Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Psychiatry. Apr 19, 2026; 16(4): 115550
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115550
Published online Apr 19, 2026. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115550
Table 1 Overview of reviewed studies by research dimension
| Category | Specific factors | Key findings/mechanisms | Ref. |
| Core factors | Green space (positive) | Reduces physiological stress, restores attention (attention restoration theory), and builds social capital | Markevych et al[27]; James et al[28]; Bloemsma et al[30]; Larsen et al[31] |
| Long-term exposure in childhood predicts lower depression in early adulthood | |||
| Ecological quality (e.g., biodiversity) matters more than quantity | |||
| Blue space (positive) | Provides “soft fascination” and sensory stimulation (sound of water) | Gascon et al[50]; Pasanen et al[42] | |
| “Blue gym” effect: Promotes water-based physical activities | |||
| Reduces internalization problems (depression/anxiety) | |||
| Natural disasters (negative) | Short-term: Tornadoes, earthquakes, and floods trigger acute stress, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depression | Paul et al[52]; Feng et al[55]; Meltzer et al[64]; Proulx et al[70] | |
| Long-term: Disruption of social support and chronic stress from climate change lead to persistent psychological issues | |||
| Mediating mechanisms | Physical activity | Nature increases frequency/intensity of exercise (“environmental attractiveness”) | McCormick[77]; Lubans et al[78]; Thompson Coon et al[79] |
| Neuroendocrine regulation through active behavior | |||
| Social interaction | Nature serves as a “safe social haven” and “neutral medium” | Sugiyama et al[84]; Birch et al[86] | |
| Enhances social cohesion and reduces loneliness | |||
| Positive psychological experiences | “Optimizing internal states”: Reduces rumination and enhances subjective well-being | Bratman et al[88]; Liu et al[89]; Marselle et al[98] | |
| Builds psychological resilience and self-efficacy | |||
| Moderating variables | Individual factors | Gender: Context-specific results (e.g., males benefit more from physical activity in nature; females from social support) | Larsen et al[31]; Liu et al[101]; Bratman et al[106] |
| Behavioral problems: “Amplification effect”, adolescents with behavioral issues benefit more from nature’s nonjudgmental setting | |||
| Environmental factors | SES: “Priority protective effect”, nature benefits low-SES adolescents more significantly | Mitchell et al[107]; Geary et al[108]; Beyer et al[115]; Anglin et al[116] | |
| Urbanization: “Stress compensation”, nature acts as an antidote to high-density urban stress | |||
| Sunlight: Regulates vitamin D synthesis and circadian rhythms |
- Citation: Zheng YF, Zheng YM, Liu XQ. Natural environments and adolescent depression: A literature review. World J Psychiatry 2026; 16(4): 115550
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-3206/full/v16/i4/115550.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v16.i4.115550
