Gong WN, Zhang YH, Niu J, Li XB. Effect of teach-back health education combined with structured psychological nursing on adverse emotion and patient cooperation during 99mTc-3PRGD2.SPECT/CT. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(34): 12551-12558 [PMID: 36579107 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12551]
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Dec 6, 2022; 10(34): 12551-12558 Published online Dec 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i34.12551
Table 1 Comparison of general data between the two groups, n (%)
Indicators
Study group (n = 45)
Control group (n = 45)
P value
Gender (M/F)
24/21
26/19
> 0.05
Age (yr)
47.62 ± 16.05
48.13 ± 14.69
> 0.05
Education
> 0.05
Primary school and below
12 (26.67)
10 (22.22)
Junior high school and high school
21 (46.67)
24 (53.33)
College or above
12 (26.67)
11 (24.44)
Table 2 Comparison of heart rate and blood pressure between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Time
Indicators
Study group (n = 45)
Control group (n = 45)
P value
Before inspection
Heart rate (beats/min)
88.58 ± 6.74
89.42 ± 7.09
> 0.05
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
89.21 ± 5.35
88.37 ± 6.44
> 0.05
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
128.06 ± 7.99
130.14 ± 8.35
> 0.05
In Inspection
Heart rate (beats/min)
93.11 ± 6.95
104.45 ± 7.37
< 0.05
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
93.69 ± 6.14
100.15 ± 7.02
< 0.05
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
132.25 ± 7.67
139.63 ± 8.05
< 0.05
After inspection
Heart rate (beats/min)
91.08 ± 7.32
95.96 ± 9.05
< 0.05
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
92.11 ± 6.48
95.06 ± 5.52
< 0.05
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)
131.42 ± 6.64
136.65 ± 5.71
< 0.05
Table 3 Comparison of depression and anxiety between the two groups (mean ± SD, points)
Time
Indicators
Study group (n = 45)
Control group (n = 45)
P value
Before inspection
SDS
62.42 ± 6.01
63.06 ± 5.64
> 0.05
SAS
61.79 ± 5.45
62.29 ± 6.37
> 0.05
After inspection
SDS
41.15 ± 4.51
46.05 ± 5.07
< 0.05
SAS
42.46 ± 5.19
47.71 ± 5.62
< 0.05
Table 4 Comparison of test fit between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Number of cases
Complete fit
Basic fit
Uncooperative
Check fit
Study group
45
31 (68.89)
13 (28.89)
1 (2.22)
44 (97.78)
Control group
45
27 (60.00)
11 (24.44)
7 (15.56)
38 (84.44)
P value
< 0.05
Table 5 Comparison of intervention satisfaction between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Number of cases
Very satisfied
Generally satisfied
Not satisfied
Total satisfaction
Study group
45
30 (66.67)
13 (28.89)
2 (4.44)
43 (95.56)
Control group
45
25 (55.56)
12 (26.67)
8 (17.78)
37 (82.22)
P value
< 0.05
Citation: Gong WN, Zhang YH, Niu J, Li XB. Effect of teach-back health education combined with structured psychological nursing on adverse emotion and patient cooperation during 99mTc-3PRGD2.SPECT/CT. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(34): 12551-12558