BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2015. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Virology. Feb 12, 2015; 4(1): 13-16
Published online Feb 12, 2015. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v4.i1.13
What psychiatric screening and monitoring might be needed with the new generation of hepatitis C treatments?
Paul J Rowan
Paul J Rowan, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX 77030, United States
Author contributions: Rowan PJ contributed to this paper.
Correspondence to: Paul J Rowan, PhD, MPH, University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Houston School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler Drive, Houston, TX 77030, United States. paul.j.rowan@uth.tmc.edu
Telephone: +1-713-5009183 Fax: +1-713-5009171
Received: July 29, 2014
Peer-review started: July 29, 2014
First decision: November 3, 2014
Revised: November 11, 2014
Accepted: November 17, 2014
Article in press: November 19, 2014
Published online: February 12, 2015
Processing time: 175 Days and 11.5 Hours
Abstract

Psychiatric difficulties, including depression and alcohol use disorders, pose a challenge to treatment decision-making for chronic hepatitis C. This is especially made worse because interferon-alpha, as part of the standard of care, may exacerbate depressive symptoms and cause suicidal symptoms to appear. This requires a treatment setting that has the capacity to carry out psychiatric assessment and monitoring, and the capability to deliver patient education regarding these aspects of care. Psychiatric comorbidities create a challenging decision-making situation, especially since success rates for the most common hepatitis C genotype, genotype 1, hover around 40%. In recent years, new treatments have emerged. These significantly boost the likelihood of sustained viral response, including for genotype 1, and do not seem to have the side effects of interferon-alpha or ribavirin. Relevant data are reviewed to assess the degree that these new treatments might reduce the portion not eligible for treatment due to psychiatric comorbidities, and might reduce the emergence of psychiatric symptoms during treatment. Several organizations have recently released evidence-based treatment recommendation guidelines. It is apparent that interferon-alpha continues to be a standard of care, with the new drugs added to this recognized regimen in order to shorten treatment and to boost efficacy. Clinical settings must continue to assess appropriateness for treatment, including current or recent psychiatric comorbidities, and must continue to closely monitor patients for the emergence of psychiatric side effects. The newly developed hepatitis C treatments may affect the metabolism of several categories of psychiatric drugs, and so drug-drug interactions must also be considered and monitored. With many promising drugs under development, an all-pill regimen, with no interferon-alpha and no ribavirin, may emerge in the near future. This will greatly change the challenge of treatment decision-making, and should expand the portion of patients able to successfully complete a treatment regimen.

Keywords: Depression; Therapy; Psychiatry; Review; Clinical

Core tip: Emerging hepatitis C treatment regimens, which include newer medications such as boceprevir, telaprevir, sofosbuvir, and simeprevir, hold promise to reduce the need for psychosocial screening and monitoring. Thus far, these medications do not seem to have the same psychiatric side effect profile as interferon-alpha.