Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2022; 10(26): 9323-9331
Published online Sep 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9323
Published online Sep 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9323
Table 1 Clinical information and anti-infective treatment
Date | Basic information about the patient | Antimicrobial treatment |
November 19, 2021 (C-section day) | ||
Postoperative D1 | The patient had a sudden fever in the afternoon and reported the highest temperature of 39.7 ℃ at 10:00 pm. Blood examinations indicated WBC was 15.97 × 109/L, NEUT was 84.7% and CRP was 93.96 mg/L | Cefoperazone-sulbactam (2:1) 3 g iv q12h |
Postoperative D2 | The temperature was 38.6 ℃ at 2:00 am and 38 ℃ at 6:00 pm. The abdominal incision of the patient was clean and dry, and the patient’s intestinal function had been restored | No changes in the treatment regimen |
Postoperative D3 | The temperature was normal and routine blood examination indicated that WBC was 10.38 × 109/L, NEUT was 71.3%, and CRP was 93.96 mg/L. Blood culture (first time) results suggested the possibility of gram-negative bacterial growth | Cefoperazone-sulbactam (2:1) 3 g iv q8h |
Postoperative D4 | A temperature of 37.6 ℃ was reported at 2:00 pm and was normal for the rest of the day | No changes in the treatment regimen |
Postoperative D6 | The temperature was 37.6 ℃ at 2:00 pm. Blood culture (first time) results suggested the growth of Gardnerella vaginalis (gram-negative bacteria) in anaerobic bottles (left and right). Blood examination indicated that WBC was 8.11 × 109/L, NEUT was 63.9%, and CRP was 77.88 mg/L | Cefoperazone-sulbactam (2:1) 3g iv q8h combined with ornidazole 0.5 g q12h |
Postoperative D9 | Temperature occasionally reached 37.7 ℃ and was normal for the rest of the day | No changes in the treatment regimen |
Postoperative D10 | The results of the blood culture (second time) showed no further bacterial growth | No changes in the treatment regimen |
Postoperative D12 | The temperature was normal, no discomfort, the uterus was well restored, and the patient’s blood tests were normal | No changes in the treatment regimen |
Postoperative D14 (discharge day) | The results of the blood culture (third time) showed that there was no bacterial growth, and the patient could be discharged | Antimicrobial treatment was stopped |
Table 2 Obstetric characteristics of patients with Gardnerella vaginalis bloodstream infection
Patients | Ref. | Age | Gestational weeks | Obstetric diagnosis | Infection-related perinatal factors | Mode of delivery |
1 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | 28 | 19+ | Missed abortion | Inflammation of uterine cavity | Spontaneous vaginal delivery |
2 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | 23 | 24+ | Fetal malformation | Drugs and balloons promoting cervical maturation | Forceps delivery |
3 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | 33 | 40+ | Obstetric diagnosis | Amniotomy | Intrapartum cesarean section |
4 | Lu et al[9], 2018 | 33 | 37+4 | Marginal placenta previa | Prenatal bleeding | Elective C-section |
5 | Chen et al[10], 2018 | 35 | Unknown | Fetal distress | Nothing | Elective C-section |
6 | Present case | 31 | 38+2 | Obstetric diagnosis | Pelvic adhesion | Elective C-section |
Table 3 Detection of Gardnerella vaginalis in blood
Patients | Ref | Blood sampling method | Blood culture results | Blood gram staining | Bacterial morphology | Inoculate on a culture plate | Mass spectrometry | PCR and sequencing |
1 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Bilateral double bottles | Aerobic bottle (+); Anaerobic bottle (+) | (-) | Small bacilli | Yes | Yes | No |
2 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Bilateral double bottles | Aerobic bottle (-); Anaerobic bottle (+) | (-) | Small bacilli | Yes | Yes | No |
3 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Bilateral double bottles | Aerobic bottle (-); Anaerobic bottle (+) | (-) | Small bacilli | Yes | Yes | No |
4 | Lu et al[9], 2018 | Bilateral double bottles | Aerobic bottle (-); Anaerobic bottle (+) | (-) | Small bacilli | Yes | Yes | No |
5 | Chen et al[10], 2018 | Bilateral double bottles | Aerobic bottle (-); Anaerobic bottle (+) | (-) | Cocci | Yes | No | Yes |
6 | Present case | Bilateral double bottles | Aerobic bottle (-); Anaerobic bottle (+) | (-) | Small bacilli | Yes | No | No |
Table 4 Initial symptoms and laboratory examination of bloodstream infections caused by Gardnerella vaginalis after parturition
Patients | Ref. | First symptoms | T (℃) | WBC (× 109/L) | NEUT (%) | CRP (mg/L) | PCT (μg/L) |
1 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Fever | 39.7 | 15.23 | 88.94 | 154.60 | 1.26 |
2 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Fever | 39.5 | 24.51 | 91.14 | 170.30 | 0.46 |
3 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Fever | 39.1 | 21.37 | 91.20 | 162.50 | 0.57 |
4 | Lu et al[9], 2018 | Fever | 39.2 | 11.90 | 87.30 | 114.00 | - |
5 | Chen et al[10], 2018 | Fever | 38.8 | 18.06 | 91.20 | - | 0.30 |
6 | Present case | Fever | 39.7 | 15.97 | 84.70 | 93.96 | - |
Table 5 Anti-microbial strategies for postpartum Gardnerella vaginalis bloodstream infections
Patients | Ref. | Initial treatment regimen | Adjusted treatment plan | Outcome |
1 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Ceftriaxone + ornidazole + levofloxacin | Same as before | Recovery |
2 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Penicillin + metronidazole | Same as before | Recovery |
3 | Fan et al[8], 2020 | Cefoperazone-sulbactam + metronidazole | Same as before | Recovery |
4 | Lu et al[9], 2018 | Ornidazole + ceftriaxone + imipenem-cilastatin | Cefoperazone-sulbactam + ornidazole | Recovery |
5 | Chen et al[10], 2018 | Cefuroxime | Same as before | Recovery |
6 | Present case | Cefoperazone-sulbactam | Cefoperazone-sulbactam + ornidazole | Recovery |
- Citation: Mu Y, Li JJ, Wu X, Zhou XF, Tang L, Zhou Q. Cefoperazone-sulbactam and ornidazole for Gardnerella vaginalis bloodstream infection after cesarean section: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(26): 9323-9331
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i26/9323.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9323