BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Manuscript Reader Comments
Sial F, Basit A, Ghafoor N, Sial W, Basil AM. Mixed connective tissue disease and tuberculosis coexistence as a diagnostic dilemma: A case report. World J Clin Cases 2025; 13(33): 109866 [PMID: 41356082 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v13.i33.109866]
Reader's ID:
03628402
Submitted on:
November 24, 2025, 09:34
Reader Expertise:
Reader’s expertise on the topic of the manuscript
Conflicts-of-Interest Statement:
Does the reader have a conflict of interest?
Reader Comment Standards for Published Articles:
1 Title
Does the title reflect the main subject/hypothesis of the manuscript?
2 Abstract
Does the abstract summarize and reflect the work described in the manuscript?
3 Key Words
Do the key words reflect the focus of the manuscript?
4 Background
Does the manuscript adequately describe the background, present status and significance of the study?
5 Methods
Does the manuscript describe methods (e.g., experiments, data analysis, surveys, and clinical trials, etc.) in adequate detail?
6 Results
Are the research objectives achieved by the experiments used in this study?
Has the study made meaningful contributions towards research progress in this field?
7 Discussion
Does the manuscript interpret the findings adequately and appropriately, highlighting the key points concisely, clearly and logically?
Are the findings and their applicability/relevance to the literature stated in a clear and definite manner?
Is the Discussion accurate and does it discuss the paper’s scientific significance and/or relevance to clinical practice sufficiently?
8 Illustrations and Tables
Are the figures, diagrams and tables sufficient, good quality and appropriately illustrative of the paper contents?
Do figures require labeling with arrows, asterisks, etc., or better legends?
9 Biostatistics
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of biostatistics?
10 Units
Does the manuscript meet the requirements of use of SI units?
11 References
Does the manuscript appropriately cite the latest, important and authoritative references in the Introduction and Discussion sections?
Does the author self-cite, omit, incorrectly cite and/or over-cite references?
12 Quality of manuscript organization and presentation
Is the manuscript concisely and coherently organized and presented?
Are the style, language and grammar accurate and appropriate?
13 Ethics statements
For all manuscripts involving human studies and/or animal experiments, author(s) must submit the related formal ethics documents that were reviewed and approved by their local ethical review committee. Did the manuscript meet the requirements of ethics?
Scientific Quality:
The overall quality of the manuscript, based on the above-listed criteria, should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories
Language Quality:
Language quality (style, grammar, and spelling) should be evaluated and classified according to the following five categories.
Reader Comments:
The authors present a clinically important case highlighting the coexistence of mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD) and tuberculosis (TB), a scenario that poses substantial diagnostic challenges in TB-endemic regions. The manuscript is well structured and clearly describes the sequence of clinical events, laboratory workup, and therapeutic decisions. The discussion appropriately emphasizes the overlap between autoimmune manifestations and infectious etiologies, particularly when both present with pulmonary involvement. From an academic standpoint, the case is relevant and contributes meaningfully to the limited global literature examining MCTD–TB coexistence. The authors successfully integrate immunological findings with epidemiological considerations, underscoring the need for high clinical suspicion and comprehensive autoimmune evaluation in complex presentations. The reference list is current and well selected, drawing from both rheumatology and infectious disease literature. The language is generally clear and understandable, although a few sections may benefit from stylistic tightening to improve flow, particularly in the discussion where multiple concepts are presented in close succession. Minor grammatical refinements could enhance readability. The inclusion of comprehensive tables and immunological profiles strengthens the diagnostic clarity of the case. For future research and case documentation, the authors may consider: 1. Providing a more detailed longitudinal follow-up, especially regarding TB status, autoimmune markers, and treatment tapering, as long-term outcomes for MCTD-TB coexistence are not well described in the literature. 2. Elaborating on radiologic findings, given the central role of imaging in differentiating pulmonary TB from autoimmune lung involvement. 3. Discussing possible immunopathological links between chronic infections and autoimmune flare, which could enrich the mechanistic understanding of such overlap syndromes. 4. Addressing medication safety monitoring, particularly concerning hepatotoxicity in the context of ATT combined with corticosteroids and hydroxychloroquine. Overall, this is a valuable clinical contribution that highlights key diagnostic considerations in resource-limited, TB-endemic settings. The manuscript is academically sound, clinically relevant, and will be informative for physicians managing complex autoimmune presentations.