Jiang W, Long XM, Wei KQ, Li SC, Zhang Z, He BF, Li H. Application effect of thoracoscopic tricuspid valvuloplasty in geriatric patients with tricuspid valve disease. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(15): 4810-4817 [PMID: 35801058 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4810]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Xiao-Mao Long, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, The People’s Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, No. 6 Taoyuan Road, Qingxiu District, Nanning 530021, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. longluke369@163.com
Research Domain of This Article
Surgery
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. May 26, 2022; 10(15): 4810-4817 Published online May 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i15.4810
Table 1 The comparison of operation conditions between the two groups (mean ± SD)
Groups
Cases
Extracorporeal circulation time (min)
Aortic occlusion time (min)
Endotracheal intubation time (h)
Hospital stay (d)
Study group
41
109.35 ± 50.31
94.26 ± 59.61
12.59 ± 3.54
5.29 ± 2.34
Control group
41
114.91 ± 46.98
101.37 ± 61.44
13.11 ± 4.01
7.09 ± 3.11
t value
0.517
0.532
0.622
2.961
P value
0.606
0.596
0.535
0.004
Table 2 Comparison of inflammatory reaction related indices between the two groups before and after the operation (mean ± SD)
Groups
Cases
CRP (mg/L)
WBC (× 109/L)
Before the operation
Study group
41
4.69 ± 1.35
6.21 ± 1.97
Control group
41
5.01 ± 1.18
5.98 ± 2.01
t value
1.143
0.523
P value
0.257
0.602
After the operation
Study group
41
7.89 ± 1.73
10.76 ± 2.35
Control group
41
9.96 ± 2.04
14.84 ± 3.07
t value
4.955
6.757
P value
0.000
0.000
Table 3 Comparison of myocardial injury related indices between the two groups before and after the operation (mean ± SD)
Groups
Cases
cTnT (ng/mL)
CK-MB (mg/mL)
CK (U/L)
LDH (U/L)
Before the operation
Study group
41
0.04 ± 0.02
4.02 ± 1.11
91.35 ± 10.44
179.81 ± 60.04
Control group
41
0.05 ± 0.03
3.97 ± 1.05
89.69 ± 13.05
186.35 ± 56.96
t value
1.776
0.210
0.637
0.506
P value
0.080
0.835
0.526
0.614
After the operation
Study group
41
0.89 ± 0.32
26.96 ± 4.95
608.32 ± 202.33
282.56 ± 101.34
Control group
41
2.61 ± 0.69
34.37 ± 6.87
689.94 ± 214.64
369.15 ± 114.46
t value
14.480
5.603
1.772
3.627
P value
0.000
0.000
0.080
0.001
Table 4 Comparison of the incidence of adverse events between the two groups, n (%)
Groups
Cases
Arrhythmia
Infection
Low cardiac output syndrome
Pleural effusion
Total incidence
Study group
41
1 (2.44)
0 (0.00)
1 (2.44)
0 (0.00)
2 (4.88)
Control group
41
2 (4.88)
1 (2.44)
2 (4.88)
3 (7.32)
8 (19.51)
χ2 value
4.100
P value
0.043
Citation: Jiang W, Long XM, Wei KQ, Li SC, Zhang Z, He BF, Li H. Application effect of thoracoscopic tricuspid valvuloplasty in geriatric patients with tricuspid valve disease. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(15): 4810-4817