BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Case Report
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Feb 26, 2022; 10(6): 2023-2029
Published online Feb 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i6.2023
Figure 1
Figure 1 Contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A: Axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) image shows an intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (IPSVS; arrow) extending from the right posterior portal vein to the right hepatic vein; B: An axial CECT image shows the IPSVS (arrow) and narrow left portal vein (arrowhead); C: An axial CECT image shows the IPSVS (arrowhead) communicating with the right hepatic vein (arrow); D: An oblique reformatted computed tomography image shows the IPSVS with a shunt tract (arrowheads) that extends to the right posterior portal vein.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Superior mesenteric arterial portography image. A: Superior mesenteric arterial portography image shows communication between the right portal and hepatic veins (arrow); B: Connections between the right portal and hepatic veins are observed following the injection of contrast media via a micro-catheter that was advanced into the portal vein; C: The right hepatic vein is occluded by the balloon catheter to decrease the hepatofugal blood flow into the intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (IPSVS), and the IPSVS is observed with balloon-occluded retrograde right hepatic venography (arrow); D: Superior mesenteric arterial portography after the procedure shows that the IPSVS is sufficiently occupied by coils, and there is no residual hepatofugal blood flow into the IPSVS.
Figure 3
Figure 3 An axial contrast-enhanced computed tomography image that was obtained one week after the procedure reveals sufficient embolization of the intrahepatic portosystemic shunt and expansion of the left intrahepatic portal vein (arrow).


Write to the Help Desk