Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2022; 10(17): 5577-5585
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577
Table 1 Comparison of general data of patients between the two groups, n (%)
Group
Sex
Age (yr)
Acute physiological and chronic health score (score)
Sequential organ failure score (score)
Number of basic illnesses
Female
Male
1 type
2 type
3 type
4 type
5 type
6 type
Conventional treatment group (n = 55)15 (27.27)40 (72.73)53.82 ± 16.0827.71 ± 4.5511.76 ± 3.155 (9.09)11 (20.00)17 (30.91)14 (25.45)5 (9.09)3 (5.45)
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47)14 (29.79)33 (70.21)53.15 ± 14.1628.28 ± 4.4910.57 ± 3.015 (10.64)14 (29.79)19 (40.43)4 (8.5)4 (8.51)1 (2.13)
χ2 /t value0.0790.2220.6341.9416.551
P value0.7790.8250.5270.0550.256
Table 2 Differences in respiratory mechanics indices of patients in each group before and after ventilation
Group
Oxygenation index
Cst (mL/cmH2O)
Pplat (cmH2O)
Day 1
Day 2
Day 4
Day 7
Day 1
Day 2
Day 4
Day 7
Day 1
Day 2
Day 4
Day 7
Routine treatment group (n = 55)85.31 ± 25.69198.33 ± 42.81254.86 ± 49.56308.03 ± 57.4724.09 ± 2.8736.06 ± 3.6236.38 ± 3.7536.45 ± 3.8225.32 ± 1.0621.96 ± 0.7921.80 ± 0.7221.73 ± 0.65
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47)129.34 ± 40.02205.23 ± 41.81255.50 ± 54.54320.81 ± 66.1529.80 ± 3.5236.24 ± 3.6536.42 ± 3.7236.55 ± 3.9022.01 ± 0.8221.90 ± 0.7521.76 ± 0.6821.70 ± 0.61
t value6.7040.8200.0621.0449.0240.2490.0540.13117.4100.3910.2870.239
P value0.0010.4140.9510.2990.0010.8040.9570.8960.0010.6960.7750.812
Table 3 Differences in hemodynamic indices of patients in each group on the first day after ventilation
Group
HR (time/min)
MAP (mmHg)
CVP (cmH2O)
LVEF (%)
Conventional treatment group (n = 55)95.60 ± 10.3189.11 ± 5.678.87 ± 1.9244.32 ± 1.35
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47)97.82 ± 12.5190.50 ± 5.729.17 ± 2.3244.30 ± 1.30
t value0.9831.2290.7150.076
P value0.3280.2220.4770.940
Table 4 Differences in mechanical ventilation time and intensive care unit stay in patients in each group (d)
Group
Mechanical ventilation time
ICU hospitalization
Conventional treatment group (n = 55)24.38 ± 7.9530.02 ± 9.75
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47)23.88 ± 7.0228.45 ± 8.23
t value0.3340.870
P value0.7390.386
Table 5 Differences in inflammatory factors (ug/L) in patients of each group before and after ventilation
Group
CRP (mg/L)
PCT (ug/L)
IL-6 (ug/L)
Conventional treatment group (n = 55)12.92 ± 1.0620.85 ± 2.2176.29 ± 3.75
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47)12.80 ± 1.0120.80 ± 2.2576.25 ± 2.26
t value0.5820.1130.064
P value0.5620.9100.949
Table 6 Difference in death rate on day 28 and day 90 for patients in each group, n (%)
Group
Day 28 mortality
Day 90 mortality
Conventional treatment group (n = 55)16 (29.09)25 (45.45)
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47)6 (12.77)12 (25.53)
χ2 value3.9934.352
P value0.0460.037