Published online Aug 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i23.5447
Peer-review started: May 24, 2023
First decision: June 12, 2023
Revised: June 15, 2023
Accepted: July 18, 2023
Article in press: July 18, 2023
Published online: August 16, 2023
Processing time: 84 Days and 5.7 Hours
Endometrial cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed gynecological cancers worldwide, and early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer has a poor prognosis. Adjuvant treatments after surgery, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, have been widely used in clinical practice to improve patient survival. Medroxyprogesterone acetate is a synthetic progestogen that has been reported to have potential anticancer effects in endometrial cancer. However, its efficacy, safety, and long-term prognostic benefits as an adjuvant treatment for endometrial cancer remain controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to observe the efficacy and prognostic impact of adjuvant medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment in patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer and evaluate its safety.
To observe the efficacy and prognosis of adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer with medroxyprogesterone acetate and to evaluate its safety.
We collected the clinical data of 200 patients with early-stage high-risk endo
According to the Cox regression analysis, age [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.636, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.411-15.237], pathological type (HR = 6.943, 95%CI: 2.299-20.977), molecular typing (HR = 5.789, 95%CI: 3.305-10.141), and myometrial infiltration (HR = 5.768, 95%CI: 1.898-17.520) were factors influencing the prognosis of patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer.
Age, pathological type, molecular typing, and myometrial infiltration were all relevant factors affecting the prognosis of early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer. The potential long-term prognostic benefit of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy in patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer is worthy of clinical consideration.
Core Tip: Adjuvant treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate may have potential long-term prognostic benefits for patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer. Age, pathological type, molecular typing, and myometrial infiltration were identified as relevant factors affecting patient prognosis.
- Citation: Wang DR. Efficacy and prognosis of adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer with medroxyprogesterone acetate COX regression analysis. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(23): 5447-5454
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i23/5447.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i23.5447
Patients with endometrial cancer develop clinical symptoms early. Although the prognosis of patients with early adjuvant postoperative treatment is generally good, patients who are not treated promptly may continue to develop postoperative recurrence or metastasis, which is associated with a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate. Therefore, these patients require adjuvant postoperative treatment depending on their pathology[1-5]. The present study suggests that there are other factors associated with adjuvant postoperative treatment that highly influence patient prognosis, but whether they are independent risk factors remains uncertain[6-10].
Progestins include natural, synthetic, and semi-synthetic progestins that effectively prevent abnormal endometrial hyperplasia caused by single estrogen stimulation. These progestins exert a protective effect on the endometrium[11-14]. The structure of progestins is similar to that of natural progesterone. Progestins act on the pituitary-gonadal axis to regulate gonadotropin secretion and reduce the levels of the luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. In addition, medroxyprogesterone acetate acts directly on the endometrium to inhibit its persistent hyperplasia and induce its shrinkage, thereby reducing endometrial thickness[15-25]. We here investigated the clinical value of postoperative adjuvant treatment with medroxyprogesterone acetate through a prognostic analysis of endometrial cancer patients. Moreover, the independent risk factors affecting patient prognosis were determined to provide clinical guidance for endometrial cancer treatment.
We collected the clinical data of 200 patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer who were admitted to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022.
We included the data of patients with complete surgical pathological staging, those diagnosed with endometrial cancer on the basis of surgical pathology, all of those who were followed up, and those for whom complete clinicopathological data were available. Data of patients treated first with non-surgical treatment (e.g., preoperative chemotherapy), who died postoperatively because of severe comorbidities, and who postoperatively developed other malignant tumors were excluded.
Conventional surgery was performed in the control group (100 cases), while adjuvant treatment with 4 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate tablets (Shanghai Xinyi Tianping Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., State Pharmacopoeia H31020976) was administered to the study group (100 cases) once daily for 3 mo. The tablets were swallowed with warm water.
Statistical analysis was completed using SPSS 23.0. The statistical data were described as relative numbers. The survival analysis was conducted by plotting Kaplan-Meier curves. The parallel log-rank test was conducted for factors that affected survival, as indicated in a one-way test. The multiple factors affecting survival were analyzed using the Cox regression model analysis and evaluated by hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The test-level α was 0.05 (two-tailed).
The cumulative survival rates of endometrial cancer patients with or without pregnancy history, or combined polycystic ovary syndrome, hypertension, and obesity exhibited no statistical significance, all P > 0.05. The cumulative survival rates of patients aged < 50 years and with non-menopausal endometrial cancer were higher than those of patients aged ≥ 50 years and with menopausal endometrial cancer, all P < 0.05 (Table 1).
Clinical features | n | Cumulative survival rate (%) | χ2 value | P value |
Age (yr) | ||||
< 50 | 84 | 97.4 | 5.897 | 0.002 |
≥ 50 | 116 | 81.5 | ||
Non-menopausal | 81 | 96.8 | 6.793 | 0.008 |
Menopausal | 119 | 87.5 | ||
Pregnancy history | ||||
Yes | 155 | 90.4 | 0.634 | 0.269 |
None | 45 | 100.0 | ||
Comorbidities | ||||
Polycystic ovary syndrome | ||||
Yes | 33 | 100.0 | 0.310 | 0.454 |
None | 168 | 90.6 | ||
High blood pressure | ||||
Yes | 81 | 88.1 | 0.600 | 0.358 |
None | 119 | 92.1 | ||
Obesity | ||||
Post-operative adjuvant radiotherapy | 79 | 85.7 | 1.062 | 0.280 |
121 | 92.1 | |||
Post-operative medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment | 72 | 85.7 | 0.673 | 0.195 |
128 | 80.0 | |||
Co-Medroxyprogesterone Acetate | 61 | 96.6 | 4.552 | 0.047 |
Not combined with medroxyprogesterone acetate | 139 | 81.0 | ||
Type of pathology | ||||
Adenocarcinoma | 144 | 95.6 | ||
Adenosquamous carcinoma | 10 | 37.5 | 32.321 | < 0.001 |
Non-adenocarcinoma Typing | 7 | 77.8 |
The cumulative survival rate of patients with endometrial cancer with or without postoperative adjuvant therapy exhibited no statistical significance, P > 0.05. The cumulative survival rate of patients treated with medroxyprogesterone acetate after surgery was higher than that of those treated without medroxyprogesterone acetate, P < 0.05 (Table 1).
The cumulative survival rates of patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer of different stages, pathological stages, and histological grades exhibited no statistical significance, all P > 0.05. The cumulative survival rates of patients with the molecular staging of high-copy type, with choroidal infiltration, N3 grade lymph node metastasis, and myometrial infiltration ≥ 1/2 were lower than those of patients with other molecular stagings, without choroidal infiltration, N0-N2 grade lymph node metastasis, and myometrial infiltration < 1/2. The differences were statistically significant, all at P < 0.05 (Table 1).
Univariate variables were included in the multifactor Cox independent regression analysis for assignment (Table 2). The analysis revealed that age, type of pathology, molecular typing, and myometrial infiltration were factors influencing the prognosis of patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer, all at P < 0.05 (Table 3).
Factors | Assignment |
Age | < 50 yr = 0, ≥ 50 yr = 1 |
Menopause | Not menopausal = 0, Menopausal = 1 |
Factors | Assignment |
Lymph node metastasis | N0 = 0, N1 = 1, N2 = 2, N3 = 3 |
Myofilament infiltration | < 1/2 = 0, ≥ 1/2 = 1 |
Endometrial cancer is among the most common malignant tumors of the reproductive system. It poses a severe threat to women’s health, and the number of endometrial cancer cases is increasing every year[26-30]. The mechanism underlying endometrial cancer development remains unclear. Delayed menopause, polycystic ovary syndrome, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus may act as risk factors for endometrial cancer[31,32]. The former type occurs commonly in perimenopausal women and is mostly endometrial adenocarcinoma. Patients with this type of endometrial cancer exhibit a high-risk clinical presentation of endometrial hyperplasia without shedding, which is closely related to persistently high estrogen levels. The latter type is more common in older menopausal patients, and the pathological type is mostly plasmacytotic endometrial cancer. This type of endometrial cancer is highly malignant and has a relatively poor prognosis[33]. Traditional staging is a crucial clinical reference for the postoperative adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer patients; however, the clinical evaluation of this treatment is variable[34-39]. In this study, no statistically significant difference was observed in the cumulative survival rate between the two types of early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer patients. This may be because the study included data from patients with early-stage endometrial cancer with good pathological differentiation and therefore a better prognosis. Although postoperative adjuvant treatment and prognostic analysis of early-stage high-risk patients were generally good, patients who received no treatment in time continued to experience postoperative recurrence or metastasis. Therefore, postoperative adjuvant treatment was administered depending on the pathological findings of the patients. The present study suggests that not only postoperative adjuvant therapy but also other associated factors affect patient prognosis, but whether they are independent risk factors remains uncertain[40].
In this study, the cumulative survival rates of patients treated with and without postoperative adjuvant medroxyprogesterone acetate were similar, but those of patients treated with combined medroxyprogesterone acetate were higher than those of patients without combined medroxyprogesterone. This suggests that postoperative adjuvant therapy improves the clinical outcome and prognosis of early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer, especially in combination with radiotherapy. This may be because postoperative radiotherapy can inhibit the infiltration and metastasis of residual cancer cells in the blood and improve the radicality of surgical treatment.
The multifactor Cox regression analysis revealed that age, pathological type, molecular staging, and myometrial infiltration were factors influencing the prognosis of patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer. The cumulative survival rates of patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer who were aged ≥ 50 years, pathological type of adenosquamous carcinoma, molecular staging of high-copy type, with choroidal infiltration, grade N3 lymph node metastasis, and myometrial infiltration extent ≥ 1/2 were lower (P < 0.05). This indicated that the survival prognosis of early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer was closely associated with age and pathological factors. Age factors affect the prognosis of endometrial cancer patients and may be associated with multiple comorbidities, poor physical function, high incidence of specific histopathological types, adverse prognostic factors, and poor tolerance to surgical trauma and postoperative radiotherapy. and performing full-staged surgery and adequate cycles of adjuvant radiotherapy is often difficult. In this study, data showed that patients with early-stage, high-risk endometrial cancer tend to be younger, and the death risk increases with age. Thus, increasing awareness and screening for endometrial cancer in young women is necessary.
The main pathological types of endometrial cancer include plasmacytoma, clear cell carcinoma, and endometrial adenocarcinoma. The survival rate of study patients with adenosquamous carcinoma was lower than that of those with other pathological types. Therefore, in the specific clinical management of endometrial cancer, the pathological type of the patient and the early treatment of patients with adenosquamous endometrial cancer must be considered to improve their prognosis. In this study, no significant difference in survival prognosis was observed between stage I and II patients, which may be because most study patients had early-stage endometrial cancer, which was highly curative and was associated with a good prognosis after surgical treatment. The univariate analysis also exhibited a higher survival rate for patients treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, but the Cox regression analysis did not reveal that it was an independent factor for prognosis. This suggests that chemotherapy has some therapeutic effect on high-risk early-stage endometrial cancer, but it has a limited effect on its long-term prognosis.
In conclusion, many factors influence the adjuvant postoperative treatment of early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer, including age, pathological type, molecular typing, and myometrial infiltration. Postoperative adjuvant medroxyprogesterone acetate is beneficial in patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer and deserves clinical consideration.
Patients with endometrial cancer have an early onset of clinical symptoms, and although the prognosis for patients with early adjuvant postoperative treatment is generally good, patients who do not receive timely treatment may develop postoperative recurrence or metastasis, which has been associated with a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate, therefore requiring adjuvant postoperative treatment depending on the patient's pathology.
To determine the efficacy and prognosis of adjuvant treatment of endometrial cancer with medroxyprogesterone acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate and to evaluate their safety.
To provide a reference for the prognosis and anesthesia of clinical operations.
Kaplan-Meier curve analysis and log-rank test were performed to determine the potential influencing factors on the 5-year cumulative survival rate of the study patients, while Cox regression analysis was performed to identify the factors influencing the survival prognosis of endometrial cancer.
The Cox regression analysis revealed that age [hazard ratio (HR) = 4.636, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 1.411-15.237)], pathological type (HR = 6.943, 95%CI: 2.299-20.977), molecular typing (HR = 5.789, 95%CI: 3.305-10.141), myometrial infiltration (HR = 5.768, 95%CI: 1.898-17.520) were influential factors in the prognosis of patients with early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer.
The possibility of the long-term prognostic benefit of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy in patients with early-stage high-risk endometrium is worthy of clinical consideration.
Future research may investigate optimal medroxyprogesterone acetate dosage and duration for early endometrial cancer. Can explore combining medroxyprogesterone acetate with other therapies. Also, include patient-reported outcomes to understand treatment impact.
Provenance and peer review: Unsolicited article; Externally peer reviewed.
Peer-review model: Single blind
Specialty type: Obstetrics and gynecology
Country/Territory of origin: China
Peer-review report’s scientific quality classification
Grade A (Excellent): 0
Grade B (Very good): B
Grade C (Good): C
Grade D (Fair): 0
Grade E (Poor): 0
P-Reviewer: Alpini G, United States; Imamura T, Japan S-Editor: Chen YL L-Editor: A P-Editor: Chen YL
1. | Oaknin A, Bosse TJ, Creutzberg CL, Giornelli G, Harter P, Joly F, Lorusso D, Marth C, Makker V, Mirza MR, Ledermann JA, Colombo N; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022;33:860-877. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 99] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 221] [Article Influence: 110.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
2. | Peters EEM, León-Castillo A, Smit VTHBM, Boennelycke M, Hogdall E, Hogdall C, Creutzberg C, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Mens JWM, Lutgens LCHW, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Ortoft G, Bosse T, Nout R. Defining Substantial Lymphovascular Space Invasion in Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2022;41:220-226. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 3] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 29] [Article Influence: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
3. | Van Gool IC, Stelloo E, Nout RA, Nijman HW, Edmondson RJ, Church DN, MacKay HJ, Leary A, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Creutzberg CL, Smit VT, Bosse T. Prognostic significance of L1CAM expression and its association with mutant p53 expression in high-risk endometrial cancer. Mod Pathol. 2016;29:174-181. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 54] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 57] [Article Influence: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
4. | Wu CD, Zhao M. Incorporation of Molecular Catalysts in Metal-Organic Frameworks for Highly Efficient Heterogeneous Catalysis. Adv Mater. 2017;29. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 240] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 198] [Article Influence: 28.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
5. | León-Castillo A, Britton H, McConechy MK, McAlpine JN, Nout R, Kommoss S, Brucker SY, Carlson JW, Epstein E, Rau TT, Bosse T, Church DN, Gilks CB. Interpretation of somatic POLE mutations in endometrial carcinoma. J Pathol. 2020;250:323-335. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 189] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 219] [Article Influence: 54.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
6. | Spasov N, Dimitrova-Popova D, Traikova-Djambazova N, Spasova M, Bosheva M. Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Hemophilic Joints: Correlations with the Bleeding Phenotype and Physical Examination. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2020;62:762-768. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
7. | Katsoulakis E, Mattes MD, Rineer JM, Nabhani T, Mourad WF, Choi K, Schreiber D. Contemporary analysis of pelvic and para-aortic metastasis in endometrial cancer using the SEER registry. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;127:293-296. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 6] [Article Influence: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
8. | Stelloo E, Nout RA, Osse EM, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IJ, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LC, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Nijman HW, Putter H, Bosse T, Creutzberg CL, Smit VT. Improved Risk Assessment by Integrating Molecular and Clinicopathological Factors in Early-stage Endometrial Cancer-Combined Analysis of the PORTEC Cohorts. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:4215-4224. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 343] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 535] [Article Influence: 66.9] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
9. | Wortman BG, Creutzberg CL, Putter H, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Jobsen JJ, Lutgens LCHW, van der Steen-Banasik EM, Mens JWM, Slot A, Kroese MCS, van Triest B, Nijman HW, Stelloo E, Bosse T, de Boer SM, van Putten WLJ, Smit VTHBM, Nout RA; PORTEC Study Group. Ten-year results of the PORTEC-2 trial for high-intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma: improving patient selection for adjuvant therapy. Br J Cancer. 2018;119:1067-1074. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 112] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 164] [Article Influence: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
10. | Ørtoft G, Hansen ES, Bertelsen K. Omitting adjuvant radiotherapy in endometrial cancer increases the rate of locoregional recurrences but has no effect on long-term survival: the Danish Endometrial Cancer Study. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2013;23:1429-1437. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 29] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 30] [Article Influence: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
11. | Randall ME, Filiaci V, McMeekin DS, von Gruenigen V, Huang H, Yashar CM, Mannel RS, Kim JW, Salani R, DiSilvestro PA, Burke JJ, Rutherford T, Spirtos NM, Terada K, Anderson PR, Brewster WR, Small W, Aghajanian CA, Miller DS. Phase III Trial: Adjuvant Pelvic Radiation Therapy Versus Vaginal Brachytherapy Plus Paclitaxel/Carboplatin in High-Intermediate and High-Risk Early Stage Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:1810-1818. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 235] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 209] [Article Influence: 41.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
12. | de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin L, Katsaros D, Bessette P, Haie-Meder C, Ottevanger PB, Ledermann JA, Khaw P, D'Amico R, Fyles A, Baron MH, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Kitchener HC, Nijman HW, Wilson G, Brooks S, Gribaudo S, Provencher D, Hanzen C, Kruitwagen RF, Smit VTHBM, Singh N, Do V, Lissoni A, Nout RA, Feeney A, Verhoeven-Adema KW, Putter H, Creutzberg CL; PORTEC Study Group. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone in women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): patterns of recurrence and post-hoc survival analysis of a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1273-1285. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 214] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 275] [Article Influence: 55.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
13. | Park SY, Lee JG, Kim J, Byun GE, Bae MK, Lee CY, Kim DJ, Chung KY. Efficacy of platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy in T2aN0 stage IB non-small cell lung cancer. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;8:151. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 37] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 44] [Article Influence: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
14. | Matei D, Filiaci V, Randall ME, Mutch D, Steinhoff MM, DiSilvestro PA, Moxley KM, Kim YM, Powell MA, O'Malley DM, Spirtos NM, Small W Jr, Tewari KS, Richards WE, Nakayama J, Matulonis UA, Huang HQ, Miller DS. Adjuvant Chemotherapy plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:2317-2326. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 235] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 296] [Article Influence: 59.2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
15. | León-Castillo A, de Boer SM, Powell ME, Mileshkin LR, Mackay HJ, Leary A, Nijman HW, Singh N, Pollock PM, Bessette P, Fyles A, Haie-Meder C, Smit VTHBM, Edmondson RJ, Putter H, Kitchener HC, Crosbie EJ, de Bruyn M, Nout RA, Horeweg N, Creutzberg CL, Bosse T; TransPORTEC consortium. Molecular Classification of the PORTEC-3 Trial for High-Risk Endometrial Cancer: Impact on Prognosis and Benefit From Adjuvant Therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:3388-3397. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 176] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 414] [Article Influence: 103.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
16. | Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, Lybeert ML, Jobsen JJ, Wárlám-Rodenhuis CC, De Winter KA, Lutgens LC, van den Bergh AC, van der Steen-Banasik E, Beerman H, van Lent M; PORTEC Study Group. Survival after relapse in patients with endometrial cancer: results from a randomized trial. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;89:201-209. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 288] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 243] [Article Influence: 11.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
17. | Creutzberg CL, van Putten WL, Koper PC, Lybeert ML, Jobsen JJ, Wárlám-Rodenhuis CC, De Winter KA, Lutgens LC, van den Bergh AC, van de Steen-Banasik E, Beerman H, van Lent M. Surgery and postoperative radiotherapy vs surgery alone for patients with stage-1 endometrial carcinoma: multicentre randomised trial. PORTEC Study Group. Post Operative Radiation Therapy in Endometrial Carcinoma. Lancet. 2000;355:1404-1411. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 1362] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1264] [Article Influence: 52.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
18. | Shikama A, Minaguchi T, Takao W, Hosokawa Y, Nishida K, Tasaka N, Akiyama A, Sakurai M, Ochi H, Satoh T. Predictors of favorable survival after secondary cytoreductive surgery for recurrent endometrial cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2019;24:1256-1263. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 10] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 10] [Article Influence: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
19. | Miller DS, Filiaci VL, Mannel RS, Cohn DE, Matsumoto T, Tewari KS, DiSilvestro P, Pearl ML, Argenta PA, Powell MA, Zweizig SL, Warshal DP, Hanjani P, Carney ME, Huang H, Cella D, Zaino R, Fleming GF. Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Final Overall Survival and Adverse Event Analysis of a Phase III Trial (NRG Oncology/GOG0209). J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:3841-3850. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 62] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 137] [Article Influence: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
20. | Nagao S, Nishio S, Michimae H, Tanabe H, Okada S, Otsuki T, Tanioka M, Fujiwara K, Suzuki M, Kigawa J. Applicability of the concept of "platinum sensitivity" to recurrent endometrial cancer: the SGSG-012/GOTIC-004/Intergroup study. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;131:567-573. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 41] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 42] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
21. | Fraison E, Kostova E, Moran LJ, Bilal S, Ee CC, Venetis C, Costello MF. Metformin vs the combined oral contraceptive pill for hirsutism, acne, and menstrual pattern in polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;8:CD005552. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 17] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 20] [Article Influence: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
22. | Mileshkin L, Edmondson R, O'Connell RL, Sjoquist KM, Andrews J, Jyothirmayi R, Beale P, Bonaventura T, Goh J, Hall M, Clamp A, Green J, Lord R, Amant F, Alexander L, Carty K, Paul J, Scurry J, Millan D, Nottley S, Friedlander M; PARAGON study group. Phase 2 study of anastrozole in recurrent estrogen (ER)/progesterone (PR) positive endometrial cancer: The PARAGON trial - ANZGOG 0903. Gynecol Oncol. 2019;154:29-37. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 33] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 17] [Article Influence: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
23. | O'Malley DM, Bariani GM, Cassier PA, Marabelle A, Hansen AR, De Jesus Acosta A, Miller WH Jr, Safra T, Italiano A, Mileshkin L, Xu L, Jin F, Norwood K, Maio M. Pembrolizumab in Patients With Microsatellite Instability-High Advanced Endometrial Cancer: Results From the KEYNOTE-158 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:752-761. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 74] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 218] [Article Influence: 109.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
24. | Makker V, Colombo N, Casado Herráez A, Santin AD, Colomba E, Miller DS, Fujiwara K, Pignata S, Baron-Hay S, Ray-Coquard I, Shapira-Frommer R, Ushijima K, Sakata J, Yonemori K, Kim YM, Guerra EM, Sanli UA, McCormack MM, Smith AD, Keefe S, Bird S, Dutta L, Orlowski RJ, Lorusso D; Study 309-KEYNOTE-775 Investigators. Lenvatinib plus Pembrolizumab for Advanced Endometrial Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:437-448. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 175] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 441] [Article Influence: 220.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
25. | Makker V, Taylor MH, Aghajanian C, Oaknin A, Mier J, Cohn AL, Romeo M, Bratos R, Brose MS, DiSimone C, Messing M, Stepan DE, Dutcus CE, Wu J, Schmidt EV, Orlowski R, Sachdev P, Shumaker R, Casado Herraez A. Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:2981-2992. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 344] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 330] [Article Influence: 82.5] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
26. | Fader AN, Roque DM, Siegel E, Buza N, Hui P, Abdelghany O, Chambers SK, Secord AA, Havrilesky L, O'Malley DM, Backes F, Nevadunsky N, Edraki B, Pikaart D, Lowery W, ElSahwi KS, Celano P, Bellone S, Azodi M, Litkouhi B, Ratner E, Silasi DA, Schwartz PE, Santin AD. Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Trastuzumab in Uterine Serous Carcinomas That Overexpress Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2/neu. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:2044-2051. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 206] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 300] [Article Influence: 50.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
27. | Slomovitz BM, Jiang Y, Yates MS, Soliman PT, Johnston T, Nowakowski M, Levenback C, Zhang Q, Ring K, Munsell MF, Gershenson DM, Lu KH, Coleman RL. Phase II study of everolimus and letrozole in patients with recurrent endometrial carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:930-936. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 176] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 203] [Article Influence: 22.6] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
28. | Liu JF, Xiong N, Campos SM, Wright AA, Krasner C, Schumer S, Horowitz N, Veneris J, Tayob N, Morrissey S, West G, Quinn R, Matulonis UA, Konstantinopoulos PA. Phase II Study of the WEE1 Inhibitor Adavosertib in Recurrent Uterine Serous Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39:1531-1539. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 34] [Article Influence: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
29. | Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:115-132. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11444] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12886] [Article Influence: 1610.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (2)] |
30. | Rubino D, Abrahamsson N, Davies M, Hesse D, Greenway FL, Jensen C, Lingvay I, Mosenzon O, Rosenstock J, Rubio MA, Rudofsky G, Tadayon S, Wadden TA, Dicker D; STEP 4 Investigators. Effect of Continued Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Placebo on Weight Loss Maintenance in Adults With Overweight or Obesity: The STEP 4 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2021;325:1414-1425. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 208] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 485] [Article Influence: 161.7] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
31. | Zhao D, Wu LY, Wang XB, Li XG. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16:2369-2373. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
32. | Lethaby A, Puscasiu L, Vollenhoven B. Preoperative medical therapy before surgery for uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;11:CD000547. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 27] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 36] [Article Influence: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
33. | Anderson AS, Key TJ, Norat T, Scoccianti C, Cecchini M, Berrino F, Boutron-Ruault MC, Espina C, Leitzmann M, Powers H, Wiseman M, Romieu I. European Code against Cancer 4th Edition: Obesity, body fatness and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. 2015;39 Suppl 1:S34-S45. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 92] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 82] [Article Influence: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
34. | Grant Y, Thiruchelvam PTR, Kovacevic L, Mossialos E, Al-Mufti R, Hogben K, Hadjiminas DJ, Leff DR. Patient-level costs of staged unilateral vs immediate bilateral symmetrization mammoplasty in breast-conserving surgery. BJS Open. 2022;6. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 2] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
35. | Gao FF, Zhang XL, Chen JL, Zhang TT, Sui XC, Tang YD, Liu NF. Tislelizumab Combined with Carboplatin-Paclitaxel for Treatment of Metastatic or Recurrent Endometrial Cancer: a Retrospective Clinical Study. Clin Lab. 2022;68. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
36. | Ota A, Ulrih NP. An Overview of Herbal Products and Secondary Metabolites Used for Management of Type Two Diabetes. Front Pharmacol. 2017;8:436. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 113] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 91] [Article Influence: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
37. | Ding L, Li H, Wang Y. Application of Jianpi Xiaoai Recipe Combined with Cisplatin and Adriamycin in the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer and Its Effect on Disease Control Rate. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021;2021:2258183. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 2] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 1] [Article Influence: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
38. | Koetsawang S. Injected long--acting medroxyprogesterone acetate. Effect on human lactation and concentrations in milk. J Med Assoc Thai. 1977;60:57-60. [PubMed] [Cited in This Article: ] |
39. | Whitney BM, Guthrie BL, Srinivasan S, Tapia K, Muriuki EM, Chohan BH, Wallis JM, Liu C, McClelland RS, Fredricks DN, Roxby AC. Changes in key vaginal bacteria among postpartum African women initiating intramuscular depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0229586. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 8] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 12] [Article Influence: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |
40. | Shi S, Hong T, Jiang F, Zhuang Y, Chen L, Huang X. Letrozole and human menopausal gonadotropin for ovulation induction in clomiphene resistance polycystic ovary syndrome patients: A randomized controlled study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020;99:e18383. [PubMed] [DOI] [Cited in This Article: ] [Cited by in Crossref: 11] [Cited by in F6Publishing: 15] [Article Influence: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis (0)] |