Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 6, 2022; 10(13): 4119-4130
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4119
Published online May 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4119
Table 1 Characteristics of included studies
| Ref. | Year | Country | Sample size | Surgery type | Intervention | Control | Initial training pressure (%) | Training time (min/d) | Sessions (n/wk) | Duration (wk) |
| Weiner et al[22] | 1997 | Israel | IMT: 17, Con: 15 | NR | Preoperative and postoperative IMT, incentive spirometry | Usual care | 15 | 60 | 6 | 14 |
| Brocki et al[23] | 2016 | Denmark | IMT: 34, Con: 34 | VATS: 35, thoracotomy: 33 | Preoperative IMT 30% MIP, postoperative: 15% MIP, breathing exercises, early mobilization | Breathing exercises, early mobilization | 30 | 15 | 7 | 2 |
| Brocki et al[24] | 2018 | Denmark | IMT: 34, Con: 34 | VATS: 35, thoracotomy: 33 | Preoperative IMT 30% MIP, postoperative: 15% MIP, breathing exercises, early mobilization | Breathing exercises, early mobilization | 30 | 15 | 7 | 2 |
| Taşkin et al[25] | 2018 | Turkey | RMT: 20, Con: 20 | Thoracotomy | Postoperative RMT, chest physiotherapy, early mobilization | Chest physiotherapy, early mobilization | 15 | Six sessions consisting of 3 sets of 10 breaths | 5 | NR |
| Messaggi-Sartor et al[26] | 2019 | Spain | RMT: 16, Con: 21 | VATS: 3, thoracotomy: 34 | Postoperative RMT, aerobic exercise | Usual care | 30 | 60 | 3 | 8 |
| Kendall et al[27] | 2020 | Portugal | IMT: 13, EMT: 13, IMT + EMT: 18, Con: 19 | Thoracotomy | Postoperative IMT or EMT or IMT + EMT, usual care | Usual care | 25 | 15 | 7 | 8 |
| Laurent et al[28] | 2020 | France | RMT: 14, Con: 12 | VATS or thoracotomy | Preoperative RMT, usual chest physical therapy | Usual chest physical therapy | 30 | 30 | 4 | 3 |
Table 2 Quality assessment for included trials according to Physiotherapy Evidence Database scoring scale
Table 3 Subgroup analysis about primary outcomes
| No. of studies | Mean | 95%CI | P value | Pheterogeneity | ||
| MIP | ||||||
| Intervention time | ||||||
| Preoperative | 1 | 12.33 | -5.49, 5.49 | > 0.999 | - | - |
| Postoperative | 2 | 12.33 | 3.55, 21.11 | 0.006 | 0.0 | 0.67 |
| Training method | ||||||
| IMT | 3 | 9.53 | 3.98, 15.08 | < 0.001 | 44 | 0.17 |
| EMT | 1 | 9.00 | -9.00, 27.00 | 0.33 | - | 0.13 |
| RMT | 3 | 6.97 | -2.81, 16.74 | 0.16 | 64 | - |
| MEP | ||||||
| Intervention time | ||||||
| Preoperative | 1 | 27 | 18.67, 35.33 | < 0.001 | - | - |
| Postoperative | 2 | 15.83 | -1.80, 33.45 | 0.08 | 58 | 0.12 |
| Training method | ||||||
| IMT | 2 | -3.49 | -10.57, 3.60 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.65 |
| EMT | 1 | 1.70 | -14.67 to 18.07 | 0.84 | - | - |
| RMT | 3 | 20.72 | 8.60, 32.84 | < 0.001 | 60 | 0.08 |
Table 4 Results about the effect of respiratory muscle training on patients receiving lung resection
| No. of studies | Mean | 95%CI | P value | Pheterogeneity | ||
| Primary outcomes | ||||||
| Respiratory function | ||||||
| MIP (cmH2O) | 5 | 8.13 | 1.31, 14.95 | 0.02 | 66 | 0.02 |
| MEP (cmH2O) | 4 | 13.51 | -4.47, 31.48 | 0.14 | 91 | < 0.001 |
| Secondary outcomes | ||||||
| Physical activity | 2 | - | - | 0.006/0.035 | - | - |
| Exercise capacity | ||||||
| 6MWD (m) | 3 | 9.96 | -34.61, 54.54 | 0.66 | 63 | 0.06 |
| CPET/VO2peak (mL/min/kg) | 2 | 2.44 | -2.36, 7.24 | 0.32 | 96 | < 0.001 |
| Pulmonary function | ||||||
| FEV1 (L) | 3 | 0.06 | -0.07, 0.19 | 0.39 | 13 | 0.32 |
| FVC (L) | 2 | 0.29 | -0.05, 0.64 | 0.10 | 0 | 0.96 |
| Quality of life | ||||||
| Pain (VAS) | 2 | 0.67 | -0.99, 2.32 | 0.43 | 61 | 0.11 |
| Dyspnoea (VAS) | 2 | -0.16 | -0.58, 0.25 | 0.44 | 0 | 0.61 |
| EORTC QLQ-C30 | 1 | - | - | - | - | - |
- Citation: Yang MX, Wang J, Zhang X, Luo ZR, Yu PM. Perioperative respiratory muscle training improves respiratory muscle strength and physical activity of patients receiving lung surgery: A meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(13): 4119-4130
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i13/4119.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i13.4119
