Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2023; 11(26): 6083-6090
Published online Sep 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i26.6083
Table 1 Comparison of the clinical outcomes between the two study groups
Group
CR, n (%)
PR, n (%)
SD, n (%)
PD, n (%)
ORR (%)
FLOT group (n = 42)0 (0.00)23 (54.76)14 (33.33)5 (11.90)54.76
SOX group (n = 42)0 (0.00)14 (33.33)15 (35.71)13 (30.95)33.33
Table 2 Comparison of the tumor marker levels between the two groups before and after treatment (mean ± SD)
GroupCEA (ng/mL)
CA199 (U/mL)
TPS (U/L)
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
Before treatment
After treatment
FLOT group (n = 42)40.16 ± 8.8433.79 ± 5.76a45.76 ± 10.1424.07 ± 4.67a160.27 ± 31.6947.63 ± 5.09a
SOX group (n = 42)39.41 ± 8.2337.31 ± 7.64a46.51 ± 10.6329.74 ± 6.52a162.34 ± 27.3262.31 ± 7.62a
t-value0.4022.3840.3314.5820.32110.382
P value> 0.05< 0.05> 0.05< 0.05> 0.05< 0.05
Table 3 Comparison of the adverse reactions between the two study groups, n (%)
Group
Level
Skin reactions on hands and feet
Peripheral neuritis
Vomiting
Diarrhea
Abnormal liver function
Leukopenia
FLOT group (n = 42)Level 0 to 2; Level 3 & 441 (97.62); 1 (2.38)41 (97.62); 1 (2.38)38 (90.48); 4 (9.52)39 (92.86); 3 (7.14)40 (95.24); 2 (4.76)25 (59.52); 17 (40.48)
SOX group (n = 42)Level 0 to 2; Level 3 & 434 (80.95); 8 (19.05)a42 (100.00); 0 (0.00)40 (95.24); 2 (4.76)40 (95.24); 2 (4.76)41 (97.62); 1 (2.38)35 (83.33); 7 (16.67)a
Table 4 Cox regression analysis to predict the effect of first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Related factors
HR
95%CI
Standard error
P value
bFGF (pg/mL)2.9171.066-7.9780.5130.037
IL-1β (pg/mL)1.1551.062-3.1240.5630.078
TNF-α (μg/L)1.0370.669-2.1400.4360.092
Single organ transfer0.0730.019-1.3200.7210.541
Multi-organ metastases1.0240.725-1.9250.5470.354
Tumor location1.0930.763-1.7240.8520.320
Tissue differentiation1.1150.975-1.5200.9730.163