Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 16, 2022; 10(26): 9207-9218
Published online Sep 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9207
Published online Sep 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9207
Table 1 The most important features of electrocardiogram signals in the UCI dataset
Features | Values |
Age | Yr |
Sex | Male = 0, female = 1 |
Height | cm |
Weight | Kg |
QRS length | Average QRS length in milliseconds |
Distance P-R | Average time interval between the start of waves P and Q in milliseconds |
Distance Q-T | Average time interval between start of wave Q and end of wave T in milliseconds |
Distance T | Average time interval of wave T in milliseconds |
Distance P | Average P wave distance in milliseconds |
QRS | Degree vector angles on the screen |
T | Degree vector angles on the screen |
P | Degree vector angles on the screen |
QRST | Degree vector angles on the screen |
J | Degree vector angles on the screen |
Heart rate | Heart rate per minute |
Table 2 Cardiac arrhythmia classes in the UCI dataset
Class No. | Class name | Number of classes |
C1 | Normal | 245 |
C2 | Ischemic changes (coronary artery diseases) | 44 |
C3 | Old anterior myocardial infarction | 15 |
C4 | Old inferior myocardial infarction | 15 |
C5 | Sinus tachycardy | 13 |
C6 | Sinus bradycardy | 25 |
C7 | Ventricular premature contraction (pvc) | 3 |
C8 | Supraventricular premature contraction | 2 |
C9 | Left bundle branch block | 9 |
C10 | Right bundle branch block | 50 |
C11 | 1 Degree antrioventricular block | 0 |
C12 | 2 Degree AV block | 0 |
C13 | 3 Degree AV block | 0 |
C14 | Left ventricule hypertrophy | 4 |
C15 | Atrial fibrillation or flutter | 5 |
C16 | Others | 22 |
Table 3 The confusion matrix
True results | |||
Positive | Negative | ||
Test results | Positive | TP | FP |
Negative | FN | TN |
Table 4 Long short-term memory model training and test times with/without rough set theory feature selection
Time | LSTM | RST-LSTM | Time reduction |
Training | 217154 ms | 69247 ms | 68.11% |
Test | 23854 ms | 3856 ms | 83.83% |
Table 5 Positive prediction value of detection of the proposed system by cardiac arrhythmia classes
Class No. | LSTM | RST-LSTM | Class No. | LSTM | RST-LSTM |
C1 | 97.65 | 98.44 | C9 | NaN | NaN |
C2 | 89.54 | 90.23 | C10 | 98.49 | 99.83 |
C3 | 98.76 | 99.08 | C11 | NaN | NaN |
C4 | 99.14 | 99.12 | C12 | NaN | NaN |
C5 | 98.26 | 98.74 | C13 | NaN | NaN |
C6 | 94.29 | 96.63 | C14 | 98.16 | 98.94 |
C7 | NaN | NaN | C15 | NaN | NaN |
C8 | NaN | NaN | C16 | 87.63 | 89.90 |
Average PPV | LSTM | 95.76 | Average PPV | RST-LSTM | 96.77 |
Table 6 Negative prediction value of detection of the proposed system by cardiac arrhythmia classes
Class No. | LSTM | RST-LSTM | Class No. | LSTM | RST-LSTM |
C1 | 96.74 | 98.14 | C9 | NaN | NaN |
C2 | 84.27 | 86.45 | C10 | 97.45 | 98.32 |
C3 | 98.79 | 99.16 | C11 | NaN | NaN |
C4 | 97.56 | 98.87 | C12 | NaN | NaN |
C5 | 98.23 | 98.12 | C13 | NaN | NaN |
C6 | 90.29 | 92.64 | C14 | 98.34 | 99.05 |
C7 | NaN | NaN | C15 | NaN | NaN |
C8 | NaN | NaN | C16 | 83.11 | 85.36 |
Average NPV | LSTM | 93.86 | Average NPV | RST-LSTM | 95.12 |
Table 7 Sensitivity of detection of the proposed system by cardiac arrhythmia classes
Class No. | LSTM | RST-LSTM | Class No. | LSTM | RST-LSTM |
C1 | 98.54 | 99.16 | C9 | NaN | NaN |
C2 | 86.73 | 88.57 | C10 | 98.24 | 98.65 |
C3 | 99.54 | 99.52 | C11 | NaN | NaN |
C4 | 97.98 | 98.86 | C12 | NaN | NaN |
C5 | 98.36 | 98.87 | C13 | NaN | NaN |
C6 | 89.56 | 92.19 | C14 | 97.92 | 99.03 |
C7 | NaN | NaN | C15 | NaN | NaN |
C8 | NaN | NaN | C16 | 81.57 | 82.87 |
Average sensitivity | LSTM | 94.27 | Average sensitivity | RST-LSTM | 95.30 |
- Citation: Dami S. Internet of things-based health monitoring system for early detection of cardiovascular events during COVID-19 pandemic. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(26): 9207-9218
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i26/9207.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i26.9207