Copyright
©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Clin Cases. Jun 26, 2021; 9(18): 4668-4680
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4668
Published online Jun 26, 2021. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4668
Figure 1 AWGS2019 and EWGSOP2 criteria for the diagnosis of sarcopenia.
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier curves for overall survival in patients with or without sarcopenia.
A: AWGS2019; B: EWGSOP2.
Figure 3 The higher the concordance index (P < 0.
001), the lower the Akaike information criterion, and the higher area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve of AWGS2019-sarcopenia model reflects a more accurate model in predicting the long-term overall survival than EWGSOP2-sarcopenia model. A: Concordance index for overall survival in patients with AWGS2019 and EWGSOP2; B-D: Time-dependent area under time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve for overall survival in patients with AWGS2019 and EWGSOP2 at 1 year (B), 3 years (C), and 5 years (D). AUC: Area under the curve; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; C-index: Concordance index.
- Citation: Wu WY, Dong JJ, Huang XC, Chen ZJ, Chen XL, Dong QT, Bai YY. AWGS2019 vs EWGSOP2 for diagnosing sarcopenia to predict long-term prognosis in Chinese patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy . World J Clin Cases 2021; 9(18): 4668-4680
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v9/i18/4668.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v9.i18.4668