Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Sep 26, 2025; 13(27): 108693
Published online Sep 26, 2025. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i27.108693
Disappearing intraesophageal foreign body: A case report
Hong-Wei Qiao, Yi-Fei Ye, Lin-Xi Nie, Gui-Zhi Du, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
Shuai Bai, Department of Gastroenterology, Endoscopy Center, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China
ORCID number: Gui-Zhi Du (0000-0001-5906-498X).
Author contributions: Qiao HW, Ye YF and Nie LX wrote the manuscript; Ye YF, Nie LX and Bai S curated the data; Du GZ supervised the study; All authors thoroughly reviewed and endorsed the final manuscript.
Informed consent statement: Written, informed consent was obtained from the patient’s legally entitled caregiver for publication of this report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Gui-Zhi Du, MD, PhD, Chief Physician, Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, No. 38 Guoxue Ave. Wuhou District, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan Province, China. duguizhi@scu.edu.cn
Received: April 21, 2025
Revised: May 22, 2025
Accepted: June 20, 2025
Published online: September 26, 2025
Processing time: 106 Days and 20.1 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Foreign body ingestion is a common emergency in clinical practice. While the majority of cases are resolved following successful removal, rare and unexpected complications can arise, such as the spontaneous displacement of a foreign body during the procedure. This report describes a unique case where a foreign body initially lodged in the esophagus was dropped during the procedure, leading to aspiration and migration to the airway.

CASE SUMMARY

A 69-year-old Chinese woman presented with a 6-hour history of throat pain and tightness after consuming rabbit meat. She had no fever or bloody stools but had a history of hypertension. Initial imaging, including a neck computed tomography scan, indicated a foreign body in the upper esophagus. Esophageal endoscopy was performed, during which the patient’s vital signs remained stable. The procedure showed a 14-cm mucosal erosion with food debris and a visible foreign body located in the gastric fundus. The foreign body was removed with forceps but unexpectedly dropped into the hypopharynx. Subsequent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy did not identify the foreign body. On awakening from anesthesia, the patient exhibited hypoxia and coarse breath sounds, but without coughing. A chest X-ray indicated that the foreign body had migrated into the airway. An emergency fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed, successfully retrieving the foreign body. The patient recovered without complications.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic removal of an esophageal foreign body can cause silent aspiration in elderly patients with absent cough reflexes, necessitating bedside imaging and prompt intervention.

Key Words: Esophageal foreign bodies; Endoscopic extraction; Asymptomatic aspiration; Fiberoptic bronchoscopy; Geriatric patients; Case report

Core Tip: This case report highlights the rare occurrence of aspiration during endoscopic foreign body removal, despite the absence of typical coughing reflexes. We emphasize the importance of bedside imaging for early detection of accidentally ingested foreign body and the role of emergency fiberoptic bronchoscopy in successful retrieval. These findings underscore the need for increased awareness and improved procedural strategies to prevent aspiration-related complications in high-risk patients.



INTRODUCTION

Foreign body ingestion is a frequent clinical emergency that often necessitates endoscopic intervention[1]. While the majority of cases are resolved following successful removal, rare and unexpected complications can arise, such as the spontaneous displacement of a foreign body during the procedure[2]. This report details a unique case in which a foreign body initially lodged in the esophagus was displaced during endoscopic removal, leading to aspiration and eventual migration into the airway. The foreign body was successfully retrieved using emergency fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Information from this case was organized into a timeline (Table 1). This case underscores the importance of understanding the risks associated with aspiration during endoscopic procedures, especially in older patients, where age-related attenuation of upper airway reflexes (particularly diminished cough responses) necessitates further mechanistic and clinical interventional studies[3,4].

Table 1 Clinical timeline of the patient.
Time
Event
Key findings
Pre-admissionRabbit meat ingestionInitiated FB event
AdmissionClinical evaluationBP 206/74 mmHg; Pharyngeal FB sensation
02:00 amCervical CT2.6 cm linear FB at C7-T2 with mural edema
11:00 amEGD under sedationMucosal erosion (14 cm); FB dislodged to hypopharynx
Intra-procedureVital signsSpO2 94%; ↓breath sounds (LLL)
Post-EGDChest X-rayLeft lower lobe atelectasis
Emergency phaseBronchoscopyFB retrieved from airway (8-minute GA)
24-hour post-opWard careRehydration, BP control, antibiotics
DischargeFollow-upStable condition; hypertension regimen adjusted
CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

A 69-year-old woman was admitted with the persistent sensation of a foreign body in her throat, along with throat pain and tightness over the past 6 hours.

History of present illness

The patient developed a persistent foreign body sensation in her throat, along with throat pain and tightness, six hours after consuming rabbit meat. She denied any additional symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, hematemesis, hemoptysis, or melena.

History of past illness

The patient had a history of hypertension, with fluctuating blood pressure measurements ranging from 180-210/70-90 mmHg, and had not been on regular treatment. She denied any history of diabetes mellitus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever, malaria, heart disease, cerebrovascular disease, or mental illness. There was no history of trauma or surgery, and she also denied any food or drug allergies.

Personal and family history

No special personal or family history was noted except a history of cesarean section under general anesthesia.

Physical examination

The patient’s vital signs were stable, with elevated blood pressure of 206/74 mmHg and oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry (SpO2) of 97%. Upon auscultation, symmetrical, coarse breath sounds were heard bilaterally.

Laboratory examinations

All blood test results were within normal limits.

Imaging examinations

Computed tomography (CT) of the neck showed a 2.6 cm × 0.7 cm strip-shaped hyperdensity in the upper esophagus (C7-T2), along with swelling of the surrounding esophageal wall, suggestive of a foreign body (Figure 1). Chest CT revealed scattered chronic inflammation in both lungs, with partial interstitial changes.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Computed tomography of the neck. Foreign bodies can be seen in the upper digestive tract (orange arrow).
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Esophageal foreign body and hypertension grade 3 (very high risk).

TREATMENT

The patient underwent esophageal endoscopy under deep sedation and analgesia induced by midazolam (1 mg), sufentanil (5 μg), and propofol (40 mg) (Figure 2). Her vital signs remained stable throughout the procedure. The examination revealed an esophageal mucosal erosion 14 cm from the incisors (Figure 2B), with food debris and a bone foreign body located in the gastric fundus (Figure 2D). No significant abnormalities were observed in the throat or inlet patch (Figure 2A and C). Using foreign body forceps, the object was successfully removed but unexpectedly dropped into the hypopharynx. During the procedure, the patient exhibited neither physical movement nor a choking sensation. She maintained spontaneous respiration with oxygen via a mask, with SpO2 fluctuating between 97% and 100%, blood pressure ranging from 110-130/60-75 mmHg, and heart rate between 60-70 bpm. However, after the foreign body disappeared, the patient’s SpO2 transiently dropped to 94%. On auscultation, rough breath sounds were heard bilaterally, with diminished breath sounds in the left lower lung. Shortly after awakening from anesthesia, the patient did not exhibit typical signs of aspiration, such as coughing or choking. The anesthesiologist suspected aspiration and ordered an emergency bedside chest X-ray, which displayed atelectasis of the left lower lobe, suggesting migration of the foreign body into the airway. An airway foreign body was suspected, prompting consultation with the fiberoptic bronchoscopy and emergency surgery teams. Given the patient's age and concerns for potential airway involvement, an emergency fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed under general anesthesia. The procedure lasted 8 min, the foreign body was successfully retrieved from the airway, and her vital signs remained stable.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Esophageal endoscopy at different sites in the patient. A: Esophageal endoscopy of the throat; B: Esophageal endoscopy 14 cm from the incisors, showing esophageal mucosal erosion; C: Esophageal endoscopy of the inlet patch; D: Esophageal endoscopy of food debris and a foreign body bone lodged in the esophagus.
OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Postoperatively, the patient was transferred to the emergency ward, where she received rehydration, blood pressure management, and anti-infective therapy. Her vital signs remained stable throughout these interventions, and no complications occurred. The patient was discharged the following day in a stable condition, with instructions for follow-up care.

DISCUSSION

Foreign body ingestion and food impactions are common clinical emergencies. While most cases resolve spontaneously, approximately 10%-20% of cases require intervention[1]. While smooth-edged foreign bodies typically do not pose significant issues, sharp-edged ones can lead to serious complications. The most common symptoms include dysphagia, odynophagia, retrosternal pain, throat pain, sensation of a foreign body, retching, vomiting, choking, and hypersalivation. Endoscopy is a reliable and well-established method for removing various types of upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies, with careful pre-procedure evaluation of the foreign body size, shape, location, and its relationship to adjacent structures being essential for optimal management[5-7]. In the present case, dislodgement of the foreign body occurred during gastroscopic clamping, influenced by several contributing factors: First, the foreign body was a sharp bone fragment, a cervical CT scan demonstrated its initial lodgment in the proximal esophagus 14 cm from the incisors. Subsequent endoscopic evaluation revealed migration of the object to the gastric fundus. The fragment exhibited a surface coating with adherent debris and gastric secretions, making it smooth and more prone to dislodgement. Second, the narrow and angular lumen of the pharynx created increased friction against the sharp edges of the bone, facilitating its displacement. Finally, the angle at which the foreign body was clamped might not have aligned with the direction of the gastroscope's travel, which could also have contributed to its dislodgement. These factors underscore the complexities of foreign body retrieval and the critical importance of using a careful technique during endoscopic procedures. Aspiration is defined as the introduction of oropharyngeal or gastric contents into the lower respiratory tract. While coughing is the most common reflex, it is not always observed after aspiration[8,9]. Notably, the absence of coughing during endoscopy does not exclude aspiration. In the present case, aspiration occurred without the typical signs of coughing or choking. The use of propofol and sufentanil during sedation is known to suppress protective airway reflexes, increasing the risk of aspiration, particularly in older patients who may have diminished airway reflex sensitivity[3,10]. Advanced age has been associated with a decline in the integrity of physical barriers and the immune system's ability to defend against pathogens, which may also reduce the sensitivity of airway reflexes[3,4]. With advances in respiratory endoscopy, most aspirated foreign bodies can be effectively removed using fiberoptic bronchoscopy, emphasizing the importance of understanding factors that contribute to aspiration, especially in sedated or elderly patients[11-13]. To improve patient outcome, it is crucial to shorten the interval between diagnosis and intervention. In the present case, close monitoring of respiratory status, including SpO2 levels and pulmonary auscultation, proved useful. When aspiration was suspected, a bedside chest X-ray was performed, revealing atelectasis in the left lower lobe and suggesting migration of the foreign body into the airway. Early identification of such complications enables faster intervention and minimizes potential damage. Additionally, bedside lung ultrasound can be a valuable tool in diagnosing aspiration, as it can detect early changes such as atelectasis or consolidation, which may not yet be visible on a chest X-ray examination[14]. In fact, this non-invasive technique aids in confirming the diagnosis and guiding further management, especially in emergency situations where time is critical.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the complexities of foreign body ingestion and the potential for unexpected complications during endoscopic treatment, such as displacement and aspiration. The absence of typical signs, such as coughing, does not rule out aspiration, especially under deep sedation and analgesia. Older patients, with reduced airway reflex sensitivity, are at higher risk of aspiration. Timely interventions, including bedside imaging, play a critical role in diagnosing and managing complications. Early identification of aspiration can facilitate prompt treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country of origin: China

Peer-review report’s classification

Scientific Quality: Grade A, Grade A

Novelty: Grade A, Grade A

Creativity or Innovation: Grade A, Grade A

Scientific Significance: Grade A, Grade B

P-Reviewer: Mondal K S-Editor: Liu H L-Editor: A P-Editor: Wang WB

References
1.  Geng C, Li X, Luo R, Cai L, Lei X, Wang C. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: a retrospective study of 1294 cases. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:1286-1291.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 39]  [Cited by in RCA: 55]  [Article Influence: 6.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Cha MH, Sandooja R, Khalid S, Lao N, Lim J, Razik R. Complication rates in emergent endoscopy for foreign bodies under different sedation modalities: A large single-center retrospective review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2021;13:45-55.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 6]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Erskine RJ, Murphy PJ, Langton JA, Smith G. Effect of age on the sensitivity of upper airway reflexes. Br J Anaesth. 1993;70:574-575.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 53]  [Cited by in RCA: 44]  [Article Influence: 1.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Ebihara S, Ebihara T, Kohzuki M. Effect of aging on cough and swallowing reflexes: implications for preventing aspiration pneumonia. Lung. 2012;190:29-33.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 62]  [Cited by in RCA: 67]  [Article Influence: 4.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Pokharel R, Adhikari P, Bhusal CL, Guragain RP. Oesophageal foreign bodies in children. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2008;47:186-188.  [PubMed]  [DOI]
6.  Zhao XJ, Yu D K, Wang H H, Li A Q, Wang X, Xie H, Cheng Z M, Sheng J Q. [The experience of endoscopic removal foreign bodies in upper digestive tract]. Weichangbingxue He Ganbingxue Zazhi. 2011;20:829-830.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]
7.  Zhang S, Cui Y, Gong X, Gu F, Chen M, Zhong B. Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract in South China: a retrospective study of 561 cases. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55:1305-1312.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 79]  [Cited by in RCA: 78]  [Article Influence: 5.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  Limper AH, Prakash UB. Tracheobronchial foreign bodies in adults. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:604-609.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 255]  [Cited by in RCA: 232]  [Article Influence: 6.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Boyd M, Watkins F, Singh S, Haponik E, Chatterjee A, Conforti J, Chin R Jr. Prevalence of flexible bronchoscopic removal of foreign bodies in the advanced elderly. Age Ageing. 2009;38:396-400.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 10]  [Cited by in RCA: 15]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Tagaito Y, Isono S, Nishino T. Upper airway reflexes during a combination of propofol and fentanyl anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1998;88:1459-1466.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 125]  [Cited by in RCA: 116]  [Article Influence: 4.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Hayashi H, Abe A, Ota M, Momokita M, Ishihama T, Furuta H, Taniguchi T, Takeuchi K. Endoscopic removal of accidental aspirated and ingested dental foreign bodies: A cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100:e27602.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Hajjar WM, Aljurayyad RS, Al-Jameel NI, Shaheen IS, Al-Nassar SA. Unusual case of inhaled metallic dental bur during dental procedure in a healthy adult. Saudi J Anaesth. 2016;10:465-467.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Full Text (PDF)]  [Cited by in Crossref: 3]  [Cited by in RCA: 4]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Leuzzi G, Kawamukai K, Lacava N. An unusual foreign body after dental filling. Lung. 2013;191:677-678.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in RCA: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Aydin O, Birbilen AZ, User IR, Turer OB, Teksam O. Lung ultrasound findings in children with foreign body aspiration. J Clin Ultrasound. 2023;51:447-451.  [RCA]  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Full Text]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in RCA: 3]  [Article Influence: 1.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]