Qie XJ, Liu ZH, Guo LM. Evaluation of progressive early rehabilitation training mode in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(23): 8152-8160 [PMID: 36159546 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8152]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Li-Min Guo, BSc, Chief Nurse, Department of Cardiology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, No. 12 Jiankang Road, Chang'an District, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China. gweid66@sina.com
Research Domain of This Article
Nursing
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2022; 10(23): 8152-8160 Published online Aug 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8152
Table 1 Comparison of patients’ general data in interventional and control groups
Feature
Interventional group (n = 95)
Control group (n = 95)
P value
Age (mean ± SD)
52.52 ± 3.04
53.78 ± 2.85
0.5214
Sex, n (%)
Male
52 (54.74)
58 (61.05)
0.8541
Female
43 (45.26)
37 (38.95)
Disease type, n (%)
0.4574
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
27 (28.42)
24 (25.26)
Pneumonia
15 (15.79%)
17 (17.89)
Severe bronchial asthma
22 (23.16)
19 (20.00)
Else
31 (32.63)
35 (36.84)
APACHE II score (mean ± SD)
17.52 ± 2.54
17.78 ± 2.23
0.078
Table 2 Comparison of delirium occurrence, mechanical ventilation time, and intensive care unit hospitalization time between intervention and control groups
Group
Incidence of delirium, n (%)
Delirium duration (d)
Duration of mechanical ventilation (d)
ICU hospitalization time (d)
Interventional group (n = 95)
27 (28.00)
2.62 ± 0.43
5.74 ± 1.75
10.52 ± 2.28
Control group (n = 95)
50 (52.00)
4.59 ± 0.82
8.43 ± 2.36
15.74 ± 4.24
t/χ2
15.648
8.542
5.537
9.182
P value
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of functional scores of functional independence measure scale between intervention and control groups
Group
Social cognition
Communication
Self-care ability
Transfer
Sphincter control
Deambulation
Interventional group (n = 95)
17.48 ± 1.42
13.23 ± 1.47
30.36 ± 3.23
12.53 ± 1.41
7.54 ± 1.04
90.14 ± 9.35
Control group (n = 95)
16.04 ± 1.36
11.54 ± 1.36
25.78 ± 3.54
9.65 ± 1.14
5.53 ± 0.87
77.53 ± 8.64
t value
5.678
4.785
6.423
8.745
9.742
6.451
P value
< 0.001
0.002
< 0.001
< 0.001
0.001
< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of Barthel index before and after intervention
Citation: Qie XJ, Liu ZH, Guo LM. Evaluation of progressive early rehabilitation training mode in intensive care unit patients with mechanical ventilation. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(23): 8152-8160