Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 6, 2022; 10(10): 3060-3068
Published online Apr 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3060
Published online Apr 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3060
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between the two groups
Normal information | Therapy group (n = 41) | Control group (n = 41) | t/χ2 | P value |
Age (yr) | 30.5 ± 3.1 | 29.9 ± 3.5 | 0.822 | 0.414 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.7 ± 4.9 | 26.6 ± 4.2 | 1.091 | 0.278 |
Course of disease (mo) | 31.0 ± 7.1 | 32.0 ± 8.4 | -0.582 | 0.562 |
Exercise less (%) | 28 (68.29) | 28 (68.29) | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Stay up late (%) | 32 (78.05) | 35 (85.37) | 0.734 | 0.391 |
Spicy food (%) | 31 (75.61) | 30 (73.17) | 0.064 | 0.800 |
Greasy (%) | 27 (65.85) | 32 (78.05) | 1.511 | 0.219 |
Favorite sweets (%) | 27 (65.85) | 31 (75.61) | 0.943 | 0.332 |
Like cold drinks (%) | 26 (63.41) | 21 (51.22) | 1.246 | 0.264 |
Salty taste (%) | 15 (36.59) | 9 (21.95) | 2.121 | 0.145 |
Bitter taste (%) | 7 (17.07) | 6 (14.63) | 0.091 | 0.762 |
Sour taste (%) | 7 (17.07) | 3 (7.32) | 1.822 | 0.177 |
Regular diet (%) | 7 (17.07) | 7 (17.07) | 0.000 | 1.000 |
Obesity in childhood or adolescence (%) | 22 (53.66) | 18 (43.9) | 0.781 | 0.377 |
Long time stress (%) | 15 (36.59) | 11 (26.83) | 0.901 | 0.342 |
Family history of diabetes (%) | 25 (60.98) | 22 (53.66) | 0.449 | 0.503 |
Table 2 Comparison of traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores, acne scores, and hair scores between the two groups before and after treatment (mean ± SD, scores)
Index | Time | Therapy group (n = 37) | Control group (n = 37) | t | P value |
TCM syndrome score | Before treatment | 29.32 ± 7.66 | 27.84 ± 7.20 | 0.856 | 0.395 |
After treatment | 11.24 ± 3.72 | 24.29 ± 6.03 | -11.204 | 0.000 | |
Acne score | Before treatment | 1.41 ± 0.56 | 1.56 ± 0.59 | -1.122 | 0.266 |
After treatment | 0.56 ± 0.21 | 1.26 ± 0.38 | -9.807 | 0.000 | |
Hair score | Before treatment | 12.10 ± 3.90 | 11.10 ± 4.61 | 1.007 | 0.317 |
After treatment | 11.30 ± 2.70 | 10.79 ± 2.86 | 0.789 | 0.433 |
Table 3 Comparison of reproductive hormone levels between the two groups before and after treatment (mean ± SD)
Index | Time | Therapy group (n = 37) | Control group (n = 37) | t | P value |
T (ng/mL) | Before treatment | 0.56 ± 0.18 | 0.64 ± 0.24 | -1.622 | 0.109 |
After treatment | 0.39 ± 0.11 | 0.42 ± 0.12 | -1.121 | 0.266 | |
LH (mIU/mL) | Before treatment | 9.68 ± 2.31 | 10.70 ± 2.63 | -1.772 | 0.081 |
After treatment | 8.02 ± 1.82 | 9.44 ± 7.66 | -1.097 | 0.276 | |
FSH (mIU/mL) | Before treatment | 5.88 ± 1.22 | 6.46 ± 1.81 | -1.616 | 0.110 |
After treatment | 5.42 ± 1.36 | 5.84 ± 1.59 | -1.221 | 0.226 | |
LH/FSH | Before treatment | 1.80 ± 0.46 | 1.96 ± 0.58 | -1.315 | 0.193 |
After treatment | 1.48 ± 0.62 | 2.14 ± 0.77 | -4.061 | 0.000 |
Table 4 Traditional Chinese medicine syndrome curative effect index between the two groups after treatment, n (%)
Group | n | Clinical recovery | Markedly effective | Effective | Invalid | Total effective rate |
Therapy group | 37 | 14 | 10 | 12 | 1 | 36 (97.30) |
Control group | 37 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 20 (54.05) |
χ2 | 18.794 | |||||
P value | 0.000 |
Table 5 Comparison of the comprehensive effect between the two groups of patients before and after treatment, n (%)
Group | n | Clinical recovery | Markedly effective | Effective | Invalid | Total effective rate |
Therapy group | 37 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 34 (91.89) |
Control group | 37 | 3 | 5 | 12 | 17 | 20 (54.05) |
χ2 | 13.430 | |||||
P value | 0.000 |
- Citation: Liu R, Li M, Wang P, Yu M, Wang Z, Zhang GZ. Preventive online and offline health management intervention in polycystic ovary syndrome. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(10): 3060-3068
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i10/3060.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i10.3060