Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 16, 2022; 10(17): 5577-5585
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577
Published online Jun 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577
Table 1 Comparison of general data of patients between the two groups, n (%)
Group | Sex | Age (yr) | Acute physiological and chronic health score (score) | Sequential organ failure score (score) | Number of basic illnesses | ||||||
Female | Male | 1 type | 2 type | 3 type | 4 type | 5 type | 6 type | ||||
Conventional treatment group (n = 55) | 15 (27.27) | 40 (72.73) | 53.82 ± 16.08 | 27.71 ± 4.55 | 11.76 ± 3.15 | 5 (9.09) | 11 (20.00) | 17 (30.91) | 14 (25.45) | 5 (9.09) | 3 (5.45) |
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47) | 14 (29.79) | 33 (70.21) | 53.15 ± 14.16 | 28.28 ± 4.49 | 10.57 ± 3.01 | 5 (10.64) | 14 (29.79) | 19 (40.43) | 4 (8.5) | 4 (8.51) | 1 (2.13) |
χ2 /t value | 0.079 | 0.222 | 0.634 | 1.941 | 6.551 | ||||||
P value | 0.779 | 0.825 | 0.527 | 0.055 | 0.256 |
Table 2 Differences in respiratory mechanics indices of patients in each group before and after ventilation
Group | Oxygenation index | Cst (mL/cmH2O) | Pplat (cmH2O) | |||||||||
Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 7 | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 7 | Day 1 | Day 2 | Day 4 | Day 7 | |
Routine treatment group (n = 55) | 85.31 ± 25.69 | 198.33 ± 42.81 | 254.86 ± 49.56 | 308.03 ± 57.47 | 24.09 ± 2.87 | 36.06 ± 3.62 | 36.38 ± 3.75 | 36.45 ± 3.82 | 25.32 ± 1.06 | 21.96 ± 0.79 | 21.80 ± 0.72 | 21.73 ± 0.65 |
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47) | 129.34 ± 40.02 | 205.23 ± 41.81 | 255.50 ± 54.54 | 320.81 ± 66.15 | 29.80 ± 3.52 | 36.24 ± 3.65 | 36.42 ± 3.72 | 36.55 ± 3.90 | 22.01 ± 0.82 | 21.90 ± 0.75 | 21.76 ± 0.68 | 21.70 ± 0.61 |
t value | 6.704 | 0.820 | 0.062 | 1.044 | 9.024 | 0.249 | 0.054 | 0.131 | 17.410 | 0.391 | 0.287 | 0.239 |
P value | 0.001 | 0.414 | 0.951 | 0.299 | 0.001 | 0.804 | 0.957 | 0.896 | 0.001 | 0.696 | 0.775 | 0.812 |
Table 3 Differences in hemodynamic indices of patients in each group on the first day after ventilation
Group | HR (time/min) | MAP (mmHg) | CVP (cmH2O) | LVEF (%) |
Conventional treatment group (n = 55) | 95.60 ± 10.31 | 89.11 ± 5.67 | 8.87 ± 1.92 | 44.32 ± 1.35 |
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47) | 97.82 ± 12.51 | 90.50 ± 5.72 | 9.17 ± 2.32 | 44.30 ± 1.30 |
t value | 0.983 | 1.229 | 0.715 | 0.076 |
P value | 0.328 | 0.222 | 0.477 | 0.940 |
Table 4 Differences in mechanical ventilation time and intensive care unit stay in patients in each group (d)
Group | Mechanical ventilation time | ICU hospitalization |
Conventional treatment group (n = 55) | 24.38 ± 7.95 | 30.02 ± 9.75 |
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47) | 23.88 ± 7.02 | 28.45 ± 8.23 |
t value | 0.334 | 0.870 |
P value | 0.739 | 0.386 |
Table 5 Differences in inflammatory factors (ug/L) in patients of each group before and after ventilation
Group | CRP (mg/L) | PCT (ug/L) | IL-6 (ug/L) |
Conventional treatment group (n = 55) | 12.92 ± 1.06 | 20.85 ± 2.21 | 76.29 ± 3.75 |
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47) | 12.80 ± 1.01 | 20.80 ± 2.25 | 76.25 ± 2.26 |
t value | 0.582 | 0.113 | 0.064 |
P value | 0.562 | 0.910 | 0.949 |
Table 6 Difference in death rate on day 28 and day 90 for patients in each group, n (%)
Group | Day 28 mortality | Day 90 mortality |
Conventional treatment group (n = 55) | 16 (29.09) | 25 (45.45) |
Prone position ventilation treatment group (n = 47) | 6 (12.77) | 12 (25.53) |
χ2 value | 3.993 | 4.352 |
P value | 0.046 | 0.037 |
- Citation: Xia WH, Yang CL, Chen Z, Ouyang CH, Ouyang GQ, Li QG. Clinical evaluation of prone position ventilation in the treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by sepsis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(17): 5577-5585
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i17/5577.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5577