Shi S, Gan L, Jin CN, Liu RF. Effects of propofol combined with lidocaine on hemodynamics, serum adrenocorticotropic hormone, interleukin-6, and cortisol in children. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(24): 8506-8513 [PMID: 36157832 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8506]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Rong-Fang Liu, MD, Attending Doctor, Department of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, No. 212 Yuhua East Road, Baoding 071000, Hebei Province, China. liurf2021@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Anesthesiology
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2022; 10(24): 8506-8513 Published online Aug 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i24.8506
Table 1 Comparison of hemodynamic indexes of two groups of children (mean ± SD)
Groups
T0
T1
T2
T3
HR (times/min)
A group
113.6 ± 8.2
120.5 ± 8.0
118.9 ± 7.5
115.5 ± 8.4
B group
115.0 ± 9.0
126.1 ± 7.4
125.0 ± 8.3
116.8 ± 8.0
F value
F1 = 13.025, F2 = 15.776, F3 = 8.169
P value
P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000, P3 = 0.000
MAP (mmHg)
A group
85.2 ± 6.9
92.7 ± 5.5
92.0 ± 5.9
87.0 ± 5.3
B group
84.8 ± 6.5
96.0 ± 6.2
95.1 ± 6.8
89.1 ± 6.5
F value
F1 = 9.881, F2 = 13.764, F3 = 6.990
P value
P1 = 0.000, P2 = 0.000, P3 = 0.000
SpO2 (%)
A group
98.2 ± 0.6
97.7 ± 0.7
97.8 ± 0.6
98.0 ± 0.5
B group
98.3 ± 0.7
97.6 ± 0.6
97.9 ± 0.8
97.8 ± 0.7
F value
F1 = 2.514, F2 = 6.395, F3 = 1.552
P value
P1 = 0.168, P2 = 0.000, P3 = 0.351
Table 2 Comparison of serum adrenocorticotropic hormone, interleukin-6, and cortisol levels in two groups of children (mean ± SD)
Groups
ACTH (ng/L)
IL-6 (ng/L)
Cor (nmol/L)
Preoperative
12 h after operation
Preoperative
12 h after operation
Preoperative
12 h after operation
A group (n = 60)
116.3 ± 15.7
130.2 ± 18.2
5.77 ± 2.01
12.41 ± 4.29
24.18 ± 4.26
36.80 ± 6.90
B group (n = 60)
114.7 ± 13.5
145.0 ± 22.1
6.03 ± 2.28
18.15 ± 5.88
25.04 ± 5.51
53.36 ± 8.15
t value
0.599
-4.004
-0.663
-6.109
-0.956
-12.012
P value
0.551
0.000
0.509
0.000
0.341
0.000
Table 3 Comparison of the occurrence of restlessness in the two groups of children during the waking period
Groups
PAED score (points)
Incidence of restlessness, n (%)
A group (n = 60)
6.2 ± 2.5
14 (23.33)
B group (n = 60)
8.1 ± 2.9
22 (36.67)
t/χ2 value
-3.844
4.104
P value
0.000
0.043
Table 4 Comparison of extubation time, awake time, and out-of-room time between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups
Pull-out time (min)
Wake time (min)
Off room time (min)
A group (n = 60)
7.66 ± 1.84
10.59 ± 2.30
22.63 ± 3.81
B group (n = 60)
8.01 ± 1.92
11.36 ± 2.45
23.70 ± 3.54
t value
-1.019
-1.775
-1.594
P value
0.310
0.078
0.114
Table 5 Comparison of postoperative visual analog scale scores between two groups of children (mean ± SD)
Groups
2 h after operation
8 h after operation
12 h after operation
24 h after operation
A group (n = 60)
2.77 ± 0.64
3.38 ± 0.61
3.41 ± 0.74
2.18 ± 0.50
B group (n = 60)
3.10 ± 0.61
3.76 ± 0.74
3.60 ± 0.82
2.34 ± 0.58
t value
-2.891
-3.069
-1.332
-1.618
P value
0.005
0.003
0.185
0.108
Table 6 Comparison of the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Feel sick and vomit
Tongue drop
Lethargy
Adverse reactions
A group (n = 60)
3
1
1
5 (6.25)
B group (n = 60)
7
3
3
13 (16.25)
χ2 value
4.183
P value
0.041
Citation: Shi S, Gan L, Jin CN, Liu RF. Effects of propofol combined with lidocaine on hemodynamics, serum adrenocorticotropic hormone, interleukin-6, and cortisol in children. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(24): 8506-8513