Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2022; 10(27): 9641-9649
Published online Sep 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i27.9641
Published online Sep 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i27.9641
Table 1 Comparison of annual group data of consumers in groups A and B, n (%)
Basic information | Group A (n = 40) | Group B (n = 38) | t/χ2 value | P value |
Age (yr) | 36.4 ± 8.5 | 38.4 ± 9.0 | -1.009 | 0.316 |
Height (cm) | 167.8 ± 4.6 | 167.2 ± 5.0 | 0.552 | 0.583 |
Weight (kg) | 65.1 ± 6.8 | 67.4 ± 7.2 | -1.451 | 0.151 |
Time from injury to surgery (d) | 7.4 ± 2.1 | 6.9 ± 1.7 | 1.152 | 0.253 |
Sex | 0.601 | 0.438 | ||
Male | 24 (60.00) | 26 (68.42) | ||
Female | 16 (40.00) | 12 (31.58) | ||
Affected side distribution | 1.990 | 0.158 | ||
Left side | 20 (50.00) | 25 (65.79) | ||
Right | 20 (50.00) | 13 (34.21) | ||
Meyers-McKeever type | 0.020 | 0.887 | ||
Type II | 29 (72.50) | 27 (71.05) | ||
Type III | 11 (27.50) | 11 (28.95) | ||
Tibia instability | 0.690 | 0.406 | ||
Stage II | 26 (65.00) | 28 (73.68) | ||
Stage III | 14 (35.00) | 10 (26.32) |
Table 2 Comparison of operation time and fracture healing time between group A and group B (mean ± SD)
Groups | n | Operation time (min) | Fracture healing time (wk) |
Group A | 40 | 108.5 ± 18.4 | 12.5 ± 1.4 |
Group B | 38 | 59.2 ± 11.7 | 12.8 ± 1.5 |
t value | 14.037 | -0.914 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.364 |
Table 3 Comparison of the functional range of motion of the knee joint in group A and group B (mean ± SD, °)
Table 4 Comparison of knee function scores between group A and group B (mean ± SD, scores)
Project | Preoperative | t value | P value | 6 months after surgery | t value | P value | ||
Group A (n = 40) | Group B (n = 38) | Group A (n = 40) | Group B (n = 38) | |||||
Limp | 1.88 ± 0.30 | 1.94 ± 0.45 | -0.696 | 0.488 | 3.92 ± 0.74a | 4.11 ± 0.80a | -1.090 | 0.279 |
Support | 1.90 ± 0.41 | 1.98 ± 0.48 | -0.793 | 0.430 | 4.13 ± 0.68a | 4.26 ± 0.88a | -0.732 | 0.466 |
Winch | 5.84 ± 1.20 | 6.12 ± 1.32 | -0.981 | 0.330 | 11.30 ± 2.57a | 10.93 ± 2.83a | 0.605 | 0.547 |
Unstable | 12.67 ± 2.48 | 11.88 ± 2.27 | 1.465 | 0.147 | 20.38 ± 3.70a | 21.03 ± 3.58a | -0.788 | 0.433 |
Swelling | 4.41 ± 0.86 | 4.67 ± 0.90 | -1.305 | 0.196 | 8.81 ± 0.89a | 8.48 ± 1.03a | 1.516 | 0.134 |
Go upstairs | 3.36 ± 0.78 | 3.62 ± 0.85 | -1.409 | 0.163 | 7.96 ± 1.14a | 8.21 ± 1.26a | -0.920 | 0.361 |
Squat | 1.67 ± 0.41 | 1.80 ± 0.48 | -1.288 | 0.202 | 3.88 ± 1.03a | 4.02 ± 0.89a | -0.641 | 0.524 |
Pain | 13.52 ± 2.96 | 12.81 ± 2.56 | 1.130 | 0.262 | 20.86 ± 3.02a | 21.32 ± 3.31a | -0.642 | 0.523 |
Total score | 45.25 ± 7.33 | 44.82 ± 6.81 | 0.268 | 0.789 | 81.24 ± 9.25a | 82.36 ± 8.90a | -0.544 | 0.588 |
Table 5 Comparison of surgical complications, n (%)
Groups | n | Incision infection | Loose internal fixation | Venous thrombosis of lower extremity | Complication rate |
Group A | 40 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 (2.63) |
Group B | 38 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 (18.42) |
χ2 value | 5.367 | ||||
P value | 0.021 |
- Citation: Niu HM, Wang QC, Sun RZ. Therapeutic effect of two methods on avulsion fracture of tibial insertion of anterior cruciate ligament. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(27): 9641-9649
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i27/9641.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i27.9641