BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Thakkar S, Kantroo V, Nagendra L, Dutta D, Kamrul-Hasan ABM, Kalra S, Bhattacharya S. Endocrine consequences of antifungal therapy: A missed entity. World J Clin Cases 2026; 14(2): 117140 [PMID: 41608146 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v14.i2.117140]
Reader's ID:
05792223
Submitted on:
January 17, 2026, 04:05
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
Systemic antifungal therapy is the backbone of treatment for invasive fungal infections, but it carries an under-recognized burden of endocrine and physiological toxicity. The review by Thakkar et al. (2026) provides an important framework for understanding how these agents affect human cytochrome P450 enzymes and renal function, leading to adrenal insufficiency, mineralocorticoid excess, and electrolyte abnormalities. This review deserves recognition, and adding a global perspective to it could provide new recommendations. If possible, I would like to submit a letter addressing this perspective.