Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2022; 10(36): 13200-13207
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13200
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13200
Figure 1 Microtaze AFM-712 generator and sounding applicator (Alfresa Pharma Co, Osaka, Japan).
Figure 2 Changes in the visual analog scale score.
A: Hypermenorrhea after microwave endometrial ablation. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (error bars). aP < 0.01 relative to the result before surgery; B: Dysmenorrhea after microwave endometrial ablation. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (error bars). aP < 0.01 relative to the result before surgery. MEA: Microwave endometrial ablation.
Figure 3 Comparing blood hemoglobin concentrations before and after microwave endometrial ablation.
MEA: Microwave endometrial ablation.
- Citation: Kakinuma T, Kakinuma K, Shimizu A, Kaneko A, Kagimoto M, Okusa T, Suizu E, Saito K, Matsuda Y, Yanagida K, Takeshima N, Ohwada M. Effectiveness of microwave endometrial ablation combined with hysteroscopic transcervical resection in treating submucous uterine myomas . World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(36): 13200-13207
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i36/13200.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13200