BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Aug 19, 2026; 16(8): 120395
Published online Aug 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.120395
Table 1 Comparison of baseline data between two groups, mean ± SD/n (%)
Baseline data
Control group (n = 100)
Observation group (n = 100)
t/χ2 value
P value
Age (years)26.85 ± 1.6526.94 ± 1.720.3780.706
Pre-pregnancy body mass index (kg/m2)22.17 ± 2.1922.31 ± 2.280.4430.658
Ethnicity0.1770.675
Han Chinese86 (86.00)88 (88.00)
Ethnic minority14 (14.00)12 (12.00)
Educational level0.1260.939
Junior high school and below21 (21.00)23 (23.00)
Technical secondary school/high school60 (60.00)59 (59.00)
College degree or above19 (19.00)18 (18.00)
Place of residence0.2120.645
Town/city68 (68.00)71 (71.00)
Rural area32 (32.00)29 (29.00)
Monthly family income (Chinese yuan)0.9770.614
< 500025 (25.00)24 (24.00)
5000-800068 (68.00)65 (65.00)
> 80007 (7.00)11 (11.00)
Abnormalities found during pre-pregnancy examination0.9070.341
Yes14 (14.00)19 (19.00)
No86 (86.00)81 (81.00)
Early pregnancy work status2.7340.255
Resting at home23 (23.00)21 (21.00)
Work reduction44 (44.00)55 (55.00)
Normal operation33 (33.00)24 (24.00)
Table 2 Comparison of the scores for knowledge-belief-behavior prenatal health care between the two groups (points, mean ± SD)
Knowledge-belief-behavior scale
Phase
Control group (n = 100)
Observation group (n = 100)
t value
P value
Health knowledge rating (points)Before the intervention6.32 ± 0.746.18 ± 0.851.2420.216
After the intervention9.85 ± 1.21a11.25 ± 1.36a7.691< 0.001
Health attitude rating (points)Before the intervention3.15 ± 0.323.20 ± 0.371.0220.308
After the intervention4.21 ± 0.36a4.95 ± 0.44a13.020< 0.001
Healthcare behavior rating (points)Before the intervention2.98 ± 0.272.93 ± 0.241.3840.168
After the intervention3.67 ± 0.43a4.25 ± 0.53a8.498< 0.001
Total rating (points)Before the intervention12.42 ± 0.9012.33 ± 0.930.6950.488
After the intervention17.66 ± 1.35a20.49 ± 1.51a13.970< 0.001
Table 3 Comparison of anxiety scores between two groups (points, mean ± SD)
HAMA scale
Phase
Control group (n = 100)
Observation group (n = 100)
t value
P value
HAMA rating (points)Before the intervention13.42 ± 1.4813.58 ± 1.690.7120.477
After the intervention15.54 ± 2.95a14.03 ± 2.05b4.203< 0.001
Table 4 Comparison of risk avoidance behavior abilities between two groups (points, mean ± SD)
HPLP-II scale
Phase
Control group (n = 100)
Observation group (n = 100)
t value
P value
Interpersonal relationships rating (points)Before the intervention17.06 ± 2.3117.15 ± 2.340.2740.785
After the intervention18.42 ± 2.45a20.18 ± 2.66a4.867< 0.001
Nutrition rating (points)Before the intervention14.46 ± 1.2814.37 ± 1.180.5170.606
After the intervention18.54 ± 1.77a21.48 ± 1.96a11.130< 0.001
Health responsibility rating (points)Before the intervention15.67 ± 0.9815.56 ± 0.850.8480.397
After the intervention19.40 ± 1.35a22.71 ± 1.48a16.520< 0.001
Sports activities rating (points)Before the intervention13.87 ± 1.1913.85 ± 1.210.1180.906
After the intervention17.45 ± 1.72a19.23 ± 1.86a7.026< 0.001
Stress management rating (points)Before the intervention14.92 ± 1.1814.87 ± 1.040.3180.751
After the intervention16.83 ± 1.59a19.25 ± 1.58a10.801< 0.001
Spiritual growth rating (points)Before the intervention14.76 ± 0.9714.68 ± 0.930.5950.552
After the intervention17.54 ± 1.26a20.56 ± 1.79a13.801< 0.001
Total rating (points)Before the intervention90.79 ± 3.3390.31 ± 3.351.0160.311
After the intervention108.18 ± 4.42a123.41 ± 4.31a24.670< 0.001
Table 5 Comparison of adverse pregnancy outcomes and incidence of neonatal birth defects between two groups, n (%)
Group
n
Adverse pregnancy outcomes
Birth defects in newborns
Premature birth
Low birth weight infants
Macrosomia
Overall incidence rate
Control group1004 (4.00)4 (4.00)2 (2.00)10 (10.00)4 (4.00)
Observation group1001 (1.00)1 (1.00)0 (0.00)2 (2.00)0 (0.00)
χ2 value5.6744.082
P value0.0170.043


Write to the Help Desk