Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2022; 10(17): 5586-5594
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5586
Table 1 Comparison of diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters between the lesion and control areas (mean ± SD)
Indexes
The lesion area (n = 84)
The control area (n = 84)
t value
P value
ADC576.3 ± 94.2756.0 ± 102.1-11.8560.000
MD0.651 ± 0.1500.847 ± 0.167-8.0030.000
AD0.830 ± 0.1671.305 ± 0.204-16.5130.000
RD0.531 ± 0.0930.644 ± 0.122-6.7510.000
AK1.281 ± 0.2240.760 ± 0.11518.9640.000
MK1.256 ± 0.2410.922 ± 0.2079.6360.000
RK1.328 ± 0.3040.987 ± 0.1858.7820.000
Table 2 Comparison of cerebral blood flow values between the lesion area and control area under different parameters of different delay time after labeling (mean ± SD, mL/100 g/min)
Groups
n
PLD1.5s
PLD2.5s
Focal area8422.64 ± 5.8114.03 ± 3.91
Control area8434.51 ± 7.0337.58 ± 7.76
t value-11.929 -24.839
P value0.000 0.000
Table 3 Comparison of parameters of different delay time after labeling 1.5s perfusion parameters of average kurtosis/average diffusion coefficient-matched and unmatched infarct lesions (mean ± SD, mL/100 g/min)
Lesion area
MK/MD unmatched (n = 48)
MK/MD matched (n = 36)
t value
P value
Central are16.33 ± 4.7517.50 ± 4.82-1.1100.270
Peripheral area26.95 ± 5.30a,d28.03 ± 5.47a,d-0.9120.365
Unmatched area25.73 ± 5.54a,d-
Matched area34.60 ± 6.95d34.12 ± 6.85d0.3150.753
F value29.06428.551
P value0.0000.000
Table 4 Comparison of parameters of different delay time after labeling 2.5s perfusion parameters of average kurtosis/average diffusion coefficient-matched and unmatched infarct lesions (mean ± SD, mL/100 g/min)
Lesion area
MK/MD unmatched (n = 48)
MK/MD matched (n = 36)
t value
P value
Central area11.50 ± 3.8912.28 ± 4.03-0.8960.373
Peripheral area25.84 ± 6.03a,d26.71 ± 5.94a,d-0.6590.512
Unmatched area21.76 ± 5.20a,d-
Control area37.85 ± 7.5438.90 ± 7.41d-0.6360.526
F value41.02543.008
P value0.0000.000