Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Jul 19, 2026; 16(7): 117775
Published online Jul 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.117775
Published online Jul 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.117775
Table 1 Comparison of general data of the two groups of patients (n = 78), n (%)/mean ± SD
| Index | Control group (n = 78) | Study group (n = 78) | t/χ² value | P value |
| Age (year) | 62.35 ± 5.12 | 61.87 ± 4.98 | 0.587 | 0.557 |
| Gender | 0.164 | 0.686 | ||
| Male | 44 (56.40) | 45 (57.69) | ||
| Female | 34 (43.60) | 33 (42.31) | ||
| Pressure ulcer stage | 0.321 | 0.571 | ||
| Phase III | 48 (61.54) | 51 (65.38) | ||
| Phase IV | 30 (38.46) | 27 (34.62) | ||
| Reasons for bed rest | 1.235 | 0.540 | ||
| Sequelae of stroke | 35 (44.87) | 33 (42.31) | ||
| Parkinson’s disease | 18 (23.08) | 20 (25.64) | ||
| Alzheimer’s disease | 18 (23.08) | 16 (20.51) | ||
| Other | 7 (8.97) | 9 (11.54) | ||
| Underlying diseases | 0.876 | 0.645 | ||
| Hypertension | 53 (67.95) | 55 (70.51) | ||
| Diabetes | 35 (44.87) | 34 (43.59) | ||
| Coronary heart disease | 25 (32.05) | 27 (34.62) | ||
| Degree of infection | 0.512 | 0.774 | ||
| Mild infection (WBC 10-15 × 109/L) | 30 (38.46) | 31 (39.74) | ||
| Moderate infection (WBC 15-20 × 109/L) | 33 (42.31) | 32 (41.03) | ||
| Severe infection (WBC > 20 × 109/L) | 16 (20.51) | 15 (19.23) |
Table 2 Comparison of prognostic indicators between the two groups (n = 78), n (%)/mean ± SD
| Index | Control group (n = 78) | Study group (n = 78) | Statistic | P value |
| Wound healing effect | u = 2.357 | 0.018 | ||
| Recovery from illness | 22 (28.21) | 35 (44.87) | ||
| Conspicuous effect | 25 (32.05) | 24 (30.77) | ||
| Effective | 12 (15.38) | 13 (16.67) | ||
| Void of effect | 19 (24.36) | 6 (7.69) | ||
| Total effective rate (%) | 75.64 | 92.31 | χ2 = 8.050 | 0.005 |
| Wound healing time (day) | 52.36 ± 7.82 | 43.15 ± 6.54 | t = 7.981 | < 0.001 |
| Total length of stay (day) | 58.24 ± 8.15 | 49.37 ± 7.26 | t = 7.176 | < 0.001 |
Table 3 Comparison of infection and nutritional indicators between the two groups before and after intervention, n (%)/mean ± SD
| Index | Time point | Control group (n = 78) | Study group (n = 78) | t/χ² value | P value |
| WBC (× 109/L) | Before intervention | 16.87 ± 3.25 | 17.02 ± 3.18 | -0.291 | 0.771 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 11.23 ± 2.15 | 8.56 ± 1.87 | 8.275 | < 0.001 | |
| RBC (× 1012/L) | Before intervention | 3.52 ± 0.48 | 3.48 ± 0.51 | 0.565 | 0.573 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 4.01 ± 0.53 | 4.58 ± 0.49 | -7.245 | < 0.001 | |
| HBG (g/L) | Before intervention | 102.35 ± 12.68 | 101.87 ± 13.02 | 0.238 | 0.812 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 115.62 ± 11.85 | 128.43 ± 10.96 | -7.246 | < 0.001 | |
| ALB (g/L) | Before intervention | 32.15 ± 3.56 | 31.87 ± 3.42 | 0.513 | 0.609 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 35.82 ± 3.18 | 39.65 ± 2.87 | -8.092 | < 0.001 | |
| CRP-C (mg/L) | Before intervention | 45.62 ± 8.75 | 46.13 ± 8.52 | -0.367 | 0.714 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 28.35 ± 7.12 | 16.87 ± 6.35 | 10.732 | < 0.001 | |
| Positive microbial culture | Before intervention | 92 (92.00) | 93 (93.00) | 0.018 | 0.894 |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 45 (45.00) | 22 (22.00) | 11.874 | 0.001 |
Table 4 Comparison of Visual Analogue Scale score, Braden score and Self-Rating Anxiety Scale score between the two groups before and after intervention, mean ± SD
| Index | Time point | Control group (n = 78) | Study group (n = 78) | t value between groups | P value |
| VAS score | Before intervention | 7.82 ± 1.25 | 7.76 ± 1.31 | 0.293 | 0.770 |
| After 4 weeks of intervention | 5.23 ± 1.08 | 3.15 ± 0.96 | 12.714 | < 0.001 | |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 3.18 ± 0.87 | 1.56 ± 0.72 | 12.666 | < 0.001 | |
| Braden score | Before intervention | 12.35 ± 1.87 | 12.28 ± 1.93 | 0.230 | 0.818 |
| After 4 weeks of intervention | 14.52 ± 1.65 | 16.87 ± 1.52 | -9.256 | < 0.001 | |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 16.23 ± 1.48 | 18.56 ± 1.37 | -10.206 | < 0.001 | |
| SAS score | Before intervention | 65.32 ± 7.85 | 64.87 ± 8.02 | 0.354 | 0.724 |
| After 4 weeks of intervention | 52.15 ± 6.93 | 40.23 ± 6.15 | 11.364 | < 0.001 | |
| After 8 weeks of intervention | 45.68 ± 6.32 | 35.12 ± 5.87 | 10.816 | < 0.001 |
Table 5 Comparison of adverse reactions and complications between the two groups, n (%)
| Indicators | Control group (n = 78) | Study group (n = 78) | χ2 value | P value |
| Adverse reactions | 0.000 | 1.000 | ||
| VSD dressing allergy | 3 (3.85) | 2 (2.56) | ||
| Adverse drug reactions (nausea, dizziness) | 3 (3.85) | 2 (2.56) | ||
| Overall incidence | 6 (7.69) | 5 (6.41) | ||
| Complications | 5.100 | 0.024 | ||
| Bleeding from wounds | 2 (2.56) | 1 (1.28) | ||
| The wound infection was aggravated | 5 (6.41) | 1 (1.28) | ||
| Recurrence of pressure ulcers | 4 (5.13) | 2 (2.26) | ||
| Pulmonary infection | 6 (7.69) | 2 (2.56) | ||
| Overall incidence | 17 (21.79) | 6 (7.69) |
- Citation: Xing J, Jia YJ, Xin JQ, Liu JY, Cui Y, Zhang HW. Watson caring theory-based encouragement interventions for pain and anxiety in stage III-IV pressure ulcer patients. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(7): 117775
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i7/117775.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.117775