL subscales
7.65 ± 2.41
5.35 ± 2.16
P < 0.001
Q7-8
3.54 ± 1.56
4.38 ± 2.51
P = 0.0012 < 0.01
Q9
4.11 ± 1.08
3.08 ± 1.15
P < 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of patients' international index of erectile function 5 and premature ejaculation diagnostic tool scores before and after treatment
Pre-treatment
Post-treatment
P value
IIEF-5, (mean ± SD)
15.92 ± 5.02
17.14 ± 4.81
P = 0.0005 < 0.001
PEDT, (mean ± SD)
8.51 ± 4.31
6.63 ± 3.63
P = 0.001 < 0.05
Table 4 Comparison of patients' Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Patient Health Questionnaire and The Pain Catastrophizing Scale scores before and after treatment
Parameter
Pre-treatment
Post-treatment
P value
GAD, (mean ± SD)
9.4 ± 5.52
4.38 ± 4.1
P < 0.001
PHQ, (mean ± SD)
7.65 ± 6.3
4.05 ± 3.9
P < 0.001
PCS, (mean ± SD)
13.55 ± 11.43
7.83 ± 7.42
P < 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of patients' traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores before and after treatment
Parameter
Pre-treatment
Post-treatment
P value
TCMS, (mean ± SD)
21.35 ± 10
9.42 ± 7.4
P < 0.001
Citation: Zhang ZH, Chang FJ, Chen Y. Clinical efficacy of magnetic vibration magnetoelectric therapy in the treatment of chronic prostatitischronic pelvic pain syndrome. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(19): 3837-3844