Case Report
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2022; 10(14): 4550-4562
Published online May 16, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i14.4550
Figure 1
Figure 1 Extraoral and intraoral photographs before treatment.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Pretreatment models.
Figure 3
Figure 3 Pretreatment radiographs. A: Panoramic radiograph; B: Apical radiograph; C: Cephalometric radiograph.
Figure 4
Figure 4 Diagram of the treatment process.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Periodontal surgery process and periodontal status 3 mo after surgery. A and B: Facial and palatal bone defects after flap elevation; C and D: Bone particulate transplantation and collagen membrane insertion; E: Operation after suturing; F: Periodontal status 2 mo after surgery.
Figure 6
Figure 6 Treatment progress. A-C: Photographs at 1, 2 and 3 mo after the start of orthodontic treatment.
Figure 7
Figure 7 Posttreatment intraoral photographs and periodontal probing. The periodontal tissue was in good condition, with no deep periodontal pockets.
Figure 8
Figure 8 Intraoral photographs after a follow-up period of 15 mo. A space of 1 mm was observed between the upper right lateral incisor and the upper right central incisor.
Figure 9
Figure 9 Second phase of orthodontic treatment and follow-up. A and B: Orthodontic treatment to open space distal to the upper right canine; C: Treatment result.
Figure 10
Figure 10  Posttreatment cephalometric radiograph. A: Cephalometric radiograph after treatment; B: Conventional cephalometric superimposition of tracings before and after treatment.
Figure 11
Figure 11  Posttreatment radiographs (43 mo after periodontal surgery).
Figure 12
Figure 12  Posttreatment extraoral and intraoral photographs and periodontal probing on follow-up 1 year after orthodontic treatment.
Figure 13
Figure 13  Follow-up 3 years after treatment. A and B: Posttreatment extraoral and intraoral photographs; C: Apical radiograph; D and E: Periodontal probing.