Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 26, 2021; 9(33): 10244-10248
Published online Nov 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i33.10244
Subsequent placenta accreta after previous mifepristone-induced abortion: A case report
Peng Zhao, Ying Zhao, Department of Obstetrics, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu 322000, Zhejiang Province, China
Jing He, Xiao-Xia Bai, Department of Obstetrics, Women’s Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, Zhejiang Province, China
Jian Chen, Department of Ultrasonography, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu 322000, Zhejiang Province, China
ORCID number: Peng Zhao (0000-0003-4110-2735); Ying Zhao (0000-0002-1773-7178); Jing He (0000-0001-2345-6789); Xiao-Xia Bai (0000-0003-1684-8359); Jian Chen (0000-0003-2295-5505).
Author contributions: Zhao P and He J designed the research study; Zhao P and Zhao Y performed the literature research; Zhao P, Zhao Y, Chen J and Bai XX contributed data acquisition and data analysis; Zhao P and Zhao Y wrote the manuscript; He J, Bai XX and Chen J critically revised the manuscript; All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Informed consent statement: Written informed consent for publication was obtained from the patient.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declared no conflict of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and publication of this article.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Jian Chen, MD, Chief Physician, Department of Ultrasonography, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, No. N1 Shangcheng Dadao, Yiwu 322000, Zhejiang Province, China. chenjianzuj4h@zju.edu.cn
Received: March 17, 2021
Peer-review started: March 17, 2021
First decision: April 13, 2021
Revised: September 22, 2021
Accepted: October 14, 2021
Article in press: October 14, 2021
Published online: November 26, 2021
Processing time: 249 Days and 21.1 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Mifepristone-induced abortion (MIA) has been used worldwide to terminate pregnancies. However, the association between placenta accrete (PA) and MIA has seldom been reported.

CASE SUMMARY

A 26-year-old pregnant woman presented with painless vaginal bleeding at 35 wk of gestation. She had a medical abortion (mifepristone followed by misoprostol) 1 year ago at the sixth week of gestation. Her personal history for previous surgery was negative. Abdominal ultrasonography showed a normal foetus with complete placenta previa. The foetal membrane ruptured with massive vaginal bleeding and severe abdominal pain. An emergency Caesarean section was performed, and the newborn was delivered. The placenta failed to expel and manual extraction was carried out. A large defect was noted in the uterine fundus and repair of the uterine rupture was conducted immediately. The postoperative pathology report showed placenta accreta.

CONCLUSION

The evidence suggests a possible etiologic role of MIA in PA, as the incidence of PA after MIA is much higher than general population. Millions of pregnancies are complicated by PA each year, some of which result in fatality. To prevent subsequent placental complications after MIA, hormonal supplementation might be a promising therapeutic options. However, further studies are needed to identify the high-risk factors and to confirm the effectiveness of estrogen supplement therapy.

Key Words: Mifepristone-induced abortion; Placenta accreta; Uterine rupture; Placental complications; Hormonal supplementation; Case report

Core Tip: The main findings of the current study are (1) a potential association between placenta accrete (PA) and mifepristone-induced abortion (MIA); and (2) the prevalence of PA after MIA has been neglected and underestimated for a long time. Millions of pregnancies are complicated by PA each year, some of which result in fatality. To prevent subsequent placental complications after MIA, hormonal supplementation might be a promising therapeutic option. However, further study is needed to identify risk factors and to confirm the effectiveness of estrogen supplement therapy.



INTRODUCTION

Considered as the most popular abortion choice, mifepristone-induced abortion (MIA) has been used to terminate unwanted pregnancies. It has been estimated that 3 million women received mifepristone in combination with misoprostol in France, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and China in 2000[1]. Since then, the worldwide use of MIA has expanded. By 2003, the estimated number of induced abortions has reached 46 million[2]. The immediate side effects of MIA have been well studied and the long term outcomes still need full evaluation. There have been published findings of placental complications, such as retained placenta[3], placental abruption[4], and placenta previa[5] associated with MIA. However, placenta accreta (PA) has been seldom reported. The aim of this study was to (1) report a case of PA after a previous MIA; (2) review the literature; and (3) evaluate the risk factors and therapeutic strategies for preventing placental complications.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 26-year-old (gravida 2, parity woman presented at our emergency department at 33 wk of gestation with a chief complaint of painless vaginal bleeding for 5 h.

History of present illness

There was no fever, vaginal bleeding, vaginal discharge, or any other symptoms.

History of past illness

She had a medical abortion (mifepristone followed by misoprostol) 1 year ago at the sixth week of gestation. Her personal history for previous surgery, including cervical and uterine surgery, was negative.

Personal and family history

No significant personal history or hereditary family history was noted.

Physical examination

The patient’s vital signs were normal on admission. Vaginal spotting was noted. No abdominal sharp tenderness or rebound pain were present. Vaginal examination revealed that the cervix was closed and its length was in the normal range. There was no vaginal fluid.

Laboratory examination

She was hemodynamically stable with normal liver function tests, normal coagulation profile and a haemoglobin level of 10.8 mg/dL. Cardiotocography, C-reaction protein, and fetal non-stress test results were normal.

Imaging examination

Abdominal ultrasonography showed a normal foetus with the placenta located in the anterior uterine wall. The fundus and the lower margin of the placenta completely covered the internal orifice of the cervix (complete placenta previa). No fluid was detected in the pouch of Douglas.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with complete placenta previa at week 33 of gestation.

TREATMENT

Dexamethasone was administered instantly to the mother to promote foetal lung maturation. The patient stayed hospitalized for recurrent vaginal bleeding and tocolytics were given accordingly. 12 d later at 35 wk of gestation, the foetal membranes ruptured with massive vaginal bleeding and severe abdominal pain. An emergency Caesarean section was performed and a newborn was delivered with a birth weight of 2500 g and an Apgar score of 9 at 5 min and 10 at 10 min. The placenta failed to expel and manual extraction was carried out. The placenta was tightly attached and was difficult to remove. A large 5 cm × 3 cm defect was noted in the uterine fundus after manual removal of the placenta (Figure 1). Repair of the uterine defect was conducted immediately. The surgery went well with an estimated blood loss of 1000 mL.

Figure 1
Figure 1 A large uterine defect was noted in the fundus after manual removal of the placenta.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The pathology report showed placenta accreta. The patient was discharged 6 d after surgery and recovered uneventfully during follow-up.

DISCUSSION

This preliminary study showed that there was a potential association between PA and MIA. In theory, the use of mifepristone to induce abortion is associated with endometrial haemorrhage and extracellular matrix degradation, which may cause irreversible injury to the endometrium[6]. If the severity of injury exceeds the self-repair capacity of the uterus, long term adverse effects are likely to occur. PA, defined as the invasion of chorionic villi into the myometrium, is one of the clinical manifestations of such a condition. This study also demonstrated that the prevalence of PA after MIA has been neglected and underestimated for a long time. It has been reported that the incidence of PA after MIA was 0.5%[7], which is twelve-fold higher than the 0.04% estimated in pregnant women in the general population[8]. Between 2010 and 2014, an estimated 55.9 million induced abortions were performed worldwide[9], with 65.1% of the women having subsequent pregnancies[10]. To put the above estimates into real-world terms, there would be 0.2 million pregnancies complicated by PA. Moreover, the misuse of over the counter or black market mifepristone by self-administration potentially poses a serious danger. For example, in India, 5 million unsafe abortions are performed each year, and 31.25% of the patients had a history of self-administration of abortion pills[11]. Therefore, the actual number of pregnancies complicated by PA after MIA can be assumed to be much higher than the estimated number.

The prevention of PA after MIA is a major concern of physicians during clinical practice. Sporadic studies have shown hormonal supplementation to be one of the promising options to prevent endometrial injury after MIA[12-16]. Administration of estrogen before or after MIA increases endometrial proliferation and reduces the risk of endometrial injury. The details of studies of post-[12-16] and pre-MIA hormonal supplementation[17] are shown in Table 1. However, the previously described effectiveness of estrogen supplementation needs to be verified by a larger and more suitable clinical trial. Additionally, prescribing estrogen for every patient would lead to a significant financial burden and consumption of precious resources. Therefore, it is important to identify the risk factors that increase the risk of PA associated with MIA. Several observational studies[7,18,19] showed that multiple MIAs, prolonged duration of vaginal bleeding after MIA, gestational age more than 6 wk at MIA, and an interpregnancy interval longer than 18 mo might be associated with placental complications. In this report, the patient had one clinical feature that could be identified as a risk factor, and that was a gestational age of more than 6 wk at MIA. Further study should be conducted to confirm the risk factors.

Table 1 Studies of estrogen administration following mifepristone-induced abortion.
Ref.
Hormone regimen
Dose
Duration
Martin et al[12], 1988Post-operation, oral contraceptiveEthinyl oestradiol 30 µg; levonorgestrel 150 µgStart on the day of abortion, daily for 21 d
Tang et al[13], 2002Post-operation, oral contraceptiveEthinyl oestradiol 30 µg; levonorgestrel 150 µgStart 1 d after the administration of misoprostol, daily for 21 d
Liu et al[14], 2006Post-operation, estrogenic supplementationOestradiol valerate 1mgStart 1 d after abortion, daily for 14-18 d
Wang et al[15], 2011Post-operation, oestrogenic-progesterone sequential administrationOestradiol valerate 2 mg; Medroxyprogesterone 10 mgOestradiol valerate, start 1 d after abortion, daily for 21 d; Medroxyprogesterone, daily for the last 5 d
Farhi et al[16], 1993Post-operation, oestrogenic-progesterone sequential administrationOestradiol valerate 2 mg; Norgestrel 0.5 mgOestradiol valerate, start 1 d after abortion, daily for 21 d; Norgestrel, daily for the last 10 d
Luo et al[17], 2012Pre-operation, oestrogen supplementationOestradiol valerate 5 mgOestradiol valerate, daily for 3 d before abortion
CONCLUSION

In conclusion, there is evidence of a possible etiologic role of MIA in PA, as the incidence of PA after MIA is much higher than it is in the general population. Millions of pregnancies are complicated by PA each year, some of which result in fatality. Hormonal supplementation might effective for preventing placental complication subsequent to MIA. However, further studies needed to identify risk factors and to confirm the effectiveness of estrogen supplementation therapy.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We would like to thank Dr. Joynauth Jyotsnav for his critical review and language editing of this study.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Specialty type: Obstetrics and gynecology

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): B

Grade C (Good): C, C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Levine E, Omar NS S-Editor: Gong ZM L-Editor: Filipodia P-Editor: Gong ZM

References
1.  Virk J, Zhang J, Olsen J. Medical abortion and the risk of subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:648-653.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 56]  [Article Influence: 3.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Liao H, Wei Q, Duan L, Ge J, Zhou Y, Zeng W. Repeated medical abortions and the risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:579-586.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Zhou W, Nielsen GL, Larsen H, Olsen J. Induced abortion and placenta complications in the subsequent pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80:1115-1120.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 24]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Lin TB, Hsieh MF, Hou YC, Hsueh YL, Chang HP, Tseng YT. Long-term physical health consequences of abortion in Taiwan, 2000 to 2013: A nationwide retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97:e11785.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Johnson LG, Mueller BA, Daling JR. The relationship of placenta previa and history of induced abortion. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;81:191-198.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Männistö J, Mentula M, Bloigu A, Hemminki E, Gissler M, Heikinheimo O, Niinimäki M. Medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy in primigravid women--is the next delivery differently at risk? BJOG. 2013;120:331-337.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Zhu QX, Gao ES, Chen AM, Luo L, Cheng YM, Yuan W. Mifepristone-induced abortion and placental complications in subsequent pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:315-319.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 21]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  ACOG Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee opinion. Number 266, January 2002: placenta accreta. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:169-170.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Sedgh G, Bearak J, Singh S, Bankole A, Popinchalk A, Ganatra B, Rossier C, Gerdts C, Tunçalp Ö, Johnson BR Jr, Johnston HB, Alkema L. Abortion incidence between 1990 and 2014: global, regional, and subregional levels and trends. Lancet. 2016;388:258-267.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 412]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 368]  [Article Influence: 46.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Yan M, Shen J, Su S, Wang Y. The correlation between pregnancy and delivery history and abortion effect in women with medical abortion. Zhongguo Fuyou Baojian. 19: 1970-1971.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
11.  Nivedita K, Shanthini F. Is It Safe to Provide Abortion Pills over the Counter? J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9:QC01-QC04.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 2]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Martin CW, Brown AH, Baird DT. A pilot study of the effect of methotrexate or combined oral contraceptive on bleeding patterns after induction of abortion with mifepristone and a prostaglandin pessary. Contraception. 1998;58:99-103.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 19]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Tang OS, Xu J, Cheng L, Lee SW, Ho PC. The effect of contraceptive pills on the measured blood loss in medical termination of pregnancy by mifepristone and misoprostol: a randomized placebo controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:99-102.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 20]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Liu C, Guan J, Shen H, Feng Y, Zhang D, Hu M, Fang H. Estrogen Promoting Endometrium Regeneration after Medical Abortion. Zhongguo Jihua Shengyu Zazhi. 2006;125:165-166.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
15.  Wang C, Huang Z, Li X. Effects of taking estrogen and progestogen after medical abortionon reducing vaginal hemorrhage time: a randomized-controlled trial. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2011;91:3179-3181.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 22]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 23]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  Farhi J, Bar-Hava I, Homburg R, Dicker D, Ben-Rafael Z. Induced regeneration of endometrium following curettage for abortion: a comparative study. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1143-1144.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 54]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 73]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Luo F. Clinical Application of Estradiol Valerate Combined with Anti-pregnancy Pills in Missed Abortion. Shiyong Linchuang Yixue. 2012;13:66-68.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
18.  Chen AQ, Fang H. The effect on susequent pregnancies after induced abortion or medical abortion. Zhongguo Fuyou Baojian. 2006;21:3235-3236.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]
19.  Lopes A, King PA, Duthie SJ, To WK, Ma HK. The impact of multiple induced abortions on the outcome of subsequent pregnancy. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;31:41-43.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 13]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]