Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 16, 2023; 11(5): 1058-1067
Published online Feb 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.1058
Published online Feb 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.1058
Table 1 Comparison of general information of each group (mean ± SD)
Group | Gender | Age (yr) | BMI (kg/m2) | |
Male | Female | |||
Control (n = 50) | 22 | 28 | 53.25 ± 4.67 | 22.53 ± 3.67 |
Observation (n = 75) | 38 | 37 | 51.34 ± 7.56 | 23.45 ± 4.23 |
χ2/t | 0.584 | 1.594 | 1.255 | |
P value | 0.465 | 0.114 | 0.212 |
Table 2 Comparison of soluble interleukin-2 receptor, interleukin-17, and interleukin-35 levels in each group (mean ± SD)
Group | sIL-2R (U/mL) | IL-17 (pg/mL) | IL-35 (pg/mL) | |||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
Control (n = 50) | 546.78 ± 36.67 | 435.26 ± 26.47 | 15.67 ± 2.44 | 10.27 ± 2.32 | 56.59 ± 7.23 | 68.78 ± 6.34 |
Observation (n = 75) | 545.56 ± 34.12 | 359.56 ± 21.98 | 14.78 ± 2.65 | 6.79 ± 2.78 | 57.67 ± 7.15 | 94.98 ± 6.78 |
t | 0.190 | 17.370 | 1.898 | 7.313 | 0.061 | 21.716 |
P value | 0.849 | < 0.001 | 0.060 | < 0.001 | 0.951 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of free triiodothyronine and free tetraiodothyronine levels in each group (mean ± SD)
Group | FT3 (ng/L) | FT4 (ng/L) | ||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
Control (n = 50) | 1.54 ± 0.23 | 2.23 ± 1.62 | 0.50 ± 0.16 | 0.89 ± 0.82 |
Observation (n = 75) | 1.58 ± 0.27 | 3.12 ± 1.65 | 0.48 ± 0.11 | 1.56 ± 1.48 |
t | 0.860 | 2.976 | 0.829 | 2.914 |
P value | 0.392 | 0.004 | 0.409 | 0.004 |
Table 4 Levels of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ in each group (mean ± SD)
Group | CD3+ (%) | CD4+ (%) | CD8+ (%) | |||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
Control (n = 50) | 53.56 ± 6.23 | 61.21 ± 6.32 | 25.87 ± 6.56 | 46.87 ± 6.76 | 39.98 ± 5.21 | 35.65 ± 9.67 |
Observation (n = 75) | 52.45 ± 5.72 | 64.98 ± 6.56 | 26.78 ± 6.48 | 49.78 ± 5.65 | 41.34 ± 5.45 | 29.87 ± 9.87 |
t | 1.026 | 3.194 | 0.765 | 2.606 | 1.391 | 3.233 |
P value | 0.307 | 0.002 | 0.446 | 0.010 | 0.167 | 0.002 |
Table 5 Levels of CD44V6 and tumor supplied group of factor in each group (mean ± SD)
Group | CD44V6 (ng/mL) | TSGF (ng/mL) | ||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | |
Control (n = 50) | 512.45 ± 33.06 | 367.56 ± 24.67 | 74.35 ± 6.57 | 56.87 ± 5.76 |
Observation (n = 75) | 513.52 ± 34.11 | 314.23 ± 20.12 | 72.78 ± 6.54 | 42.38 ± 5.21 |
t | 0.174 | 12.719 | 1.312 | 14.600 |
P value | 0.862 | < 0.001 | 0.192 | < 0.001 |
Table 6 Comparison of adverse reactions in each group, n (%)
Group | Rash | Osteoporosis | Recurrence | Overall incidence |
Control (n = 50) | 2 (4.00) | 3 (6.00) | 3 (6.00) | 13 (26.00) |
Observation (n = 75) | 4 (5.33) | 4 (5.33) | 6 (8.00) | 17 (22.67) |
χ2 | 0.932 | 0.874 | 0.672 | 0.961 |
P value | 0.733 | 0.812 | 0.944 | 0.111 |
- Citation: Liang JJ, Feng WJ, Li R, Xu RT, Liang YL. Analysis of the value and safety of thyroid-stimulating hormone in the clinical efficacy of patients with thyroid cancer. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(5): 1058-1067
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i5/1058.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.1058