Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 6, 2022; 10(10): 3078-3087
Published online Apr 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3078
Published online Apr 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3078
Table 1 Baseline characteristic profiles and clinical outcomes in patient with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
| Baseline characteristics | |
| Age (yr, ≤ 70/ > 70) | 57/ 59 |
| Gender (female/male) | 49/ 67 |
| Comorbidity (-/+) | 75/ 41 |
| Location of tumor (distal CBD/proximal CBD/CHD or Klatskin tumor) | 51/43/22 |
| Preoperative drainage | |
| None | 5 |
| Endoscopic bile drainage | 87 |
| PTBD | 24 |
| Resection margin | |
| Negative | 72 |
| LGD positive | 19 |
| HGD/CIS positive | 25 |
| T stage (T1/2/3/4) | 42/ 49/ 25/ 0 |
| N stage (0/1) | 82/ 34 |
| Perineural invasion (-/+) | 41/ 75 |
| Lymphatic invasion (-/+) | 81/ 35 |
| Differentiation (well/ moderate/ poor) | 18/ 72/ 26 |
| CA 19-9 (≤ 37/> 37) | 44 / 72 |
| Op method | |
| BDR | 24 |
| PPPD or Whipple operation | 70 |
| BDR + hepatectomy | 19 |
| BDR+ PPPD or Whipple + hepatectomy | 3 |
| Adjuvant therapy (-/+) | 70 / 46 |
| Clinical outcomes | |
| Recurrence rate | 63 (54.3) |
| Time from operation to recurrence | 13 mo |
| Op related death | 10 (8.6) |
| ≤ 70 years old: 2/ 57 (3.5) | |
| > 70 years old: 8/ 59 (13.6) | |
| Mortality | 77 (66.4) |
| Cancer related mortality | 65/ 77(84.4) |
| Overall survival (mean) | 44.2 ± 3.43 mo |
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analyses for prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
| Univariate analysis for overall survival | ||
| Hazard ratio (95%CI) | P value | |
| Age (> 70 yr old) | 1.98 (1.21–3.23) | < 0.01 |
| Gender (female) | 1.18 (0.37–3.72) | 0.32 |
| Location of tumor | 0.02 | |
| distal CBD | 1 | |
| prox. CBD | 0.32 (0.10–1.02) | 0.06 |
| CHD or Klatskin tumor | 3.73 (0.69–20.2) | 0.13 |
| Op method | 0.35 | |
| BDR | 1 | |
| PPPD or Whipple operation | 1.09 (0.97- 1.23) | 0.42 |
| BDR + hepatectomy | 1.88 (0.28-12.63) | 0.51 |
| BDR+ PPPD or Whipple + hepatectomy | 19.35 (2.78-134.64) | < 0.01 |
| Resection margin | < 0.01 | |
| Negative | 1 | |
| LGD positive | 0.83 (0.42-1.63) | 0.58 |
| HGD/CIS positive | 7.72 (1.04-57.52) | 0.001 |
| T stage | 0.283 | |
| T1 | 1 | |
| T2 | 0.95 (0.15-5.94) | 0.105 |
| T3 | 1.53 (0.82-3.14) | 0.283 |
| N stage | ||
| N(-) | 1 | |
| N(+) | 1.31 (0.96-2.54) | 0.120 |
| Perineural invasion | 1.28 (0.8-2.1) | 0.329 |
| Lymphatic invasion | 1.13 (0.7-1.9) | 0.624 |
| Differentiation | 1.16 (0.5-2.6) | 0.814 |
| Well | 1 | |
| Moderate | 0.73 (0.20-2.63) | 0.625 |
| Poor | 2.07 (0.50-8.56) | 0.317 |
| CA 19-9 | 1.00 (0.99-1.00) | 0.592 |
| Comorbidity | 1.38 (0.92-2.21) | 0.173 |
| History of malignancy | 0.88 (0.4-1.8) | 0.707 |
| Adjuvant therapy | 0.31 (0.11-0.86) | 0.024 |
| Multivariate analysis for overall survival | ||
| Age (≥ 70 yr old) | 1.9 (1.2-3.1) | 0.01 |
| HGD/CIS positive margin | 2.47 (1.4-4.2) | 0.002 |
- Citation: Choe JW, Kim HJ, Kim JS. Significance of dysplasia in bile duct resection margin in patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(10): 3078-3087
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i10/3078.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3078
