Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i2.113663
Revised: September 20, 2025
Accepted: November 26, 2025
Published online: June 20, 2026
Processing time: 234 Days and 18.3 Hours
Little information exists on the amount or type of training required for diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) competency.
To determine the number of directly-supervised DUS cases required for DUS-naive trainees to achieve competency for independent practice.
A prospective observational study was conducted in the intensive care unit, among trainees without prior DUS experience. Trainees completed a theoretical module and questionnaire, then performed a standardized DUS protocol on both right and left hemi-diaphragms under supervision. Trainees were tasked to determine: (1) Diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF), as a percentage difference of the diaphragm thickness at end-inspiration compared to thickness at end-expi
Thirteen trainees (mean age 29.5 years; 7 females) scanned 5 patients each, whereby each trainee would have acquired 150 hemi-diaphragm images for 20 sets of DTF measurements and 10 sets of DE measurements. Across 65 supervised assessments on 52 patients, measurement agreement improved with repeated attempts, particularly for DTF, reaching near 100% by the fifth attempt. Interpretation agreement was consistently high (> 80%) from the start and also approached 100% with training. However, some trainees still required assistance with left diaphragm assessments, especially excursion.
Our training approach allowed DUS-naive trainees to achieve adequate skills to perform unsupervised DUS evaluation of the right hemi-diaphragm after at least 5 patient encounters. For left DTF and DE, some trainees require more supervised scans to achieve competency for independent practice.
Core Tip: We performed a prospective observational study to determine the number of directly-supervised diaphragm ultrasound (DUS) cases required for DUS-naive trainees to achieve competency. Thirteen trainees completed a theoretical module and questionnaire, then performed a standardized DUS protocol on both right and left hemi-diaphragms under supervision. Our training approach allowed DUS-naive trainees to achieve adequate skills to perform unsupervised right DUS evaluation over a relatively short training period which included at least 20 sets of supervised measurements to assess diaphragm thickening fraction, and at least 10 sets of supervised measurements to assess diaphragm excursion. A higher number of supervised scans may be needed for left DUS training.
