Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 16, 2023; 11(35): 8247-8255
Published online Dec 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i35.8247
Published online Dec 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i35.8247
Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Transtibial | Less surgical trauma; few complications[17] | Poor rotational stability of the knee joint; cartilage degeneration occurred earlier after surgery[14] |
Anteromedial | The femoral tunnel was accurately positioned; better rotational stability[18,19] | The femoral tunnel is short; breaking the femoral cortex; a risk of injury to the common peroneal nerve[24,25] |
Outside-in | Larger tendon-bone interface contact area[22] | Add auxiliary incision |
Over-the-top | Reduce femoral inlet graft wear | Need to practice the technique[32,33] |
Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages |
Aperture fixation | High fixation strength[67] | Meta obstructing postoperative evaluation; the degradation rate of absorbable materials is not completely controllable[63-66] |
Cortical suspension fixation | Adjustable length is easy to use | The probability of complications such as bungee jumping effect and wiper effect increased; bone tunnel enlargement[68,69] |
Transverse nail fixation | More tendon-bone contact area; uniform resistance distribution[9,71] | Risk of nail breakage |
- Citation: Dai Y, Gao WJ, Li WC, Xiang XX, Wang WM. Research progress on preparation of lateral femoral tunnel and graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(35): 8247-8255
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i35/8247.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i35.8247