Guo M, Wang M, Chen LL, Wei FJ, Li JE, Lu QX, Zhang L, Yang HX. Effect of intradermal needle therapy at combined acupoints on patients’ gastrointestinal function following surgery for gastrointestinal tumors. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(31): 11427-11441 [PMID: 36387814 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11427]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Hai-Xia Yang, MD, Chief Nurse, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 157 West Five Road, Xincheng District, Xi’an 710004, Shaanxi Province, China. 704287382@qq.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Nov 6, 2022; 10(31): 11427-11441 Published online Nov 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i31.11427
Table 1 Procedures in the intervention group and control group
Components
Intervention group
Control group
Preoperative stage
Counseling and patient education
Patients were educated regarding knowledge of the disease and perioperative cautions, and key points to achieve better cooperation.
Same as the intervention group
Preoperative optimization
The use of tobacco and alcohol was restricted; patients were instructed to perform efficient cough and back percussion and were required to perform activities (e.g., blow balloons or climb stairs) to improve lung function.
Preoperative nutritional care
Using the Nutritional Risk Screening score (NRS 2002) to assess nutritional risk. Patients at risk received oral nutritional supplements for 5–7 d prior to surgery.
Preoperative fasting and carbohydrate loading
Fasting from solid foods for 6 h before surgery; 2–3 h before surgery, patients without diabetes received 200–350 mL of electrolyte drinks under the guidance of dietitians (ingredients: glucose 100 mmol/L, sodium 50 mmol, potassium 20 mmol/L, chloride 50 mmol/L, magnesium 1 mmol/L, phosphorus 2 mmol/L); water was prohibited during the 2 h before surgery.
Intraoperative stage
Optimization of anesthesia
Medium- and short-acting anesthetics were recommended.
Same as the intervention group
Tube placement
Nasogastric tube, abdominal drainage tube or urinary catheter were selectively placed when indicated.
Prevention of intraoperative hypothermia
Intraoperative normothermia was maintained at 36 °C or over, using the following methods. The operating room temperature was set at 26 ℃–27 ℃ before surgery and 30 min before the end of the operation; during the operation, the temperature was set at 22 ℃–23 ℃, and the exposed area of the patient’s body was wrapped with a quilt. The skin antiseptic agent was heated to 40 ℃, and the rinse solution and intravenous infusion fluid were heated to 37 ℃.
Postoperative stage
Postoperative analgesia
Multimodal analgesia: Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and NSAIDs.
Same as the intervention group
Prevention of nausea and vomiting
Antiemetics were appropriately administered to patients based on their number of risk factors.
Tube management
Avoidance or early removal of nasogastric tube, abdominal drainage tube or urinary catheter.
Postoperative early oral intake
Patients were encouraged to drink when they were awake after the operation. If there was no discomfort, a liquid diet was allowed after the first postoperative flatus passage, and the semi flow and general diet were gradually recovered.
Postoperative nutritional care
According to the NRS-2002, oral nutritional supplementation (or additional parenteral nutrition when indicated) was provided for malnourished patients.
Early mobilization
Six hours after recovering from anesthesia, the patients were restricted to the lateral or semi-recumbent position; the patients were allowed to turn over in the bed on the first day, move out of bed on the second day, and stand and walk around on the third day after the operation.
INT
Disinfecting the bilateral acupoints LI-4, PC-6, LR-3, SP-4, ST-36, ST-37, and ST-39 with 75% medical alcohol. Removing the sealing paper from the press needle, then attaching the adhesive tape with press needle to the acupoints. Pressure was applied to the acupoints until the patients experienced local soreness, numbness, and/or pain. The patient or caregiver was instructed to press each acupoint for 2 min at 4–6 h intervals. The press needles were changed every 24 h. INT was performed immediately upon the patient's return to the ward after surgery and continued for seven consecutive days.
The patients in the control group did not receive INT. However, adhesive tapes were attached at their corresponding acupoints with the same appearance as the adhesive tapes with needles applied to the acupoints of the patients in the intervention group.
Table 2 Demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline (n = 64)
Table 3 Intradermal needle therapy effect on postoperative functions
Outcomes
Group
Merged
Subgroup
Gastric cancer
Colon cancer
n
mean ± SD
P value
n
mean ± SD
P value
n
mean ± SD
P value
Time to first flatus passage (h)
Intervention group
32
66 ± 27
< 0.001
12
83 ± 32
0.06
20
56 ± 17
0.002
Control group
32
103 ± 41
16
110 ± 37
16
97 ± 44
Time to first defecation (h)
Intervention group
32
106 ± 44
< 0.001
12
125 ± 36
0.09
20
94 ± 44
0.001
Control group
32
153 ± 50
16
155 ± 48
16
150 ± 53
Time to first oral feeding (h)
Intervention group
32
73 ± 30
< 0.001
12
94 ± 30
0.02
20
61 ± 22
< 0.001
Control group
32
115 ± 38
16
126 ± 35
16
105 ± 40
Table 4 Comparison within and between groups for gastrointestinal symptoms
Measure
Intervention group (n = 32)
Control group (n = 32)
Between-group difference
Mean difference (95%CI)
P value
Mean difference (95%CI)
P value
Mean difference (95%CI)
P value
Abdominal distension
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
-0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
0.26
T2
-0.2 (-0.5, -0.2)
0.72
0.5 (0.2, 0.7)
<0.001
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
< 0.001
T3
-0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
< 0.001
0.2 (-0.3, 0.6)
0.97
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
< 0.001
Nausea
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
0.1 (-0.2, 0.5)
0.46
T2
-0.6 (-0.9, -0.6)
< 0.001
-0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
1.00
-0.5 (-0.8, -0.3)
< 0.001
T3
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
< 0.001
-0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
0.002
-0.3 (-0.5, -0.2)
< 0.001
Vomiting
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
0 (-0.3, 0.3)
0.83
T2
-0.2 (-0.4, 0)
0.02
-0.1 (-0.2, 0.1)
1.00
-0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
0.19
T3
-0.3 (-0.5, 0)
0.02
-0.3 (-0.5, 0)
0.06
-0.1 (-0.2, 0)
0.14
Fatigue
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
-0.3 (-0.7, 0)
0.04
T2
-0.8 (-1.0, -0.5)
< 0.001
-0.2 (-0.4, 0)
0.13
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
< 0.001
T3
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.9)
< 0.001
-0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
< 0.001
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
< 0.001
Table 5 Subgroup analysis for gastrointestinal symptoms
Subgroup/measure
Intervention group
Control group
Between-group difference
Mean difference (95%CI)
P value
Mean difference (95%CI)
P value
Mean difference (95%CI)
P value
Abdominal distension
Gastric cancer (n = 28)
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
0 (-0.5, 0.5)
1.00
T2
-0.1 (-0.7, 0.5)
1.00
0.4 (0.1, 0.8)
0.01
-0.5 (-1.0, 0)
0.04
T3
-0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
0.02
0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
1.00
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
< 0.001
Colon cancer (n = 36)
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
-0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
0.17
T2
-0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
0.56
0.5 (0.1, 0.9)
0.003
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
< 0.001
T3
-0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
< 0.001
0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
1.00
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
< 0.001
Nausea
Gastric cancer (n = 28)
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
0.6 (0.1, 1.0)
0.01
T2
-0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
< 0.001
0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
0.71
-0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
0.009
T3
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.9)
< 0.001
-0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
0.32
-0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
0.01
Colon cancer (n = 36)
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
-0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
0.38
T2
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.5)
< 0.001
-0.4 (-0.7, 0)
0.04
-0.5 (-0.8, -0.2)
0.004
T3
-0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
< 0.001
-0.8 (-1.3, -0.2)
0.003
-0.3 (-0.5, -0.1)
0.007
Vomiting
Gastric cancer (n = 28)
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
0.2 (-0.3, 0.7)
0.43
T2
-0.3 (-0.7, 0)
0.04
0.1 (-0.2, 0.3)
1.00
-0.2 (-0.7, 0.2)
0.35
T3
-0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
0.02
-0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
0.71
-0.1 (-0.3, 0)
0.13
Colon cancer (n = 36)
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
-0.2 (-0.5, 0.2)
0.37
T2
-0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
0.067
-0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
0.10
-0.1 (-0.3, 0.1)
0.44
T3
-0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
0.11
-0.3 (-0.7, 0.1)
0.15
0 (0, 0)
1.00
Fatigue
Gastric cancer (n = 28)
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
-0.5 (-1.1, 0)
0.06
T2
-0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
0.07
-0.1 (-0.5, 0.2)
1.00
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
< 0.001
T3
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.5)
< 0.001
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
< 0.001
-0.5 (-0.9, -0.2)
0.003
Colon cancer (n = 36)
T1
Reference
N/A
Reference
N/A
-0.3 (-0.7, 0.2)
0.28
T2
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
< 0.001
-0.3 (-0.5, 0)
0.06
-0.9 (0.4, 1.4)
< 0.001
T3
-1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
< 0.001
-0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
< 0.001
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
< 0.001
Table 6 Parameter estimates of needle therapy effect on gastrointestinal symptoms
Measure
Parameters
B
95%CI lower
95%CI upper
P value
Abdominal distension
(group = 1) × (time = 3)
-0.8
-1.3
-0.4
< 0.001
(group = 1) × (time = 2)
-0.6
-1.0
-0.3
< 0.001
Nausea
(group = 1) × (time = 3)
-0.5
-0.9
-0.1
0.02
(group = 1) × (time = 2)
-0.7
-0.9
-0.4
0.001
Vomiting
(group = 1) × (time = 3)
0.1
-0.3
0.3
0.83
(group = 1) × (time = 2)
-0.1
-0.3
0.1
0.22
Fatigue
(group = 1) × (time = 3)
-0.4
-0.7
-0.2
0.003
(group = 1) × (time = 2)
-0.6
-0.9
-0.3
< 0.001
Citation: Guo M, Wang M, Chen LL, Wei FJ, Li JE, Lu QX, Zhang L, Yang HX. Effect of intradermal needle therapy at combined acupoints on patients’ gastrointestinal function following surgery for gastrointestinal tumors. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(31): 11427-11441