Case Report Open Access
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Oct 16, 2023; 11(29): 7214-7220
Published online Oct 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i29.7214
Aggressive angiomyxoma of the epididymis: A case report
Xu-Jie Liu, Jia-Hao Su, Qi-Zhong Fu, Ying Liu, Department of Urology Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, China
ORCID number: Xu-Jie Liu (0009-0009-4688-0334); Ying Liu (0000-0002-7874-9199).
Author contributions: Liu XJ and Su JH contributed equally to this manuscript and can be regarded as co-first authors; Liu XJ and Fu QZ performed the surgery, analysed and collected the data; Liu XJ and Su JH wrote the paper and the study concept and design; Liu Y performed the linguistic review; Liu Y critically reviewed the manuscript; Fu QZ performed the histological analyses, analysed and interpreted the imaging findings; and all the authors provided final approval for the version to be final approval of the submitted version.
Informed consent statement: Ethics approval and consent to participate. This case report was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this clinical case report. Consent for publication written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
CARE Checklist (2016) statement: The authors have read the CARE Checklist (2016), and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the CARE Checklist (2016).
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Ying Liu, PhD, Professor, Department of Urology Surgery, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, No. 6 Jiefang Street, Dalian 116001, Liaoning Province, China. lypl197379@163.com
Received: August 1, 2023
Peer-review started: August 1, 2023
First decision: August 31, 2023
Revised: September 5, 2023
Accepted: September 18, 2023
Article in press: September 18, 2023
Published online: October 16, 2023
Processing time: 73 Days and 1.2 Hours

Abstract
BACKGROUND

Aggressive angiomyolipoma is an extremely rare benign mesenchymal tumor that was originally described as a locally recurrent mucinous spindle cell tumour. Aggressive angiomyolipoma originates from myofibroblasts, vascular smooth muscle cells, or fibroblasts, and displays various phenotypes of myofibroblasts and abnormal muscle arteries. Aggressive angiomyolipoma was first identified in 1983 and fewer than 50 male patients have been reported to date. It is an extremely rare mesenchymal tumour and often confused with other diseases. Patients with epididymal aggressive angiomyolipoma lack typical symptoms, most of which occur incidentally, although some patients may experience mild pain, discomfort, and swelling. Pain may be exacerbated by pressure from the mass.

CASE SUMMARY

A 66-year-old male was admitted to the hospital on January 14, 2022 with chief complaint of swelling in the left scrotum for one year. There was no apparent cause for the swelling. The patient did not consult with any doctor or receive any treatment for the swelling. The enlarged scrotum increased in size gradually until it reached approximately the size of a goose egg, and was accompanied by discomfort and swelling of the left cavity of the scrotum. The patient had no history of any testicular trauma, infection, or urinary tract infection. The patient urinated freely, 1-2 times at night, without urgency, dysuria (painful urination), or haematuria. There was no significant family history of malignancy. The patient underwent excision of the enlarged tumour and the left epididymis under general anaesthesia on January 18, 2022. Twelve months of follow-up revealed no recurrence. The patient was satisfied with the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive angiomyolipoma is extremely rare clinically and often confused with other diseases. The pathogenesis of aggressive angiomyolipoma is unclear and the clinical presentation is mostly a painless enlarged mass. The diagnosis of aggressive angiomyolipoma requires a combination of medical history, preoperative imaging such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, cytological examination and preoperative and postoperative pathological biopsy. The preferred treatment is surgery, with the possibility of a new alternative treatment option after hormonal therapy. Aggressive angiomyolipoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of parametrial tumors of the male genital area that present as clinically significant masses. The high recurrence rate of aggressive angiomyolipoma may be related to incomplete tumor resection, and patients with aggressive angiomyolipoma are advised to undergo annual postoperative follow-up and imaging for recurrence.

Key Words: Aggressive angiomyxoma; Mesenchymal tumor; Scrotal mass; Epididymal malignancy; Orchiectomy; Male reproductive system neoplasms; Case report

Core Tip: Aggressive angiomyolipoma is an extremely rare benign mesenchymal tumor originally described as a locally recurrent mucinous spindle cell tumor. Aggressive angiomyolipoma was first identified in 1983 and fewer than 50 male patients have been reported to date. Aggressive angiomyolipomas in the scrotum are often misdiagnosed on physical examination and resemble other urological disorders such as testicular tumors, varicoceles, and inguinal hernias. Surgery is the preferred treatment option, and there may be new alternatives after hormone therapy. Aggressive angiomyolipoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of a parametrial tumor of the male genital region presenting as a clinically significant mass.



INTRODUCTION

Aggressive angiomyxoma is a benign mesenchymal tumour that was originally described as a locally recurrent mucinous spindle cell tumour originating mainly in the soft tissues of the pelvic region of premenopausal women[1]. The mean age of onset of aggressive angiomyolipoma in male patients is approximately 46 years (range: 1-82 years)[2]. Aggressive angiomyolipoma was first identified in 1983 and fewer than 50 male patients have been reported to date[3]. Of these, 38%, 33%, 13%, 8%, and 8% of the cases involved the scrotum, spermatic cord, perineum, pelvic organs, and bladder, respectively[4].

Intrascrotal aggressive angiomyolipoma is frequently misdiagnosed on physical examination, similar to other urological conditions, such as testicular tumours, varicocele, and inguinal hernia. Patients with epididymal aggressive angiomyolipoma lack typical symptoms, most of which occur incidentally, although some patients may experience mild pain, discomfort, and swelling. Pain may be aggravated by mass pressure. Aggressive angiomyolipomas grow rapidly in an infiltrative manner with poorly defined borders, vary in size, and often adhere to the testis. When a tumour infiltrates the spermatic cord, symptoms of spermatic cord thickening may be observed. Furthermore, scrotal ultrasonography reveals only hypoechoic or cystic masses with vascularity, making it difficult to distinguish aggressive angiomyolipoma from other mesenchymal tumours.

CASE PRESENTATION
Chief complaints

The patient, male, 66 years old, was admitted to the hospital with a left scrotal mass that had been there for one year.

History of present illness

A 66-year-old male was admitted to the hospital on January 14, 2022 presenting with a year-long finding of left scrotal swelling with no apparent cause. The swelling was approximately the size of an egg, without any discomfort. Later, the scrotal swelling increased gradually and was approximately the size of a goose egg, accompanied by discomfort in the left cavity of the scrotum. The patient had no history of testicular trauma, sexually transmitted diseases, urinary tract infection, undescended testes, or groin/scrotal surgery.

History of past illness

The patient had no pertinent past illness history.

Personal and family history

The patient had no pertinent personal or family history.

Physical examination

On physical examination, the vital signs were as follows: Body temperature, 36.2 °C; blood pressure, 140/80 mmHg; heart rate, 64 beats/min; respiratory rate, 20 breaths/min. The penis was of the adult type. There was a solid and tough swelling (size: Approximately 12.0 cm × 9.0 cm) in the left cavity of the scrotum. The left testicle and epididymis were not palpable, whereas the right testicle and epididymis were not nodular and painful to palpation.

Laboratory examinations

The following blood tests were performed: Liver function, renal function, serum electrolytes, thyroid function, coagulopathy, markers of myocardial injury, syphilis, human immunodeficiency virus, glycosylated hemoglobin, lipids, rheumatoid factor, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, immune panel, and tumor markers. All laboratory values were within reference ranges.

Imaging examinations

Computed tomography (CT, Philis EPIQ5, United States) showed a cystic lesion in the left scrotum measuring approximately 6.6 cm × 5.5 cm (Figure 1A). Colour Doppler ultrasonography (SOMATOM Definition Flash, Siemens, Germany) revealed a hypoechoic mass in the left scrotum (Figure 1B). Further imaging examinations, including whole-abdomen CT and bone scans, did not reveal lymph node enlargement or distant tumour metastasis. The tumour markers lactate dehydrogenase, β-human chorionic gonadotropin, α-fetoprotein, and carcinoembryonic antigen were at normal levels.

Figure 1
Figure 1 Computed tomography and colour Doppler ultrasonography (testes, epididymis and spermatic cord). A: The computed tomography showed a cystic lesion in the left scrotum measuring about 6.6 cm × 5.5 cm with clear borders (orange arrow), and the left testicle was normal in size (white arrow); B: Ultrasound showed that the left testicle size was 4.3 cm × 2.8 cm × 2.6 cm (white arrow). On the left side of the scrotum there was a well-defined hypoechoic mass (orange arrow) with regular morphology and heterogeneous internal echogenicity.
FINAL DIAGNOSIS

Postoperative pathology revealed a mesenchymal tumour that was mucinous in origin. Microscopic examination revealed various tumour cell morphologies, including round or ovoid nuclei, deep staining, eosinophilic cytoplasm, tennis racket-like or spider-like tumour cells, and a variable number of multinucleated giant cells with deep-stained nuclei and lax interstitium. Immunohistochemical results revealed the tumor cells were positive for vimentin, desmin, CD68 (individual cells), CD31 (vascular), P53 (individual cells), while negative for S-100, SMA, Bcl-2. The Ki-67 index was less than 10%. Combined hematoxylin-eosin staining (HE) and immunophenotype analyses indicated mucinous spindle cell tumour-aggressive angiomucinous tumours (Figures 2A and B). Twelve months of follow-up revealed no recurrence. The patient was satisfied with the treatment.

Figure 2
Figure 2 Micropathological image of an epididymal mucocele in this case. A: Dilated, thick-walled, hyalinised blood vessels of variable size are seen microscopically (orange arrow); B: Clostridial and astrocytic tumour cells (orange arrow) were scattered in the mucus stroma with no evident heterogeneity. Original magnification of × 200.
TREATMENT

The patient underwent excision of the enlarged tumour and the left epididymis under general anaesthesia on January 18, 2022.

OUTCOME AND FOLLOW-UP

Intraoperatively, adhesions were found between the inner and outer fascia of the spermatic cord and the sheath layer, and the testis was observed to be atrophied when the sheath was incised. The head and body of the epididymis were normal in shape, and a mass measuring approximately 10 cm with a heterogeneous texture at the tail of the epididymis was observed. The size of the left paratesticular mass was approximately 70 mm × 70 mm × 60 mm (Figure 3A), with an envelope and a greyish-red, greyish-yellow, translucent cut surface (Figure 3B), and the spermatic cord. The swelling was 17 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm, with greyish white cut surface and medium texture.

Figure 3
Figure 3 Gross pathological picture of this case of epididymal mucinous neoplasm. A: The visible mass is an enveloped, white, grey, well-confined solid tumour (7.0 cm × 6.0 cm); B: A gel-like cut of the mass can be seen (orange arrow).

Two oval-shaped masses along the edges of the scrotal and epididymal masses and the white membrane of the testis were removed gradually. Swelling below the testes was selected for intraoperative freezing. Postoperative pathology revealed a mesenchymal tumour that was mucinous in origin. Microscopic examination revealed various tumour cell morphologies, including round or ovoid nuclei, deep staining, eosinophilic cytoplasm, tennis racket-like or spider-like tumour cells, and a variable number of multinucleated giant cells with deep-stained nuclei and lax interstitium. Immunohistochemical results revealed the tumor cells were positive for vimentin, desmin, CD68 (individual cells), CD31 (vascular), P53 (individual cells), while negative for S-100, SMA, Bcl-2. The Ki-67 index was less than 10%. Combined HE and immunophenotype analyses indicated mucinous spindle cell tumour-aggressive angiomucinous tumours (Figures 2A and B). Twelve months of follow-up revealed no recurrence. The patient was satisfied with the treatment.

DISCUSSION

Aggressive angiomyolipoma is an extremely rare mesenchymal tumor, and most patients are women of childbearing age. To date, fewer than 50 cases of aggressive angiomyolipoma have been reported worldwide in men, of which 38%, 33%, 13%, 8%, and 8% are from the scrotum, spermatic cord, perineum, pelvic organs, and bladder, respectively. However, the pathogenesis of aggressive angiomyolipoma is unknown. Intrascrotal aggressive angiomyolipoma is frequently misdiagnosed on physical examination as other urological disorders, such as testicular tumours, varicocele, and inguinal hernia, and has certain characteristic presentations on CT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and other imaging studies[2]. On CT, the tumour shows well-defined borders and no muscle-like tapering. MRI and CT angiography are the most effective radiological methods for diagnosing aggressive angiomyolipoma, and T2-weighted MRI reveals tumours with high signal intensity. These manifestations may be related to the sparse mucinous-like stroma and high water content of vascular mucinous tumours[5]. The distinctive “swirling” appearance of the fibromuscular layer can also be detected after contrast injection. A spiral or layered internal structure of the tumour is observed in most patients, which is a typical MRI feature of aggressive angiomyolipoma (a swirling chain aligned with the cranioventral axis). Additionally, CT and MRI can accurately show the extension of these tumours over the pelvic diaphragm, which is valuable in determining the surgical pathway.

Aggressive angiomyolipoma exhibits certain characteristic manifestations on CT, MRI, and other imaging modalities. On CT, the boundaries of the tumour are clear, and there is no muscle-like gradual decay-like appearance. MRI and CT with contrast are the most effective radiological methods for diagnosing aggressive angiomyolipoma, and T2-weighted MRI reveals tumours with a high signal intensity. These manifestations may be related to the sparse mucinous-like stroma and high water content of vascular mucinous tumours[6]. The distinctive “swirling” appearance of the fibromuscular stroma can also be detected after contrast injection. The internal structure of the tumour is spiral or layered in most patients, which is a typical MRI feature of aggressive angiomyolipoma: A swirling chain aligned with the craniocaudal axis. CT and MRI can also accurately demonstrate the extension of these tumours over the pelvic diaphragm, which can be valuable for determining the surgical pathway.

There are no specific tumour markers for aggressive angiomyolipoma. The thick-walled vessels are the main microscopic features of aggressive angiomyolipoma, compared to those of other connective tissue tumours[7]. Immunohistochemical studies showed strong positivity for vimentin, smooth muscle actin, and CD34 in the spindle and stellate tumour cells in all cases. Stromal cells were positive for waveform proteins and tumour cells were mostly negative for factor VIII-associated antigen, carcinoembryonic antigen, and cytokeratin[7]. Some patients with aggressive angiomyolipoma are positive for desmin, estrogen receptors (ERs), and progesterone receptors (PRs), whereas all patients are negative for S-100[2]. In contrast, the significance of the immunohistochemical markers murine double minute 2 (MDM2) and cell cycle protein-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) is uncertain; MDM2 and CDK4 genes are located on either side of the 12q13-15 region, spanning the HMGA2 locus, and has been suggested to be associated with mutations in chromosomal region 12q13-15[2,8]. 12q13-15, the most common gene in aggressive angiomyolipoma, is a region that is rearranged in several mesenchymal tumours[8]. CDK4 amplification may also contribute to cell cycle progression. Highly proliferative cell nuclear antigens and a lack of p21 protein expression may be associated with an increased propensity for relapse[9].

Aggressive angiomyolipoma diagnosis requires a combination of history, preoperative imaging (such as CT and MRI), cytology, and preoperative and postoperative pathological biopsies. Several other entities in the differential diagnosis of aggressive angiomyolipoma also have a myofibroblastic origin with similar immunohistochemical features[1,5,10].

Surgical resection is the first-line of treatment for aggressive angiomyolipoma[4,6,8]. The high recurrence rate of aggressive angiomyolipoma is likely related to incomplete tumour resection[11]. Therefore, it is important to determine whether a tumour is primary or metastatic before surgery. Generally, aggressive angiomucinous tumours do not metastasise distally. To date, no metastatic tumours have been reported in men, whereas cases of metastasis have been reported in women. The first metastasis of aggressive angiomyolipoma usually occurs in the pelvis, followed by extensive dissemination in the lung, mediastinal, iliac, and aortic lymph nodes with peritoneal dissemination, and the patient eventually dies due to multiple organ failure[12]. Therefore, annual postoperative follow-ups and imaging for recurrence are recommended in patients with aggressive angiomyolipoma[13]. Radiotherapy can be used as a hormonal therapy or to control multiple recurrences after surgical resection with poor results[14]. Furthermore, radiotherapy is ineffective in the treatment of aggressive angiomyolipoma because of the slow progression of the disease[15]. Hormonal therapies, such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) (goserelin), or other antiestrogen drugs (tamoxifen) are novel alternatives to pharmacotherapy[16-19]. The localization and growth of aggressive angiomyolipoma are limited to the genital region and may be associated with sex hormones, especially oestrogen in women and androgens in men. Relevant studies have suggested that the growth of aggressive angiomucinous tumours in men may be associated with androgens, whereas the tumour tissues of female patients are usually strongly positive for ER and PR and those in men are usually negative for ER and PR staining[1]. A 37-year-old woman with aggressive angiomyolipomas was reported. Immunohistochemistry showed ER and PR positive. She received GnRH-a drug for 6 courses and was followed up for 3 years without recurrence[20]. However, long-term treatment with GnRH agonists may induce some side effects, such as osteoporosis and depression, so the optimal treatment regimen for GnRH agonists needs further study.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive angiomyolipomas of the epididymis are rare and often misdiagnosed. Their pathogenesis is unclear, and clinical presentation in most cases is a painless, enlarged mass. Aggressive angiomyolipoma diagnosis requires a combination of medical history, preoperative imaging (such as CT and MRI), cytological examination, and preoperative and postoperative pathological biopsy. Surgery is the preferred treatment option, with the possibility of a new alternative after hormonal therapy. Aggressive angiomyolipoma should be considered in the differential diagnosis of parametrial tumours of male genital area that present as clinically significant masses.

Footnotes

Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.

Peer-review model: Single blind

Specialty type: Medicine, research and experimental

Country/Territory of origin: China

Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification

Grade A (Excellent): 0

Grade B (Very good): 0

Grade C (Good): C

Grade D (Fair): 0

Grade E (Poor): 0

P-Reviewer: Exbrayat JM, France S-Editor: Wang JJ L-Editor: A P-Editor: Wang JJ

References
1.  Chihara Y, Fujimoto K, Takada S, Hirayama A, Cho M, Yoshida K, Ozono S, Hirao Y. Aggressive angiomyxoma in the scrotum expressing androgen and progesterone receptors. Int J Urol. 2003;10:672-675.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 35]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 35]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
2.  Karwacki GM, Stöckli M, Kettelhack C, Mengiardi B, Studler U. Radiographic diagnosis and differentiation of an aggressive angiomyxoma in a male patient. J Radiol Case Rep. 2013;7:1-6.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
3.  Kidric DM, MacLennan GT. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the male genital region. J Urol. 2008;180:1506.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 5]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 5]  [Article Influence: 0.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
4.  Morag R, Fridman E, Mor Y. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the scrotum mimicking huge hydrocele: case report and literature review. Case Rep Med. 2009;2009:157624.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 12]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 19]  [Article Influence: 1.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
5.  Zhao CY, Su N, Jiang YX, Yang M. Application of ultrasound in aggressive angiomyxoma: Eight case reports and review of literature. World J Clin Cases. 2018;6:811-819.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in CrossRef: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 11]  [Article Influence: 1.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
6.  Draeger DL, Protzel C, Hakenberg OW. Aggressive Angiomyxoma as a Rare Differential Diagnosis of Enlargement of the Scrotum. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2016;14:e237-e239.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.9]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
7.  Sakata K, Ishikawa S, Tokue A, Hirota N. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the scrotum. Urol Int. 1997;58:247-249.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 14]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 14]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
8.  van Roggen JF, van Unnik JA, Briaire-de Bruijn IH, Hogendoorn PC. Aggressive angiomyxoma: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 11 cases with long-term follow-up. Virchows Arch. 2005;446:157-163.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 51]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 43]  [Article Influence: 2.2]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
9.  Carlinfante G, De Marco L, Mori M, Ferretti S, Crafa P. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the spermatic cord. Two unusual cases occurring in childhood. Pathol Res Pract. 2001;197:139-144.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 21]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 22]  [Article Influence: 1.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
10.  Idrees MT, Hoch BL, Wang BY, Unger PD. Aggressive angiomyxoma of male genital region. Report of 4 cases with immunohistochemical evaluation including hormone receptor status. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2006;10:197-204.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 50]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44]  [Article Influence: 2.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
11.  Bégin LR, Clement PB, Kirk ME, Jothy S, McCaughey WT, Ferenczy A. Aggressive angiomyxoma of pelvic soft parts: a clinicopathologic study of nine cases. Hum Pathol. 1985;16:621-628.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 159]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 132]  [Article Influence: 3.4]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
12.  Blandamura S, Cruz J, Faure Vergara L, Machado Puerto I, Ninfo V. Aggressive angiomyxoma: a second case of metastasis with patient's death. Hum Pathol. 2003;34:1072-1074.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 132]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 118]  [Article Influence: 5.6]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
13.  Rao KS, Rao KA, Praveen S. Aggressive angiomyxoma of scrotum presenting as scrotal lymphedema in a case of postoperative carcinoma penis. Indian J Surg. 2015;77:170-171.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 6]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 7]  [Article Influence: 0.8]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
14.  Bhandari RN, Dragun AE, Aguero EG, Sharma AK. External beam radiotherapy for perirectal angiomyxoma results in a dramatic clinical response and allows a patient to avoid abdominoperineal resection. Am J Clin Oncol. 2006;29:318-319.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 9]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 9]  [Article Influence: 0.5]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
15.  Kirkilessis G, Kakavia K, Bougiouklis D, Papadopoulos A, Lampropoulos C, Kirkilessis I. Aggressive angiomyxoma to 57-year old man. J Surg Case Rep. 2020;2020:rjaa313.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 4]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 8]  [Article Influence: 2.0]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
16.  McCluggage WG, Patterson A, Maxwell P. Aggressive angiomyxoma of pelvic parts exhibits oestrogen and progesterone receptor positivity. J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:603-605.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 75]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 65]  [Article Influence: 2.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
17.  Zhang P, Song K, Li L, Geng F, Li J, Dong R, Zhang T, Kong B. Aggressive Angiomyxoma with massive ascites. Gynecol Oncol Case Rep. 2011;1:12-13.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 1]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1]  [Article Influence: 0.1]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
18.  Shinohara N, Nonomura K, Ishikawa S, Seki H, Koyanagi T. Medical management of recurrent aggressive angiomyxoma with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Int J Urol. 2004;11:432-435.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 45]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 46]  [Article Influence: 2.3]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
19.  McCluggage WG, Jamieson T, Dobbs SP, Grey A. Aggressive angiomyxoma of the vulva: Dramatic response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:623-625.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]  [Cited by in Crossref: 82]  [Cited by in F6Publishing: 67]  [Article Influence: 3.7]  [Reference Citation Analysis (0)]
20.  Lin C, Huang F, Li F, Zhu X, Jiang X, Tie L, Shen G, Cheng J. Clinicopathologic and treatment features of aggressive angiomyxoma: a case report. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2019;12:1816-1819.  [PubMed]  [DOI]  [Cited in This Article: ]