Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2022; 10(17): 5634-5645
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5634
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5634
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with incidental focal hypermetabolism in the colon and/or rectum (n = 80)
Nature of incidental focal hypermetabolism | Characteristics | Men | Women | Total, % |
Malignant | Subjects (n) | 16 | 8 | 24 |
(lesions, n = 24) | Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 70.1 ± 11.5 | 72.5 ± 14.1 | 71 ± 12.1 |
Primary malignancy (n) | ||||
Lung | 5 | 0 | 5 (20.8) | |
Stomach | 5 | 0 | 5 (20.8) | |
Breast | 0 | 3 | 3 (12.5) | |
Prostate | 1 | 0 | 1 (4.2) | |
Lymphoma | 0 | 1 | 1 (4.2) | |
Hepatobiliary | 2 | 1 | 3 (12.5) | |
Other | 3 | 3 | 6 (25.0) | |
Premalignant | Subjects (n) | 20 | 6 | 26 |
(lesions, n = 27) | Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 67.9 ± 6.4 | 68.8 ± 18.7 | 68.1 ± 10.1 |
Primary malignancy (n) | ||||
Lung | 10 | 1 | 11 (42.3) | |
Stomach | 4 | 1 | 5 (19.2) | |
Breast | 0 | 0 | 0 (0.0) | |
Prostate | 2 | 0 | 2 (7.7) | |
Lymphoma | 1 | 1 | 2 (7.7) | |
Hepatobiliary | 2 | 2 | 4 (15.4) | |
Other | 1 | 1 | 2 (7.7) | |
Malignant/ | Subjects (n) | 36 | 14 | 50 |
Premalignant | Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 68.9 ± 8.94 | 70.9 ± 15.7 | 69.4 ± 11.1 |
(lesions, n = 51) | Primary malignancy (n) | |||
Lung | 15 | 1 | 16 (32.0) | |
Stomach | 9 | 1 | 10 (20.0) | |
Breast | 0 | 3 | 3 (6.0) | |
Prostate | 3 | 0 | 3 (6.0) | |
Lymphoma | 1 | 2 | 3 (6.0) | |
Hepatobiliary | 4 | 3 | 7 (14.0) | |
Other | 4 | 4 | 8 (16.0) | |
Benign | Subjects (n) | 9 | 21 | 30 |
(lesions, n = 32) | Age (yr, mean ± SD) | 58.9 ± 13.9 | 58.9 ± 13.3 | 58.9 ± 13.3 |
Primary malignancy (n) | ||||
Lung | 3 | 2 | 5 (16.7) | |
Stomach | 3 | 5 | 8 (26.7) | |
Breast | 0 | 4 | 4 (13.3) | |
Prostate | 1 | 0 | 1 (3.3) | |
Lymphoma | 0 | 1 | 1 (3.3) | |
Hepatobiliary | 2 | 2 | 4 (13.3) | |
Other | 0 | 7 | 7 (23.3) |
Table 2 Comparisons of positron emission tomography parameters among malignant, premalignant, malignant/premalignant, and benign lesions
Malignant (n = 24) | Premalignant (n = 27) | P value | |
mean SUVmax ± SD | 12.8 ± 7.6 | 10.5 ± 4.7 | > 0.05 |
mean SUVpeak ± SD | 9.7 ± 6.1 | 7.9 ± 4.0 | > 0.05 |
Malignant (n=24) | Benign (n=32) | P value | |
mean SUVmax ± SD | 12.8 ± 7.6 | 7.2 ± 3.4 | < 0.05 |
mean SUVpeak ± SD | 9.7 ± 6.1 | 5.6 ± 2.7 | < 0.05 |
mean mSUVmtv3.5 ± SD | 6.1 ± 1.8 | 4.7 ± 0.8 | < 0.05 |
Premalignant (n=27) | Benign (n=32) | P value | |
mean SUVmax ± SD | 10.5 ± 4.7 | 7.2 ± 3.4 | < 0.05 |
mean SUVpeak ± SD | 7.9 ± 4.0 | 5.6 ± 2.7 | < 0.05 |
mean mSUVmtv4.5 ± SD | 6.5 ± 1.5 | 5.5 ± 0.9 | < 0.05 |
Malignant/premalignant (n = 51) | Benign (n = 32) | P value | |
mean SUVmax ± SD | 11.6 ± 6.3 | 7.2 ± 3.4 | < 0.05 |
mean SUVpeak ± SD | 8.8 ± 5.1 | 5.6 ± 2.7 | < 0.05 |
mean mSUVmtv3.5 ± SD | 5.9 ± 1.6 | 4.7 ± 0.8 | < 0.05 |
Table 3 Area under the curve and cut-off values of positron emission tomography parameters distinguishing malignant or/and premalignant from benign lesions
Parameter | AUC | Cut-off | Confidence interval | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
Malignant | SUVmax | 0.784 | 7.6 | 0.659 - 0.909 | 0.708 | 0.688 |
SUVpeak | 0.767 | 5.9 | 0.640 - 0.894 | 0.708 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv5 | 0.773 | 6.0 | 0.632 - 0.914 | 0.696 | 0.680 | |
mSUVmtv4.5 | 0.778 | 5.6 | 0.647 - 0.909 | 0.667 | 0.667 | |
mSUVmtv4 | 0.784 | 5.3 | 0.657 - 0.911 | 0.667 | 0.677 | |
mSUVmtv3.5 | 0.792 | 4.9 | 0.671 - 0.914 | 0.667 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv3 | 0.786 | 4.5 | 0.664 - 0.909 | 0.667 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv2.5 | 0.775 | 4.1 | 0.649 - 0.902 | 0.625 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv2 | 0.722 | 3.8 | 0.588 - 0.856 | 0.625 | 0.625 | |
Premalignant | SUVmax | 0.758 | 7.5 | 0.634 - 0.882 | 0.704 | 0.688 |
SUVpeak | 0.719 | 6.0 | 0.586 - 0.853 | 0.667 | 0.366 | |
mSUVmtv5 | 0.694 | 6.0 | 0.547 - 0.841 | 0.667 | 0.680 | |
mSUVmtv4.5 | 0.747 | 5.6 | 0.617 - 0.877 | 0.667 | 0.667 | |
mSUVmtv4 | 0.741 | 5.3 | 0.612 - 0.870 | 0.667 | 0.677 | |
mSUVmtv3.5 | 0.736 | 4.9 | 0.609 - 0.864 | 0.667 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv3 | 0.722 | 4.5 | 0.591 - 0.852 | 0.667 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv2.5 | 0.718 | 4.1 | 0.588 - 0.848 | 0.667 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv2 | 0.668 | 3.7 | 0.531 - 0.806 | 0.593 | 0.594 | |
Malignant/ | SUVmax | 0.770 | 7.6 | 0.668 - 0.872 | 0.686 | 0.688 |
Premalignant | SUVpeak | 0.742 | 6.0 | 0.635 - 0.848 | 0.647 | 0.656 |
mSUVmtv5 | 0.730 | 6.0 | 0.613 - 0.847 | 0.680 | 0.680 | |
mSUVmtv4.5 | 0.761 | 5.6 | 0.656 - 0.867 | 0.667 | 0.667 | |
mSUVmtv4 | 0.761 | 5.2 | 0.656 - 0.866 | 0.686 | 0.677 | |
mSUVmtv3.5 | 0.763 | 4.9 | 0.658 - 0.867 | 0.667 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv3 | 0.752 | 4.5 | 0.645 - 0.859 | 0.667 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv2.5 | 0.745 | 4.1 | 0.636 - 0.854 | 0.647 | 0.656 | |
mSUVmtv2 | 0.694 | 3.7 | 0.577 - 0.810 | 0.588 | 0.594 |
- Citation: Lee H, Hwang KH, Kwon KA. Assessment of incidental focal colorectal uptake by analysis of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography parameters. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(17): 5634-5645
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i17/5634.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5634