Copyright
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2024; 12(17): 3019-3026
Published online Jun 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3019
Published online Jun 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3019
Table 1 General data analysis
Factors | Observation group (n = 40) | Control group (n = 40) | χ2/t/Z | P value |
Sex | 0.208 | 0.648 | ||
Male | 25 (62.5) | 23 (57.5) | ||
Female | 15 (37.5) | 17 (42.5) | ||
Age | 58.68 ± 14.85 | 62.50 ± 17.11 | -1.068 | 0.289 |
Course of disease | 6.50 (5.00, 16.50) | 6.00 (4.00, 12.00) | -0.560 | 0.575 |
Table 2 Comparison of effective rates, n (%)
Groups | n | Curative effect | Response rate | Marked response rate | |||
Non-response | Response | Marked response | Cure | ||||
Observation group | 40 | 0 (0.0) | 5 (12.5) | 31 (77.5) | 4 (10.0) | 40 (100.0) | 35 (87.5) |
Control group | 40 | 4 (10.0) | 15 (37.5) | 19 (47.5) | 2 (5.0) | 36 (90.0) | 21 (52.5) |
χ2 | 11.667 | ||||||
P value | 0.1161 | 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of Eczema Area and Severity Index and Visual Analogue Scale scores (points)
Groups | n | EASI score | VAS score | ||||||
Before treatment | After treatment | t value | P value | Before treatment | After treatment | t value | P value | ||
Observation group | 40 | 7.52 ± 3.25 | 2.22 ± 1.30 | 12.002 | 0 | 6.05 ± 1.54 | 1.98 ± 1.07 | 21.747 | 0 |
Control group | 40 | 7.30 ± 3.96 | 3.19 ± 2.52 | 9.058 | 0 | 6.08 ± 1.72 | 2.93 ± 1.27 | 12.498 | 0 |
t value | 0.278 | −2.17 | −0.069 | −3.615 | |||||
P value | 0.782 | 0.034 | 0.945 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of INF-γ, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 levels between the case and control groups
Parameters | Case group | Healthy control group | t value | P value |
INF-γ | 311.75 ± 136.86 | 399.17 ± 129.35 | -2.582 | 0.011 |
IL-2 | 35.54 ± 19.11 | 57.25 ± 20.51 | -4.479 | 0.000 |
IL-4 | 79.40 ± 9.62 | 60.72 ± 9.99 | 7.712 | 0.000 |
IL-10 | 66.00 ± 8.78 | 56.16 ± 6.90 | 4.659 | 0.000 |
Table 5 Comparison of INF-γ, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 levels between the observation and control groups before and after treatment
Parameters | Time point | Observation group | Control group | t value | P value |
INF-γ | Before treatment | 321.29 ± 135.22 | 302.21 ± 139.53 | 0.621 | 0.536 |
After treatment | 394.88 ± 115.70a | 334.38 ± 137.47 | 2.13 | 0.036 | |
IL-2 | Before treatment | 38.15 ± 19.98 | 32.93 ± 18.07 | 1.224 | 0.225 |
After treatment | 56.51 ± 18.00a | 47.13 ± 20.04a | 2.203 | 0.031 | |
IL-4 | Before treatment | 81.01 ± 8.78 | 77.79 ± 10.25 | 1.508 | 0.136 |
After treatment | 61.31 ± 7.60a | 67.20 ± 9.00a | −3.165 | 0.002 | |
IL-10 | Before treatment | 65.94 ± 8.85 | 66.06 ± 8.83 | −0.063 | 0.95 |
After treatment | 60.55 ± 11.86a | 62.00 ± 8.84a | −0.623 | 0.535 |
Table 6 Adverse reaction and recurrence rates, n (%)
Groups | Adverse reactions | Recurrence |
Observation group | 1 (2.5) | 3 (7.5) |
Control group | 0 (0.0) | 7 (17.5) |
χ2 | 1.829 | |
P value | 1.000 | 0.176 |
- Citation: Gan HH, Yang G, Shen TT. Efficacy of acupoint injection in the treatment of chronic eczema and its influence on peripheral blood T cells. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12(17): 3019-3026
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v12/i17/3019.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i17.3019