Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 16, 2023; 11(35): 8291-8299
Published online Dec 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i35.8291
Published online Dec 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i35.8291
Figure 1 Flowchart of the study.
EVLT: Endovenous laser treatment; PSM: Propensity score matching.
Figure 2 Comparison of recurrence between the endovenous laser treatment and conventional surgery groups before and after propensity score matching.
A: Before propensity score matching; B: After propensity score matching. The recurrence rate of endovenous laser treatment group was higher than conventional surgery group both before and after propensity score matching. CS: Conventional surgery; EVLT: Endovenous laser treatment.
Figure 3 Pain levels in patients who underwent endovenous laser treatment or conventional surgery, before and after propensity score matching, measured using a visual analog scale.
CS: Conventional surgery; EVLT: Endovenous laser treatment; PSM: Propensity score matching; VAS: Visual analog scale.
- Citation: Li Q, Zhang C, Yuan Z, Shao ZQ, Wang J. Endovenous laser treatment vs conventional surgery for great saphenous vein varicosities: A propensity score matching analysis. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(35): 8291-8299
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i35/8291.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i35.8291