BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 16, 2022; 10(23): 8076-8087
Published online Aug 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8076
Table 1 Potential effects of coronavirus disease 2019 on gut and lung microbiome
Gut microbiome
Lung microbiome
Changes in the diversity of the intestinal microbiota have been found: (1) Decrease in the relative abundance of beneficial microbes (such as Agathobacter, Fusicatenibacter, Roseburia and Ruminococcaceae UCG−013); and (2) Oredominance of opportunistic genera (such as Actinomyces, Rothia, Streptococcus) and Veillonella[24]Changes in the diversity of the lung microbiota have been found: (1) Prevalence of Acinetobacter, Brevundimonas, Burkholderia, Chryseobacterium, Sphingobium species and Enterobacteriaceae members; and (2) Among mycetes, prevalence of Cryptococcus, followed by Aspergillus, Alternaria, Dipodascus, Mortierella, Naganishia, Diutina, Candida, Cladosporium, Issatchenkia, and Wallemia[29]
COVID-19 severity: (1) Was positively associated to the relative abundance of Coprobacillus, Clostridium ramosum, and Clostridium hathewayi; and (2) Was inversely associated to the abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii (which favors an anti-inflammatory microenvironment)[25]The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of COVID-19 patients characterized by relative abundance of: (1) Lactic acid bacteria such as Lactobacillus fermentum, Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus delbrueckii, and Lactobacillus salivarius; (2) Some pathogens such as Klebsiella oxytoca, Enterobacter cloacae (positively correlated with COVID-19 severity), and Bacillus cereus; (3) Some nosocomial infection pathogens such as Enterobacter kobei, Enterobacter cloacae, and Ralstonia pickettii; and (4) Several gut bacteria like Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Enterococcus faecium, and Citrobacter freundii, and commensal bacteria residing in the mouth and respiratory tracts such as Rothia mucilaginosa[30]
Viral load in feces of COVID-19 patients inversely correlated to the relative abundance of Bacteroides dorei, B. massiliensis, B. ovatus, and B. thetaiotaomicron (that downregulate the ACE-2 expression in mouse intestine)[25]Bacterial and fungal DNA burden in BAL specimens of patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS significantly higher than in negative experimental controls, with relative abundance of Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus spp[31]
SARS-CoV-2 infectivity: (1) Was positively related to relative abundance of Collinsella aerofaciens, C. tanakaei, Morganella morganii, and Streptococcus infantis; and (2) Was inversely related to prevalence of Alistipes onderdonkii, Bacteroides stercoris, Lachnospiraceae bacterium and Parabacteroides merdae[26]
Increased abundance of opportunistic fungi (including Candida albicans, C. auris, Aspergillus flavus and A. niger) in feces of COVID-19 patients was found when compared to controls[27]
In patients with MIS-C a predominance of Eubacterium dolichum, Eggerthella lenta, Bacillus thermoamylovorans, Prevotella tannerae, and Bacteroides coprophilus and a decrease of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii were reported. In COVID-19 group an increase of Bifidobacterium adolescents and Dorea formicigenerasus was found[28]
Table 2 Main findings of the pediatric studies on the association between gut microbiota and coronavirus disease 2019
Ref.
Study design and methods
Population (n)
Main findings
Romano-Keeler et al[44]Observational cohort studyTwenty-one COVID-19 positive mothers delivering between March and August 2020 with a mean age of 26 (17-42) yrDelayed cord clamping and skin-to-skin avoided; infants admitted to the NICU with maternal breast milk restricted. Discharge arranged with COVID-19 negative family members. All 21 infants COVID-19 negative at 24 and 48 h. Changes in perinatal care might negatively affect gut microbiome pattern early in life
Nashed et al[40]Case-control study595 children aged 0-24 moSignificantly different abundant species between SARS-CoV-2 positive infants and controls were found. A decreased abundance of Bifidobacterium bifidum and Akkermansia muciniphila in positive samples (both linked to protection against inflammation) was found
Xu et al[43]Case-control study(1) 9 children diagnosed with COVID-19 aged 7-139 mo; and (2) 14 age-matched healthy control childrenAltered microbiome in COVID-19 children, with increased abundance of opportunistic pathogenic and environmental bacteria such as Pseudomonas, Herbaspirillum, and Burkholderia both in the upper respiratory tract and the gut was found. Dysbiosis up to 25-28 d in different subjects was reported
Table 3 Main findings of the studies on the association between infant gut microbiota and coronavirus disease 2019
Ref.
Study design and methods
Population (n)
Main findings
Romano-Keeler et al[44]Observational cohort studyTwenty-one COVID-19 positive mothers delivering between March and August 2020 with a mean age of 26 (17-42) yrDelayed cord clamping and skin-to-skin avoided; infants admitted to the NICU with maternal breast milk restricted. Discharge arranged with COVID-19 negative family members. All infants COVID-19 negative at 24 and 48 h. Changes in perinatal care might negatively affect gut microbiome pattern early in life
Salvatori et al[57]Case reportTwo maternal–infant dyads with a positive nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 both in the mother and in the childSARS-CoV-2 was not detected by RT-PCR in breast milk samples of both mothers
Gómez-Torres et al[68]Prospective case-control study(1) 37 women with full-term pregnancies and mild SARS-CoV-2 infection; and (2) 63 healthy controlsNo difference nor in Alpha-neither in Beta-diversity between breast milk samples collected from the two groups; Staphylococcus and Streptococcus were the most abundant genera and the only ones detected in all the samples. Disease state (symptomatic or asymptomatic infection) did not affect the metataxonomic profile


Write to the Help Desk