Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2022; 10(15): 4810-4817
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4810
Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4810
Table 1 The comparison of operation conditions between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups | Cases | Extracorporeal circulation time (min) | Aortic occlusion time (min) | Endotracheal intubation time (h) | Hospital stay (d) |
Study group | 41 | 109.35 ± 50.31 | 94.26 ± 59.61 | 12.59 ± 3.54 | 5.29 ± 2.34 |
Control group | 41 | 114.91 ± 46.98 | 101.37 ± 61.44 | 13.11 ± 4.01 | 7.09 ± 3.11 |
t value | 0.517 | 0.532 | 0.622 | 2.961 | |
P value | 0.606 | 0.596 | 0.535 | 0.004 |
Table 2 Comparison of inflammatory reaction related indices between the two groups before and after the operation (mean ± SD)
Groups | Cases | CRP (mg/L) | WBC (× 109/L) |
Before the operation | |||
Study group | 41 | 4.69 ± 1.35 | 6.21 ± 1.97 |
Control group | 41 | 5.01 ± 1.18 | 5.98 ± 2.01 |
t value | 1.143 | 0.523 | |
P value | 0.257 | 0.602 | |
After the operation | |||
Study group | 41 | 7.89 ± 1.73 | 10.76 ± 2.35 |
Control group | 41 | 9.96 ± 2.04 | 14.84 ± 3.07 |
t value | 4.955 | 6.757 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Table 3 Comparison of myocardial injury related indices between the two groups before and after the operation (mean ± SD)
Groups | Cases | cTnT (ng/mL) | CK-MB (mg/mL) | CK (U/L) | LDH (U/L) |
Before the operation | |||||
Study group | 41 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 4.02 ± 1.11 | 91.35 ± 10.44 | 179.81 ± 60.04 |
Control group | 41 | 0.05 ± 0.03 | 3.97 ± 1.05 | 89.69 ± 13.05 | 186.35 ± 56.96 |
t value | 1.776 | 0.210 | 0.637 | 0.506 | |
P value | 0.080 | 0.835 | 0.526 | 0.614 | |
After the operation | |||||
Study group | 41 | 0.89 ± 0.32 | 26.96 ± 4.95 | 608.32 ± 202.33 | 282.56 ± 101.34 |
Control group | 41 | 2.61 ± 0.69 | 34.37 ± 6.87 | 689.94 ± 214.64 | 369.15 ± 114.46 |
t value | 14.480 | 5.603 | 1.772 | 3.627 | |
P value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.080 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of the incidence of adverse events between the two groups, n (%)
Groups | Cases | Arrhythmia | Infection | Low cardiac output syndrome | Pleural effusion | Total incidence |
Study group | 41 | 1 (2.44) | 0 (0.00) | 1 (2.44) | 0 (0.00) | 2 (4.88) |
Control group | 41 | 2 (4.88) | 1 (2.44) | 2 (4.88) | 3 (7.32) | 8 (19.51) |
χ2 value | 4.100 | |||||
P value | 0.043 |
- Citation: Jiang W, Long XM, Wei KQ, Li SC, Zhang Z, He BF, Li H. Application effect of thoracoscopic tricuspid valvuloplasty in geriatric patients with tricuspid valve disease. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(15): 4810-4817
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i15/4810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4810