Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2022; 10(33): 12089-12103
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12089
Published online Nov 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12089
Table 1 Demographic characteristics and clinicopathological characteristics
Variables | Total, n = 151 | Esophagus cancer, n = 151 | |
Adenocarcinoma, n = 74 | Squamous cell carcinoma, n = 77 | ||
Age, yr | |||
Median | 60 | 68.5 | 57 |
Interquartile range | (53-72) | (57-77) | (51-63.5) |
Sex | |||
Female | 22 (14.6%) | 11 (14.9%) | 11 (14.3%) |
Male | 129 (85.4%) | 63 (85.1%) | 66 (85.7%) |
AJCC-TNM Stage | |||
Ⅰ | 18 (11.9%) | 11 (14.9%) | 7 (9.1%) |
Ⅱ | 70 (46.4%) | 24 (32.4%) | 46 (59.7%) |
Ⅲ | 51 (33.8%) | 31 (41.9%) | 20 (26.0%) |
Ⅳ | 12 (7.9%) | 8 (10.8%) | 4 (5.2%) |
EGFR status | |||
Mutant | 5 (3.3%) | 3 (4.1%) | 2 (2.6%) |
Wild-type | 146 (96.7%) | 71 (95.9%) | 75 (97.4%) |
KRAS status | |||
Mutant | 2 (1.3%) | 2 (2.7%) | 0 (0) |
Wild-type | 149 (98.7%) | 72 (97.3%) | 77 (100%) |
BRAF status | |||
Mutant | 1 (0.7%) | 0 (0) | 1 (1.3%) |
Wild-type | 150 (99.3%) | 74 (100%) | 76 (98.7) |
PIK3CA status | |||
Mutant | 14 (9.3%) | 4 (5.4%) | 10 (13.0%) |
Wild-type | 137 (90.7%) | 70 (94.6%) | 67 (87.0%) |
OS event | |||
Event | 58 (38.4%) | 36 (48.6%) | 22 (28.6%) |
Non-event | 93 (61.6%) | 38 (51.4%) | 55 (71.4%) |
OS months | |||
Median | 13.4 | 14.8 | 13.0 |
Range | (7.8-22.9) | (7.3-27.5) | (11.0-18.6) |
PFS event | |||
Event | 73 (48.3%) | 38 (51.4%) | 35 (45.5%) |
Non-event | 78 (51.7%) | 36 (48.6%) | 42 (54.5%) |
PFS months | |||
Median | 10.7 | 10.3 | 10.7 |
Range | (5.1-18.9) | (5.4-24.5) | (3.7-15.8) |
Table 2 Relationship between the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcome
Parameters | Overall survival | Progression-free survival | ||||
Non-event | Event | P value | Non-event | Event | P value | |
Age, yr | 0.758 | 0.628 | ||||
≤ 65 | 57 | 37 | 50 | 44 | ||
> 65 | 36 | 21 | 28 | 29 | ||
Sex | 0.102 | 0.009 | ||||
Female | 17 | 5 | 17 | 5 | ||
Male | 76 | 53 | 61 | 68 | ||
AJCC-TNM stage | 0.021 | 0.013 | ||||
I and II | 61 | 27 | 53 | 35 | ||
III and IV | 32 | 31 | 25 | 38 | ||
Pathological type | 0.011 | 0.469 | ||||
Adenocarcinoma | 38 | 36 | 36 | 38 | ||
SCC | 55 | 22 | 42 | 35 | ||
EGFR status | 0.596 | |||||
Wild-type | 3 | 2 | 0.941 | 2 | 3 | |
Mutant | 90 | 56 | 76 | 70 | ||
BRAF status | 0.428 | 0.332 | ||||
Wild-type | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
Mutant | 92 | 58 | 77 | 73 | ||
KRAS status | 0.734 | 0.962 | ||||
Wild-type | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||
Mutant | 92 | 57 | 77 | 72 | ||
PIK3CA status | 0.828 | 0.896 | ||||
Wild-type | 9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | ||
Mutant | 84 | 53 | 71 | 66 |
Table 3 The results of the univariate Cox regression analysis
Gene name | HR | HR.95L | HR.95H | P value |
PDHA1 | 22.96 | 3.09 | 170.73 | 0.002 |
ATP7A | 3.83 | 0.96 | 15.21 | 0.057 |
CDKN2A | 0.84 | 0.64 | 1.10 | 0.204 |
PDHB | 1.76 | 0.37 | 8.50 | 0.479 |
GLS | 1.50 | 0.48 | 4.67 | 0.484 |
ATP7B | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.71 | 0.496 |
FDX1 | 1.52 | 0.41 | 5.59 | 0.527 |
DLD | 1.82 | 0.27 | 12.11 | 0.534 |
LIPT2 | 0.87 | 0.46 | 1.64 | 0.662 |
DLST | 0.58 | 0.05 | 6.70 | 0.662 |
NFE2L2 | 0.73 | 0.18 | 3.04 | 0.666 |
DLAT | 1.43 | 0.23 | 8.89 | 0.702 |
DBT | 0.83 | 0.27 | 2.54 | 0.744 |
GCSH | 0.87 | 0.32 | 2.36 | 0.777 |
MTF1 | 0.85 | 0.26 | 2.80 | 0.785 |
LIAS | 0.86 | 0.25 | 2.93 | 0.806 |
NLRP3 | 0.91 | 0.44 | 1.90 | 0.809 |
LIPT1 | 1.14 | 0.29 | 4.41 | 0.853 |
SLC31A1 | 1.08 | 0.19 | 6.15 | 0.928 |
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of pyruvate dehydrogenase A1 expression and the clinicopathological factors in the esophagus cancer patients
Variables | Overall survival | Progression-free survival | ||
HR (95%CI of HR) | P value | HR (95%CI of HR) | P value | |
PDHA1 low | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
UVA PDHA1 high | 2.34 (1.42-3.87) | 0.0009 | 1.51 (0.95-2.38) | 0.08 |
MVA PDHA1 high | 1.67 (1.03-2.73) | 0.0386 | ||
Age ≤ 65 | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
Age > 65 | 0.81 (0.47-1.41) | 0.46 | 0.97 (0.60-1.55) | 0.89 |
Sex, Female | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
UVA Male | 2.12 (0.84-5.34) | 0.11 | 2.97 (1.19-7.39) | 0.02 |
MVA Male | 2.27 (0.90- 5.73) | 0.08 | ||
Pathological types, adenocarcinoma | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
SCC | 0.81 (0.47-1.39) | 0.45 | 1.11 (0.70-1.77) | 0.66 |
AJCC stage I, II | 1.00 (Reference) | 1.00 (Reference) | ||
UVA AJCC stage III, IV | 2.53 (1.76-3.64) | 5.86 × 10-7 | 1.98 (1.46-2.67) | 9.48 × 10-6 |
MVA AJCC stage III, IV | 2.30 (1.58-3.35) | 1.46 × 10-5 | 1.86 (1.37-2.52) | 6.98 × 10-5 |
- Citation: Xu H, Du QC, Wang XY, Zhou L, Wang J, Ma YY, Liu MY, Yu H. Comprehensive analysis of the relationship between cuproptosis-related genes and esophageal cancer prognosis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(33): 12089-12103
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i33/12089.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i33.12089