Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 26, 2023; 11(24): 5643-5652
Published online Aug 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5643
Published online Aug 26, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5643
Figure 1 Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival of patients with different reduction rates of monoclonal protein after the first cycle of chemotherapy (P < 0.
001). A: Progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with a reduction rate of monoclonal protein (M protein) after first chemotherapy of ≥ 25% vs < 25%; B: PFS of patients with a reduction rate of M protein after first chemotherapy of ≥ 50% vs < 50%. PFS: Progression-free survival.
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival of patients with different reduction rates of monoclonal protein after the fourth cycle of chemotherapy (P < 0.
001). A: Progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with a reduction rate of monoclonal protein (M protein) after the fourth chemotherapy cycle of ≥ 25% vs < 25%; B: PFS of patients with a reduction rate of M protein after fourth chemotherapy of ≥ 50% vs < 50%; C: PFS of patients with a reduction rate of M protein after fourth chemotherapy of ≥ 75% vs < 75%. PFS: Progression-free survival.
- Citation: Liu M, Zhang JY. Reduction rate of monoclonal protein as a useful prognostic factor in standard-risk group of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11(24): 5643-5652
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v11/i24/5643.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i24.5643