Published online Dec 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11248
Peer-review started: August 10, 2021
First decision: September 2, 2021
Revised: October 7, 2021
Accepted: November 3, 2021
Article in press: November 3, 2021
Published online: December 26, 2021
Processing time: 135 Days and 4.7 Hours
No reflow or slow flow frequently occurs during percutaneous coronary inter-vention (PCI) and it is associated with adverse outcomes. Strategies should be undertaken to prevent its occurrence.
To observe whether conventional target intracoronary administration of sodium nitroprusside immediately before balloon inflation can reduce the incidence of no reflow and slow flow, which are defined as thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grade ≤ II during PCI.
A retrospective study was conducted in 740 patients with coronary artery disease admitted to Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2016 and October 2020. Among them, 360 patients receiving sodium nitroprusside immediately before balloon inflation during PCI were enrolled in an experimental group between January 2019 and October 2020 and 380 patients receiving sodium nitroprusside after incident no reflow and slow flow during PCI were enrolled in a control group between January 2016 and January 2019. The occurrence of no reflow and slow flow was compared between the two groups and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were detected 1 mo after the operation.
After treatment, the proportion of patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow grades 0 to II was lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05). At 1 mo after treatment, LVEDD was lower and LVEF was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05). In terms of incidence of adverse cardiovascular events within 1 mo after treatment, in the experimental group, malignant arrhythmia occurred in three patients, intractable myocardial ischemia in three, congestive heart failure in four, and recurrent myocardial infarction in five; one patient died. In the control group, malignant arrhythmia occurred in eight patients, intractable myocardial ischemia in five, congestive heart failure in seven, and recurrent myocardial infarction in 14; two patients died. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events was 4.4% in experimental group which was lower than that of the control group at 1 mo after operation (9.5%; P < 0.05).
Administration of sodium nitroprusside into target vessels immediately before balloon inflation can significantly reduce the incidence of no reflow and slow flow, improve LVEDD and LVEF, and reduce the incidence of adverse cardio-vascular events in patients treated by PCI. It is worthy of clinical promotion.
Core Tip: The present study explored the effectiveness of coronary injection with nitroprusside, a commonly used vasodilator, as a pharmacological intervention strategy administered before balloon inflation for the prevention of no reflow or slow flow during percutaneous coronary intervention. The results showed that preventive use of sodium nitroprusside proved beneficial. It resulted in improved coronary blood flow and outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Citation: Yu Y, Yang BP. Sodium nitroprusside injection immediately before balloon inflation during percutaneous coronary intervention. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(36): 11248-11254
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i36/11248.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i36.11248
Coronary heart disease (CHD) is a common cardiac disease and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is an effective therapy for CHD with a high success rate[1-3]. Postoperative remission determines outcomes and quality of life in patients with CHD. However, no obvious stenosis was reported in the affected vessels in 5% to 30% patients after revascularization in stenosis or occlusion of the coronary artery. However, angiographic results indicated that antegrade flow was decreased or lost. Coronary angiographic results indicated that thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grades 0 to II are classified as coronary slow flow or no re-flow[4-6]. Coronary slow flow or no re-flow may lead to microcirculation hypoperfusion, continuous myocardial ischemia, abnormal myocardial metabolism in cancer cells, poor prognosis, rise in mortality, reinfarction rate, reinfarction rate, and reoperation rate, cardiac insufficiency, ventricular dilatation, obvious reconstruction, and increased mortality[7]. Sodium nitroprusside is usually used for vascular relaxation in the coronary microcirculation of patients with CHD. Sodium nitroprusside releases NO into blood, which is then degraded into bradykinin and dilate microvascular vessels and improve myocardial perfusion[8]. Previous studies[9,10] showed that sodium nitroprusside can improve blood flow in patients with no reflow and slow flow undergoing reperfusion. The present study aimed to explore whether target intravascular sodium nitroprusside injection immediately before balloon inflation or preventive use of sodium nitroprusside can reduce the incidence of no reflow and slow flow during PCI.
A retrospective study was conducted in 740 patients undergoing PCI at Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine between January 2016 and October 2020. Three hundred and sixty patients who were admitted to the hospital from January 2019 to October 2020 were included in an experimental group and 380 patients who were admitted to the hospital from January 2016 to January 2019 were included in a control group. Eligible participants included patients who ranged in age from 18 to 70 years, were diagnosed with CHD, or had a history of CHD with > 70% stenosis of the coronary artery on coronarography. Patients complicated with severe heart, lung, liver, and kidney dysfunction, severe diseases which caused psychological disorders or poor compliance, or other malignant cancer, and patients in poor physical condition and who are unable to tolerate surgery were excluded from the study. In the experimental group, 248 patients were male and 112 were female with average age of 32 to 68 (61.23 ± 10.14) years. Of them, 203 patients had a history of smoking and 157 were non-smokers. In terms of comorbidities, 187 patients had hypertension, 183 had hyperlipidemia, and 115 had a history of diabetes. For thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow grade, 338 patients had TIMI grades 0 to II and 22 had TIMI grade III. Infarction occurred in the anterior descending branch in 119 patients, in the circumflex branch in 123, and in the right coronary artery in 127. The average lesion length was 23.09 ± 5.67 mm. Balloon inflation was performed 1.87 ± 0.62 times. The proportion of stenosis was 83.69 ± 7.21%. In the control group, 261 patients were male and 119 were female. The average age was 31 to 69 (62.35 ± 11.47) years. Of them, 212 were smokers and 168 were non-smokers, 196 patients had hypertension, 188 had hyperlipidemia, and 121 had diabetes. With regards to TIMI flow grade, 345 patients had TIMI grades 0 to II and 35 had TIMI grade III. Infarction occurred in the anterior descending branch in 131 patients, in the circumflex branch in 128, and in the right coronary artery in 134. The average lesion length was 22.96 ± 6.12 mm. Balloon inflation was performed 1.87 ± 0.62 times. The proportion of stenosis was 82.37 ± 7.19%. There was no significant difference in general information such as age, gender, or disease type between the two groups with high compatibility (P > 0.05).
All patients received oral aspirin (Bayer Healthcare Co Ltd, Cat. No. J20130078) 300 mg and tegrello (AstraZeneca AB, Cat. No. J20130020) 180 mg before undergoing acute PCI in the catheter room. Arterial puncture was achieved through the radial artery or the femoral artery. Then, low molecular weight heparin calcium injection (Sanofi Winthrop Industrie, Cat. No. H20080481) 3000 IU was administered. The experimental group received target intravascular sodium nitroprusside injection 200 μg immediately before balloon inflation (China Resources Double-Crane Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Cat. No. H11020635). The control group received sodium nitroprusside injection after no reflow and slow flow occurred during the operation.
The outcomes of the study included the incidence of no reflow and slow flow during PCI which was assessed by two experienced interventional physicians 30 min after the treatment. The diagnostic criteria were TIMI grade for antegrade flow < II after PCI when no obvious stenosis was reported in the affected vessels[11]. Left cardiac function indexes were compared, including left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1 mo after the operation. The incidence of adverse cardiac events was compared, including malignant arrhythmia, intractable myocardial ischemia, congestive heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarctions, and death at 1 mo after the operation.
SPSS22.0 software was used for data processing. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± SD. Qualitative data are expressed as percentages. Inter-group difference was compared using χ2 test. P < 0.05 represented that there was a significant difference.
For posttreatment TIMI flow grade, the proportion of patients who had TIMI grades 0 to II was lower in the experimental group than in the control group, and the proportion of patients who had TIMI grade III was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05; Table 1).
Group | n | TIMI | |
Grades 0 to II | Grade III | ||
Experimental | 360 | 28 (7.8) | 332 (92.2) |
Control | 380 | 79 (20.8) | 301 (79.2) |
χ2 value | 12.422 | 12.422 | |
P value | 0.001 | 0.001 |
When comparing left ventricular function indices between the two groups, it was found that LVEDD was lower and LVEF was higher in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05; Table 2).
Group | n | LVEDD (mm) | LVEF (%) |
Experimental | 360 | 54.21 ± 5.38 | 50.83 ± 8.38 |
Control | 380 | 56.78 ± 4.90 | 47.56 ± 5.47 |
t value | 6.329 | 7.542 | |
P value | 0.034 | 0.027 |
In terms of incidence of adverse cardiovascular events within 1 mo after treatment, in the experimental group, malignant arrhythmia occurred in three patients, intractable myocardial ischemia in three, congestive heart failure in four, and recurrent myocardial infarction in five; one patient died. In the control group, malignant arrhythmia occurred in eight patients, intractable myocardial ischemia in five, congestive heart failure in seven, and recurrent myocardial infarction in 14; two patients died. The incidence of adverse cardiovascular events was 4.4% in the experimental group, which was lower than that of the control group at 1 mo after operation (9.5%; P < 0.05; Table 3).
Group | n | Malignant arrhythmia | Intractable myocardial ischemia | Congestive heart failure | Recurrent myocardial infarction | Death | Overall incidence |
Experimental | 360 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 16 (4.4) |
Control | 380 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 14 | 2 | 36 (9.5) |
χ2 value | 9.124 | ||||||
P value | 0.001 |
PCI is one of the most used choices for the treatment of coronary heart disease. It opens blocked arteries, improves function of the heart, and protects cardiac muscle cells in a short time[12,13]. Sodium nitroprusside helps alleviate no reflow and slow flow during PCI, reduce myocardial microdamage, modulate local inflammatory response to protect cardiac muscle cells, improve heart function, cardiac ejection function, and outcomes, and reduce adverse cardiac events[14,15]. The present study explored whether preventive use of sodium nitroprusside or intravascular sodium nitroprusside injection immediately before balloon inflation can reduce no reflow and slow flow during PCI.
Coexisting diseases such as diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipemia, and multiple microangiopathic lesions are common in patients with coronary heart disease, leading to a high risk of no reflow and slow flow associated with PCI[16]. The occurrence of no reflow and slow flow may be attributed to distal microembolization of the coronary circulation, injury associated with microvascular reperfusion microvascular obstruction, and spasm[17,18]. Moreover, blood platelet and leukocyte levels, cell swelling in the myocardium, and stromal edema may cause no reflow and slow flow. Sodium nitroprusside as a vasodilator is used in patients experiencing no reflow and slow flow during PCI[19]. Sodium nitroprusside functions as an NO direct donor, releasing NO into the vascular vessels, which may result in significant dilation of arterioles and improvement of coronary microcirculation[20]. The present study found that target intravascular sodium nitroprusside injection immediately before balloon inflation can significantly reduce the incidence of no reflow and slow flow during PCI. This can be explained by timely use of sodium nitroprusside which can prevent reperfusion injury[21]. Meanwhile, target intravascular sodium nitroprusside injection immediately before balloon inflation over 1 mo can reduce LVEDD and increase LVEF, suggesting that sodium nitroprusside injection immediately before balloon inflation can improve outcomes and cardiac ejection function. This may be attributed to reduced time of reperfusion. Thus, it can effectively open vessels, relieve a blockage, and reduce reperfusion injury[22-24]. Furthermore, the current study revealed that target intravascular sodium nitroprusside injection immediately before balloon inflation can reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events at 1 mo and improve long-term treatment effectiveness.
In summary, target intravascular sodium nitroprusside injection immediately before balloon inflation can reduce the incidence of no reflow and slow flow during PCI, significantly improving LVEDD and LVEF and reducing postoperative incidence of adverse cardiac events. Multi-center large sample studies are needed to further verify the findings of the study.
The incidence of no reflow or slow flow appears to be high in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This may lead to microvascular obstruction and endothelial disruption. Nipride has been proved effective in treating no reflow or slow flow.
How does sodium nitroprusside benefit in the prevention of no reflow or slow flow? Does the time of administration affect the efficacy of sodium nitroprusside in the prevention of no reflow or slow flow?
The present study was conducted to evaluate efficacy and usefulness of sodium nitroprusside administrated before balloon inflation in prevention of no reflow or slow flow.
Patients with CHD undergoing PCI were included. They were divided into two groups. The experimental group received sodium nitroprusside immediately before balloon inflation and the control group received sodium nitroprusside after no reflow or slow flow occurred during the PCI. The incidence of no reflow or slow flow was compared between the two groups. Moreover, thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade, cardiac function, and adverse events were also compared between the two groups.
TIMI grade and cardiac function were better in the experimental group than in the control group. The incidence of adverse events was lower in the experimental group than in the control group.
Sodium nitroprusside administrated immediately before balloon inflation is useful for the prevention of no reflow or slow flow during PCI.
Long-term, larger sample size and high-quality follow-up RCTs are needed for preventive use of sodium nitroprusside in patients with cardiac disease undergoing PCI.
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Country/Territory of origin: China
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): 0
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Sip M S-Editor: Wang JL L-Editor: Wang TQ P-Editor: Wang JL
1. | Mahmoud MS, Hanan KK, Mohammad EE. Assessment of the Clinical and Procedural Predictive Factors of No-Reflow Phenomenon Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Med J Cairo Univ. 2021;89:409-417. [Cited in This Article: ] |
2. | Esenboğa K, Kurtul A, Yamantürk YY, Tan TS, Tutar DE. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts no-reflow phenomenon after primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Acta Cardiol. 2021;1-8. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 22] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 41] [Article Influence: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Rezkalla SH, Stankowski RV, Hanna J, Kloner RA. Management of No-Reflow Phenomenon in the Catheterization Laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:215-223. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 99] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 146] [Article Influence: 20.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Zhao S, Qi G, Tian W, Chen L, Sun Y. Effect of intracoronary nitroprusside in preventing no reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. J Interv Cardiol. 2014;27:356-364. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 23] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23] [Article Influence: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | Niu X, Zhang J, Bai M, Peng Y, Sun S, Zhang Z. Effect of intracoronary agents on the no-reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2018;18:3. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 19] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Su Q, Li L, Naing KA, Sun Y. Safety and effectiveness of nitroprusside in preventing no-reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014;68:201-206. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 15] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Qi Q, Niu J, Chen T, Yin H, Wang T, Jiang Z. Intracoronary Nicorandil and the Prevention of the No-Reflow Phenomenon During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Med Sci Monit. 2018;24:2767-2776. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Zhang W, Dai J, Zheng X, Xu K, Yang X, Shen L, Wang X, Hao Z, Qiu X, Jiang L, Shi H, He B. Myocardial protective effect of intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil via targeted perfusion microcatheter in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e25551. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Article Influence: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Lyu J, Zheng XT, Li YP. Sodium nitroprusside and dopamine for the treatment of severe congestive heart failure: A clinical observation. Xinxueguan Kangfu Yixue Zazhi. 2009;18:284-286. [Cited in This Article: ] |
10. | Hao YX. Effect of balloon dilatation after stent placement on long-term outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing acute percutaneous coronary intervention. M.Sc. Thesis, Capital Medical University. 2015. Available from: https://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/thesis/Y3144738. [Cited in This Article: ] |
11. | An S, Huang H, Wang H, Jiang Y. Prophylactically injection of Nicorandil to reduce no-reflow phenomenon during PCI in acute STEMI patients: Protocol of a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e25500. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | Zhou SS, Tian F, Chen YD, Wang J, Sun ZJ, Guo J, Jin QH. Combination therapy reduces the incidence of no-reflow after primary per-cutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015;12:135-142. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 16] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Celik T, Balta S, Ozturk C, Kaya MG, Aparci M, Yildirim OA, Demir M, Unlu M, Demirkol S, Kilic S, Iyisoy A. Predictors of No-Reflow Phenomenon in Young Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Angiology. 2016;67:683-689. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 28] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Zhao YJ, Fu XH, Ma XX, Wang DY, Dong QL, Wang YB, Li W, Xing K, Gu XS, Jiang YF. Intracoronary fixed dose of nitroprusside via thrombus aspiration catheter for the prevention of the no-reflow phenomenon following primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction. Exp Ther Med. 2013;6:479-484. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 25] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | Yang L, Mu L, Sun L, Qi F, Guo R. Effect of intracoronary nitroprusside injection on flow recovery during primary PCI in acute STEMI patients. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2017;65:111-118. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Kobatake R, Sato T, Fujiwara Y, Sunami H, Yoshioka R, Ikeda T, Saito H, Ujihira T. Comparison of the effects of nitroprusside versus nicorandil on the slow/no-reflow phenomenon during coronary interventions for acute myocardial infarction. Heart Vessels. 2011;26:379-384. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 30] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Shinozaki N, Ichinose H, Yahikozawa K, Shimada H, Hoshino K. Selective intracoronary administration of nitroprusside before balloon dilatation prevents slow reflow during percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Int Heart J. 2007;48:423-433. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 24] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 26] [Article Influence: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Chen GX, Wang HN, Zou JL, Yuan XX. Effects of intracoronary injection of nicorandil and tirofiban on myocardial perfusion and short-term prognosis in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after emergency PCI. World J Emerg Med. 2020;11:157-163. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Li M, Wu Z, Yuan Y, Feng L, Lao Y, Guo Z. Delayed angioplasty is superior to an emergency strategy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients who present late and with infarct artery spontaneous reperfusion before intervention. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2019;30:162-167. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Nishio M, Ueda Y, Matsuo K, Tsujimoto M, Hao H, Asai M, Nemoto T, Wada M, Hirata A, Murakami A, Kashiwase K, Kodama K. Association of target lesion characteristics evaluated by coronary computed tomography angiography and plaque debris distal embolization during percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J. 2014;78:2203-2208. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 7] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Garcia JR, Campbell PF, Kumar G, Langberg JJ, Cesar L, Wang L, García AJ, Levit RD. A Minimally Invasive, Translational Method to Deliver Hydrogels to the Heart Through the Pericardial Space. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2017;2:601-609. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 21] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Gu J, Zhuo Y, Liu TJ, Li J, Yin ZF, Xu ZJ, Fan L, He Q, Chen K, Zeng HS, Wang XF, Fan YQ, Zhang JF, Liang FY, Wang CQ. Balloon Deflation Strategy during Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial and Numerical Simulation-Based Analysis. Cardiol Res Pract. 2020;2020:4826073. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | Feng C, Han B, Liu Y, Wang L, Niu D, Lou M, Lu C. Effect of nicorandil administration on myocardial microcirculation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2018;14:26-31. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 5] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8] [Article Influence: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
24. | Gao MD, Zhang EY, Liu YY, Li XW, Xiao JY, Sun GY, Liu Y. Intracoronary pressure gradient measurement in acute myocardial infarction patients with the no-reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020;133:766-772. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |