Ultrasonographic evaluation of the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on calcific tendinopathy of the rectus femoris tendon: A case report

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Calcific tendinopathy denotes calcific deposits in a specific tendon. It is also known as calcifying tendinitis, calcifying periarticulitis, or periarticular apatite deposition disease. Recently, extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has been reported to be effective in relieving and treating pain in calcific tendinopathy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 36-year-old female patient suffered from left hip joint pain for six months. The pain was increased during abduction of the hip, waking, and jumping. B-mode ultrasonography was performed by a physiatrist with an L12-5 linear transducer. A single session of ESWT was given in the marking area under ultrasound guidance at 4 Hz, 2500 shots with intensity of stimulation using energy of 0.1 mJ/mm². The hip pain of the patient slowly decreased within 4 wk after starting the ESWT. After six weeks of ESWT, her hip pain was completely resolved. However, the size of calcification showed almost no reduction in simple radiography at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasonography is a very good modality not only for diagnosing calcified tendinitis by classical appearance, but also for evaluating the effect of ESWT during the follow-up period.

Key Words: Rectus femoris; Calcific tendinopathy; Extracorporeal shock wave therapy; Ultrasonography; Hip; Joint; Case report

Core tip: As a feature of ultrasonography, high resolution shows the presence of deposits and defines their locations in the tendon, plus their size and texture. This technique enables staging of the deposits by correlation of shadow cones. In the resting phase, the deposits appear hyperechoic and arc shaped, whereas they appear non-arc shaped (fragmented/punctate and cystic) in the resolving phase. These appearances can also be correlated with the symptomatic and asymptomatic phases of the disease.

INTRODUCTION

Calcific tendinopathy denotes calcific deposits in a specific tendon. It is also known as calcifying tendinitis, calcifying periarticulitis, or periarticular apatite deposition disease[1,2]. Causes of calcific tendinopathy have not been clearly clarified yet. According to previous studies, repeated use of attachment site and focal ischemia, cartilage degeneration, and calcium deposition at the tendon attachment site are main causes of calcific tendinopathy. In addition, severe acute or chronic pain frequently occurs due to degradation of calcium deposits. To treat calcific tendinopathy, various methods have been used, including administration of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAID) to the calcified lesion, needle aspiration, and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT). However, surgical treatment is rarely necessary.

Recently, ESWT has been reported to be effective in relieving and treating pain in calcific tendinopathy[3]. Investigating treatment effects is usually based on clinical measurement and typical findings of plain radiography, locating calcific depositions in the tendon or bursa[4]. However, plain radiography can lead to mistakes without additional check-up with other diagnostic tools such as computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance image (MRI). Recently, a few studies have used ultrasonography to determine the effect of treatment on calcific tendinopathy[5,6]. However, there are only two reports of ESWT for treating calcified tendinopathy around hip joint compared to that for treating calcified tendinopathy of rotator cuff or Achilles tendon[1,2].

To the best of our knowledge, no case report has described the usefulness of ultrasonography in the treatment of calcific tendinopathy around rectus femoris tendon using ESWT. Herein, we report a case of calcific tendinopathy of rectus femoris successfully treated with ESWT. Our case shows the importance of using ultrasonography to determine the effect of treatment when simple radiography does not reveal difference of calcific deposit over the rectus femoris tendon.

CASE PRESENTATION

Chief complaints

A 36-year-old female patient suffered from left hip joint pain for six months. The pain was increased during abduction of the hip, waking, and jumping.

History of present illness

Initially, the pain was treated with acetaminophen, with some success. Symptoms subsided the following day but recurred quite severely on the third day, requiring admission to a community hospital for treatment. The pain was non-radiating and was exacerbated with any movement of the left hip. There was no fever, chills, preceding systemic illness, or infection.

Since then, there was no pain improvement even after 6 mo of continuous treatment.

History of past illness

No other health conditions are reported.

Personal and family history

She had no specific history of trauma or underlying disease.

Physical examination upon admission

On physical examination, limitation of range of motion was revealed due to pain. No evidence of infection was observed. There was evidence of infection such as fever, heating sensation, redness, fluctuation, and swelling.

Laboratory examinations

All routine laboratory findings were within normal limits.

Imaging examinations

Simple radiograph including anteroposterior view and lateral view revealed nodular-shaped deposits at the anterior inferior iliac spine site as the origin of rectus femoris muscle (Figure 1). For further evaluation and ESWT, B-mode ultrasonography was performed by a physiatrist with expertise in using a Philips iU 22 ultrasound system (Philips Health Care, Andover, MA, United States) with an L12-5 linear transducer. The patient was asked to lie in a supine position on the examination table while her knee was straightened and the ankle was relaxed. Longitudinal and transverse ultrasonographic images of the calcification of the left rectus femoris were evaluated before ESWT (Figure 2). Dornier Aries (Dornier MedTech, Wessling, Germany) was used for ESWT.

Figure 1 An anteroposterior radiography of the left hip. A: An anteroposterior radiography of the left hip showing an amorphous calcification (white arrow) adjacent to the anterior inferior iliac spine which is the attachment site of the rectus tendon, suggesting calcific tendinopathy of rectus femoris; B: The lesion (white arrow) was more clearly defined at the lateral view.

Figure 2 Longitudinal ultrasonographic image. A: Longitudinal ultrasonographic image showing a solid calcific nodule (white arrow) at 1.70 cm × 0.85 cm in size adjacent to the insertion site of the rectus femoris tendon; B: An arc shaped lesion (white arrow) of 1.43 cm × 0.94 cm was also defined at the transverse ultrasonographic image. AIIS: Anterior inferior iliac spine; RF: Rectus femoris.

FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Calcific tendinitis of rectus femoris muscle.

TREATMENT

We marked the calcification with a pen to accurately deliver shock wave. Pressure pulses were focused at the marking area that was identified through the ultrasound. A single session of ESWT was given in the marking area under ultrasound guidance at 4 Hz, 2500 shots with intensity of stimulation using energy of 0.1 mJ/mm². ESWT was performed a total of six times at an interval of 3-4 d. The patient’s posture was the same as that of the ultrasound scan. Complementary NSAIDs (Celecoxib) were started.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

The hip pain of patient slowly decreased within four weeks after starting the ESWT. After 6 wk, her hip pain was completely resolved. However, the size of calcification showed almost no reduction in simple radiography at the final follow-up (Figure 3). We performed ultrasonography, showing that calcium deposit was decreased, with huge calcification disintegrated into smaller pieces on transverse image (Figure 4).

Figure 3 Simple radiography. A: The size of calcification was almost not reduced in simple radiography at the final follow-up; B: The lesion (white arrow) was still clearly defined at lateral view.

Figure 4 Ultrasonographic image of rectus femoris calcification after extracorporeal shock wave therapy. A: The calcium deposit was decreased (1.42 cm × 0.61 cm) on longitudinal image; B: Huge calcification disintegrates into smaller pieces on transverse image. AIIS: Anterior inferior iliac spine; RF: Rectus femoris.

DISCUSSION

Several cases of calcific tendinopathy of the rectus femoris have been reported[7]. However, there is only one report of treatment using ESWT of calcified tendinopathy of the rectus femoris[1]. In that report, ESWT was administered in a total of three sessions at 7-d interval. The calcification was disintegrated in a month after ESWT and the pain was resolved completely at final 15-mo follow-up with complete resorption of calcific material in radiography. Calcific tendinopathy is usually a self-limiting condition. In light of this, improved pain after 15 mo can be caused by the natural course of pain, not by ESWT. In our case, ESWT was performed a total of six times. After six weeks of ESWT, calcium deposit showed almost no change in the radiography. However, calcium deposit was decreased and fragmented on ultrasonographic findings and her hip pain was completely resolved.

Conventional radiography is the technique used most frequently for the detection of calcifications in calcific tendinopathy. However, plain radiography can lead to misdiagnosis without the use of additional diagnostic tools because of the limitation of two-dimensional projections[8]. CT allows the best visualization and localization in calcific tendinopathy. It is rarely used for the assessment of non-traumatic joint[9].

If possible, MRI can be an useful tool to diagnosis calcific tendinopathy as it confirms the presence of inflammation associated with the acute symptomatic phase of calcific tendinopathy excluding other etiologies of pain[10]. Although these diagnostic tools could be used for additional examination, they are not appropriate as screening test because they are associated with high radiation and excessive cost. On the other hand, ultrasonography is useful for evaluating of calcific tendinopathy. Especially, the real-time nature of ultrasonography allows its use for both diagnostic and therapeutic purpose. In our patient, a huge calcific nodule disintegrated and showed reduction in size after ESWT. Even if it was not real-time, ESWT was exactly applied to the calcified nodule by marking the calcification with a pen under ultrasound guidance. As a feature of ultrasonography, high resolution shows the presence of deposits and defines their locations in the tendon, plus their size and texture. This technique enables staging of deposits by correlation of shadow cones. In the resting phase, deposits appear hyperechoic and arc shaped, whereas they appear non-arc shaped (fragmented/punctate and cystic) in the resolving phase. These appearances can also be correlated with symptomatic and asymptomatic phases of the disease. In our study, we founded that larger and more arc shaped calcification changed into smaller fragmented calcification after ESWT through ultrasonography.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, ultrasonography is a very good modality not only for diagnosing calcified tendinitis based on classical appearance, but also for evaluating the effect of ESWT during follow-up period.