BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.
World J Nephrol. Sep 25, 2026; 15(3): 119576
Published online Sep 25, 2026. doi: 10.5527/wjn.119576
Renal functional and surgical outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar vs non-hilar tumors: Trifecta and pentafecta evaluation
Takuto Hara, Kotaro Suzuki, Naoto Wakita, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Hideto Ueki, Yukari Bando, Tomoaki Terakawa, Yoji Hyodo, Koji Chiba, Jun Teishima, Akihisa Yao, Hideaki Miyake
Takuto Hara, Kotaro Suzuki, Naoto Wakita, Yasuyoshi Okamura, Hideto Ueki, Yukari Bando, Tomoaki Terakawa, Yoji Hyodo, Koji Chiba, Jun Teishima, Akihisa Yao, Hideaki Miyake, Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe 6500017, Hyōgo, Japan
Author contributions: Hara T contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, investigation, and original draft; Suzuki K, Wakita N, Okamura Y, Ueki H, Bando Y, Terakawa T, Hyodo Y, Chiba K, Teishima J, Yao A, and Miyake H contributed to the review and editing of the manuscript; Miyake H contributed to supervision. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Institutional review board statement: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kobe University (approval No. B230143).
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained through an opt-out procedure approved by the Institutional Review Board.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
STROBE statement: The authors have read the STROBE Statement-checklist of items, and the manuscript was prepared and revised according to the STROBE Statement-checklist of items.
Data sharing statement: The data supporting the findings of this study are not publicly available due to privacy and ethical restrictions. Data may be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request and subject to approval by the Institutional Review Board.
Corresponding author: Takuto Hara, MD, PhD, Department of Urology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, 7-5-2, Kusunoki-cho, Chuo-ku, Kobe 6500017, Hyōgo, Japan. supermarimo85@carp.kobe-u.ac.jp
Received: February 3, 2026
Revised: February 18, 2026
Accepted: April 3, 2026
Published online: September 25, 2026
Processing time: 194 Days and 23.1 Hours
Abstract
BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is well-suited for managing complex renal tumors, including those located in the renal hilum. However, studies directly comparing RAPN outcomes for hilar and non-hilar tumors, particularly in terms of comprehensive measures, such as trifecta and pentafecta, are still limited.

AIM

To evaluate whether tumor location in the renal hilum independently influences surgical and renal functional outcomes after RAPN, as assessed by trifecta and pentafecta criteria.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated outcomes of RAPN for hilar and non-hilar renal tumors treated from April 2016 to June 2023. Eligible patients had tumors ≤ 7 cm, no metastasis, and at least one year of follow-up. Propensity score matching was applied. Primary endpoints were trifecta and pentafecta achievement. All procedures were performed under ischemia without early unclamping. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors of outcome achievement.

RESULTS

Of 350 patients, 324 met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 60 hilar and 264 non-hilar tumors. Trifecta achievement was similar between hilar (63.3%) and non-hilar groups (64.0%), with no significant differences in ischemia time, positive margins, or major complications. Pentafecta achievement rates were also similar (20.0% hilar vs 14.0% non-hilar, P = 0.237). Multivariate analysis identified R score, N score, and L score as predictors of pentafecta non-achievement. Surgeon experience and hilar tumor presence were predictors of pentafecta achievement. Hilar tumor location was not an independent determinant in the propensity-matched analysis, suggesting that the adjustment methods and sample size may have influenced the results.

CONCLUSION

RAPN achieved comparable trifecta and pentafecta outcomes for hilar and non-hilar tumors, supporting its viability for complex hilar tumors when appropriate patient selection and surgical experience are ensured.

Keywords: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy; Hilar tumors; Renal cell carcinoma; Trifecta; Pentafecta; RENAL nephrometry score

Core Tip: This retrospective cohort study evaluated surgical and renal functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for hilar and non-hilar renal tumors using trifecta and pentafecta metrics. While trifecta reflects perioperative quality, pentafecta incorporates renal functional preservation and chronic kidney disease progression, which are clinically relevant from a nephrological perspective. Using propensity score matching and multivariate analysis, we demonstrate that robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can achieve comparable pentafecta outcomes in hilar and non-hilar tumors when tumor complexity and surgical experience are appropriately considered, supporting the feasibility of nephron-sparing surgery for anatomically complex hilar tumors.

Write to the Help Desk