Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2022; 10(34): 12551-12558
Published online Dec 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12551
Published online Dec 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12551
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups, n (%)
| Indicators | Study group (n = 45) | Control group (n = 45) | P value |
| Gender (M/F) | 24/21 | 26/19 | > 0.05 |
| Age (yr) | 47.62 ± 16.05 | 48.13 ± 14.69 | > 0.05 |
| Education | > 0.05 | ||
| Primary school and below | 12 (26.67) | 10 (22.22) | |
| Junior high school and high school | 21 (46.67) | 24 (53.33) | |
| College or above | 12 (26.67) | 11 (24.44) |
Table 2 Comparison of heart rate and blood pressure between the two groups (mean ± SD)
| Time | Indicators | Study group (n = 45) | Control group (n = 45) | P value |
| Before inspection | Heart rate (beats/min) | 88.58 ± 6.74 | 89.42 ± 7.09 | > 0.05 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 89.21 ± 5.35 | 88.37 ± 6.44 | > 0.05 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 128.06 ± 7.99 | 130.14 ± 8.35 | > 0.05 | |
| In Inspection | Heart rate (beats/min) | 93.11 ± 6.95 | 104.45 ± 7.37 | < 0.05 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 93.69 ± 6.14 | 100.15 ± 7.02 | < 0.05 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 132.25 ± 7.67 | 139.63 ± 8.05 | < 0.05 | |
| After inspection | Heart rate (beats/min) | 91.08 ± 7.32 | 95.96 ± 9.05 | < 0.05 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 92.11 ± 6.48 | 95.06 ± 5.52 | < 0.05 | |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 131.42 ± 6.64 | 136.65 ± 5.71 | < 0.05 |
Table 3 Comparison of depression and anxiety between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
| Time | Indicators | Study group (n = 45) | Control group (n = 45) | P value |
| Before inspection | SDS | 62.42 ± 6.01 | 63.06 ± 5.64 | > 0.05 |
| SAS | 61.79 ± 5.45 | 62.29 ± 6.37 | > 0.05 | |
| After inspection | SDS | 41.15 ± 4.51 | 46.05 ± 5.07 | < 0.05 |
| SAS | 42.46 ± 5.19 | 47.71 ± 5.62 | < 0.05 |
Table 4 Comparison of test fit between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | Number of cases | Complete fit | Basic fit | Uncooperative | Check fit |
| Study group | 45 | 31 (68.89) | 13 (28.89) | 1 (2.22) | 44 (97.78) |
| Control group | 45 | 27 (60.00) | 11 (24.44) | 7 (15.56) | 38 (84.44) |
| P value | < 0.05 |
Table 5 Comparison of intervention satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
| Group | Number of cases | Very satisfied | Generally satisfied | Not satisfied | Total satisfaction |
| Study group | 45 | 30 (66.67) | 13 (28.89) | 2 (4.44) | 43 (95.56) |
| Control group | 45 | 25 (55.56) | 12 (26.67) | 8 (17.78) | 37 (82.22) |
| P value | < 0.05 |
- Citation: Gong WN, Zhang YH, Niu J, Li XB. Effect of teach-back health education combined with structured psychological nursing on adverse emotion and patient cooperation during 99mTc-3PRGD2.SPECT/CT. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(34): 12551-12558
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i34/12551.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12551
